Cited by 27Fetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Current status of fetal neurodevelopmental assessment: Four‐dimensional ultrasound study

Hata, Toshiyuki·2016·Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research

Abstract

With the latest advent of four-dimensional (4-D) ultrasound, fetal neurobehavioral or neurodevelopmental assessment can be easily and readily performed. Using this technique, typical fetal movements and behavioral patterns have become apparent in all three trimesters of pregnancy. In twin pregnancy, 4-D ultrasound facilitates the precise evaluation of inter-twin contact and intra-pair stimulation. New fetal neurobehavioral assessment tests, such as Kurjak's Antenatal Neurodevelopmental Test and the Fetal Observable Movement System, may reflect the normal and abnormal neurological development of the fetus, and will facilitate more precise assessments of fetal neurobehavior or neurodevelopment, and fetal brain and central nervous system functions. In this review article, I also discuss interesting topics regarding maternal and fetal stress, fetal pain, and fetal consciousness. Four-dimensional ultrasound has opened the door to new scientific fields, such as 'fetal neurology' and 'fetal psychology,' and fetal neurobehavioral science is at the dawn of a new era. Knowledge on fetal neurobehavior and neurodevelopment will be advanced through fetal behavioral research using this technique.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jog.13099

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hata, T.
Affiliations
Kagawa University (JP)
Corresponding author
Hata, Toshiyuki
Venue
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-16
Volume
42
Issue
10
Pages
1211-1221
ISSN
  • 1341-8076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0756
OpenAlex
W2508386341
Cited by
27
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24119004)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
fetal brain development, fetal neurobehavior, 4D ultrasound, fetal movement, twin pregnancy, fetal central nervous system, fetal pain, fetal consciousness, maternal stress, fetal stress, fetal neurology
MeSH terms
Female, Fetal Diseases, Fetal Movement, Humans, Neurologic Examination, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimesters, Twins, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Fetal Development, Pregnancy, Twin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review