Going Off Script: How Managers Make Sense of the Ending of Their Careers
Abstract
The extant retirement literature primarily focuses on factors that influence the decision to retire and the generic retirement decision‐making process. While these approaches have extended our understanding of retirement decision‐making, we propose a sensemaking perspective that orients our attention towards the subjective meanings people attach to the factors that trigger the retirement decision, rather than simply the factors themselves. Accordingly, we see the retirement decision‐making process as bounded by situational constraints and rooted in identity work. Based on interviews with 48 retired Canadian executives and managers, we use thematic narrative analysis to identify six types of end‐of‐career narratives. Drawing on these narratives, we present a model of identity work that distinguishes between retirement decision‐making factors that are perceived as identity opportunities and those that are perceived as identity threats. Our findings contribute to scholarly understanding of subjective meanings and identity considerations in the process of ending one's career.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Professionals' sensemaking efforts towards new technologies are intertwined with their role identities.
“previous literature suggests that professionals' sensemaking efforts towards new technologies in general are intertwined with their role identities (Vough et al., 2015;Weick, 1995)”
From The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology (2025) · cites this paper as Vough et al., 2015
Cites
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 · Cited by 1,845 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is consistent with identity protecting through positive distinctiveness, wherein individuals change negative meanings associated with a threat to more positive meanings (Ellemers et al., 2002).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Covid-19 crisis as a career shock: Implications for careers and vocational behavior
Akkermans, J., Richardson, J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2020) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103434 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology
Scarbrough, H., Chen, Y., & Patriotta, G. (2025) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13065 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vough, H. C., Bataille, C. D., Noh, S. C., & Lee, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Ithaca College (US)
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Vough, Heather C.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 414-440
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W1486879886
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 11.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
- Digital Collections - Ithaca College Library (Ithaca College) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (864-2007-0047)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Keywords
- retirement decisions, end of career, sensemaking, identity work, identity threat, managers, executives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review