Cited by 19Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Postural orthostatic tachycardia is not a useful diagnostic marker for chronic fatigue syndrome

Open access
Roerink, M. E., Lenders, J. W. M., Schmits, I. C., Pistorius, A. M. A., Smit, J. W., Knoop, H., van der Meer, J. W. M.·2017·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is considered a diagnostic marker for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Objectives: The aims of this study were to (i) compare POTS prevalence in a CFS cohort with fatigued patients not meeting CFS criteria, and (ii) assess activity, impairment and response to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in CFS patients with POTS (POTS‐CFS) and without POTS (non‐POTS‐CFS). Methods: Prospective cohort study at the Radboud University Medical Centre in the Netherlands. Between June 2013 and December 2014, 863 consecutive patients with persistent fatigue were screened. Patients underwent an active standing test, filled out questionnaires and wore an activity‐sensing device for a period of 12 days. Results: A total of 419 patients with CFS and 341 non‐CFS fatigued patients were included in the study. POTS prevalence in adult patients with CFS was 5.7% vs. 6.9% in non‐CFS adults (P = 0.54). In adolescents, prevalence rates were 18.2% and 17.4%, respectively (P = 0.93). Adult patients with POTS‐CFS were younger (30 ± 12 vs. 40 ± 13 years, P = 0.001) and had a higher supine heart rate (71 ± 11 vs. 65 ± 9 beats per min, P = 0.009) compared with non‐POTS‐CFS patients. Severity and activity patterns did not differ between groups. In patients with CFS, criteria for Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease (SEID) were met in 76% of adults and 67% of adolescents. In these patients with CFS fulfilling the SEID criteria, the prevalence of POTS was not different from that in the overall CFS population. POTS‐CFS adolescents had less clinically significant improvement after CBT than non‐POTS‐CFS adolescents (58% vs. 88%, P = 0.017). Conclusion: In adults with CFS, the prevalence of POTS was low, was not different from the rate in non‐CFS fatigued patients and was not related to disease severity or treatment outcome. In POTS‐CFS adolescents, CBT was less successful than in non‐POTS‐CFS patients. The evaluation of POTS appears to be of limited value for the diagnosis of CFS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joim.12564

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some further trials were not eligible for inclusion in the review because symptom burden was not measured.

    “were not eligible for inclusion due to symptom burden not being measured”

    From Self-reported symptom burden in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): A narrative review of observational and interventional studies (2023) · cites this paper as Roerink et al., 2017

    The available Abstract passage reports findings about POTS, chronic fatigue syndrome, and CBT outcomes, but does not discuss a review’s eligibility criteria. Searches for symptom burden not being measured and trials excluded from a review found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roerink, M. E., Lenders, J. W. M., Schmits, I. C., Pistorius, A. M. A., Smit, J. W., Knoop, H., & van der Meer, J. W. M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of Internal Medicine Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Roerink, M. E.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-02
Volume
281
Issue
2
Pages
179-188
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2528706699
Cited by
19
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive behavioral therapy, adolescents, activity patterns, heart rate, diagnostic biomarkers, persistent fatigue, treatment outcomes, disease severity, sex differences, age differences, comorbidities, anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Pressure, Fatigue, Humans, Netherlands, Prospective Studies, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Prevalence, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review