Cited by 38Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Long-term follow-up of patients with postural tachycardia syndrome

Sousa, Alexandra, Lebreiro, Ana, Freitas, João, Maciel, Mª Júlia·2012·Clinical Autonomic Research

Abstract

Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) refers to the presence of orthostatic intolerance symptoms with a heart rate increment ≥ 30 bpm, usually up to ≥ 120 bpm. Pathophysiology and POTS's clinical presentation are heterogeneous and its prognosis is uncertain. We reviewed the major clinical characteristics of POTS patients and assessed their long-term follow-up. Our series results, one with the longest follow-up, illustrate POTS as a clinical entity with variable, but usually benign outcome, in which most patients can reassume their daily activities without great limitations, after proper diagnosis and treatment are made.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10286-011-0155-1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 17-patient study, about one-third were symptom-free at follow-up, half had improved significantly, 12% remained highly symptomatic, and 62% were still taking medication.

    “In this 17 patient study, approximately one-third of patients were completely asymptomatic, half reported significant improvement, 12% remained highly symptomatic, and 62% remained on pharmacological therapy on follow-up consistent with favorable disease progression.”

    From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Sousa et al., 2012

  • In a small series, adolescents with severe POTS showed substantial improvement after diagnosis and treatment, with a mean follow-up of 92 months.

    “In another small series, adolescents with florid POTS reported substantial improvement after diagnosis and treatment with a mean follow-up time of 92 months (Sousa et al., 2012).”

    From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Sousa et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sousa, A., Lebreiro, A., Freitas, J., & Maciel, M. J.
Affiliations
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Sousa, Alexandra
Venue
Clinical Autonomic Research
Published
2011-12-22
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
151-153
ISSN
  • 0959-9851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-1560
OpenAlex
W2089256890
Cited by
38
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Autonomic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, orthostatic intolerance, long-term follow-up, prognosis, autonomic dysfunction, daily activity limitations
MeSH terms
Adult, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Orthostatic Intolerance, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review