Toward a Framework of Leader Character in Organizations
Abstract
While the construct of character is well grounded in philosophy, ethics, and more recently psychology, it lags in acceptance and legitimacy within management research and mainstream practice. Our research seeks to remedy this through four contributions. First, we offer a framework of leader character that provides rigor through a three‐phase, multi‐method approach involving 1817 leaders, and relevance by using an engaged scholarship epistemology to validate the framework with practicing leaders. This framework highlights the theoretical underpinnings of the leader character model and articulates the character dimensions and elements that operate in concert to promote effective leadership. Second, we bring leader character into mainstream management research, extending the traditional competency and interpersonal focus on leadership to embrace the foundational component of leader character. In doing this, we articulate how leader character complements and strengthens several existing theories of leadership. Third, we extend the virtues‐based approach to ethical decision making to the broader domain of judgement and decision making in support of pursuing individual and organization effectiveness. Finally, we offer promising directions for future research on leader character that will also serve the larger domain of leadership research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Judgment plays a critical role in leader character.
“We positioned judgment in the center of our framework because it plays a critical role in leader character (Crossan et al., 2017; Crossan et al., 2016).”
From Transformational change and leader character (2018) · cites this paper as Crossan et al., 2017
Judgment plays a critical role in leader character.
“We positioned judgment in the center of our framework because it plays a critical role in leader character (Crossan et al., 2017; Crossan et al., 2016).”
From Transformational change and leader character (2018) · cites this paper as Crossan et al., 2016
Cites
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.
Russell, J. A. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145 · Cited by 6,113 · see citing works
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942 · see citing works
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540 · see citing works
Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001 · Cited by 5,478 · see citing works
Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis
van Dierendonck, D. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310380462 · Cited by 2,218 · see citing works
Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership
Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0795 · Cited by 927 · see citing works
Too Much of a Good Thing: The Challenge and Opportunity of the Inverted U
Grant, A. M., & Schwartz, B. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393523 · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Lehnert, K., Park, Y.-H., & Singh, N. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2147-2 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Character matters: Character dimensions’ impact on leader performance and outcomes
Seijts, G., Gandz, J., Crossan, M., & Reno, M. (2015) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2014.11.008 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transformational change and leader character
Seijts, G. H., & Gandz, J. (2018) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.005 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Crossan, M. M., Byrne, A., Seijts, G. H., Reno, M., Monzani, L., & Gandz, J.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Crossan, Mary M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-03
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 986-1018
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2566560558
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 15.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
- Keywords
- leader character, leadership, character dimensions, ethical decision-making, judgment and decision making, leadership effectiveness, engaged scholarship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review