Cited by 80Retirement, Disability, and EmploymentManagement and Organizational StudiesHuman Resource and Talent Management

Going Off Script: How Managers Make Sense of the Ending of Their Careers

Vough, Heather C., Bataille, Christine D., Noh, Sung Chul, Lee, Mary Dean·2015·Journal of Management Studies

Abstract

The extant retirement literature primarily focuses on factors that influence the decision to retire and the generic retirement decision‐making process. While these approaches have extended our understanding of retirement decision‐making, we propose a sensemaking perspective that orients our attention towards the subjective meanings people attach to the factors that trigger the retirement decision, rather than simply the factors themselves. Accordingly, we see the retirement decision‐making process as bounded by situational constraints and rooted in identity work. Based on interviews with 48 retired Canadian executives and managers, we use thematic narrative analysis to identify six types of end‐of‐career narratives. Drawing on these narratives, we present a model of identity work that distinguishes between retirement decision‐making factors that are perceived as identity opportunities and those that are perceived as identity threats. Our findings contribute to scholarly understanding of subjective meanings and identity considerations in the process of ending one's career.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joms.12126

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Professionals' sensemaking efforts towards new technologies are intertwined with their role identities.

    “previous literature suggests that professionals' sensemaking efforts towards new technologies in general are intertwined with their role identities (Vough et al., 2015;Weick, 1995)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vough, H. C., Bataille, C. D., Noh, S. C., & Lee, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Ithaca College (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Vough, Heather C.
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-06
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
414-440
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
OpenAlex
W1486879886
Cited by
80
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Collections - Ithaca College Library (Ithaca College) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (864-2007-0047)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
retirement decisions, end of career, sensemaking, identity work, identity threat, managers, executives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review