Cited by 162Ethics in Business and EducationLeadership and Management in OrganizationsLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies

Toward a Framework of Leader Character in Organizations

Crossan, Mary M., Byrne, Alyson, Seijts, Gerard H., Reno, Mark, Monzani, Lucas, Gandz, Jeffrey·2017·Journal of Management Studies

Abstract

While the construct of character is well grounded in philosophy, ethics, and more recently psychology, it lags in acceptance and legitimacy within management research and mainstream practice. Our research seeks to remedy this through four contributions. First, we offer a framework of leader character that provides rigor through a three‐phase, multi‐method approach involving 1817 leaders, and relevance by using an engaged scholarship epistemology to validate the framework with practicing leaders. This framework highlights the theoretical underpinnings of the leader character model and articulates the character dimensions and elements that operate in concert to promote effective leadership. Second, we bring leader character into mainstream management research, extending the traditional competency and interpersonal focus on leadership to embrace the foundational component of leader character. In doing this, we articulate how leader character complements and strengthens several existing theories of leadership. Third, we extend the virtues‐based approach to ethical decision making to the broader domain of judgement and decision making in support of pursuing individual and organization effectiveness. Finally, we offer promising directions for future research on leader character that will also serve the larger domain of leadership research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joms.12254

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Judgment plays a critical role in leader character.

    “We positioned judgment in the center of our framework because it plays a critical role in leader character (Crossan et al., 2017; Crossan et al., 2016).”

    From Transformational change and leader character (2018) · cites this paper as Crossan et al., 2017

  • Judgment plays a critical role in leader character.

    “We positioned judgment in the center of our framework because it plays a critical role in leader character (Crossan et al., 2017; Crossan et al., 2016).”

    From Transformational change and leader character (2018) · cites this paper as Crossan et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crossan, M. M., Byrne, A., Seijts, G. H., Reno, M., Monzani, L., & Gandz, J.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Corresponding author
Crossan, Mary M.
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-03
Volume
54
Issue
7
Pages
986-1018
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
OpenAlex
W2566560558
Cited by
162
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
15.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Keywords
leader character, leadership, character dimensions, ethical decision-making, judgment and decision making, leadership effectiveness, engaged scholarship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review