The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures
Abstract
Defining and measuring readability in the context of financial disclosures becomes important with the increasing use of textual analysis and the Securities and Exchange Commission's plain English initiative. We propose defining readability as the effective communication of valuation‐relevant information. The Fog Index—the most commonly applied readability measure—is shown to be poorly specified in financial applications. Of Fog's two components, one is misspecified and the other is difficult to measure. We report that 10‐K document file size provides a simple readability proxy that outperforms the Fog Index, does not require document parsing, facilitates replication, and is correlated with alternative readability constructs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity
White, H. (1980) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912934 · Cited by 25,861
When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10‐Ks
LOUGHRAN, T., & MCDONALD, B. (2011) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x · Cited by 6,015
Self-citationFama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1997) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(96)00896-3 · Cited by 5,669
Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market
TETLOCK, P. C. (2007) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01232.x · Cited by 4,827
How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?
Biddle, G. C., Hilary, G., & Verdi, R. S. (2009) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.001 · Cited by 3,214
Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay?
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00038-1 · Cited by 3,035
Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence
Li, F. (2008) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003 · Cited by 2,838
Is All That Talk Just Noise? The Information Content of Internet Stock Message Boards
Antweiler, W., & Frank, M. Z. (2004) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00662.x · Cited by 2,373
More Than Words: Quantifying Language to Measure Firms' Fundamentals
TETLOCK, P. C., SAAR‐TSECHANSKY, M., & MACSKASSY, S. (2008) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01362.x · Cited by 2,304
Differences of Opinion and the Cross Section of Stock Returns
Diether, K. B., Malloy, C. J., & Scherbina, A. (2002) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00490 · Cited by 2,139
Cited by
LEUZ, C., & WYSOCKI, P. D. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12115 · Cited by 1,760
The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation
Dyer, T., Lang, M., & Stice-Lawrence, L. (2017) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.07.002 · Cited by 841
Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research
Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx104 · Cited by 636
A plain English measure of financial reporting readability
Bonsall, S. B., Leone, A. J., Miller, B. P., & Rennekamp, K. (2017) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.03.002 · Cited by 624
How Does Social Media Impact Bitcoin Value? A Test of the Silent Majority Hypothesis
Mai, F., Shan, Z., Bai, Q., Wang, X. (., & Chiang, R. H. L. (2018) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1440774 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- LOUGHRAN, T., & MCDONALD, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07-18
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1643-1671
- ISSN
- 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6261
- OpenAlex
- W2313281002
- Cited by
- 1,446
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 257.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jofi.12162
- The paper
- LOUGHRAN, T., & MCDONALD, B. (2014). Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.