Reproducibility of the structural connectome reconstruction across diffusion methods
Abstract
Analysis of the structural connectomes can lead to powerful insights about the brain's organization and damage. However, the accuracy and reproducibility of constructing the structural connectome done with different acquisition and reconstruction techniques is not well defined. In this work, we evaluated the reproducibility of the structural connectome techniques by performing test-retest (same day) and longitudinal studies (after 1 month) as well as analyzing graph-based measures on the data acquired from 22 healthy volunteers (6 subjects were used for the longitudinal study). We compared connectivity matrices and tract reconstructions obtained with the most typical acquisition schemes used in clinical application: diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI), and diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI). We observed that all techniques showed high reproducibility in the test-retest analysis (correlation >.9). However, HARDI was the only technique with low variability (2%) in the longitudinal assessment (1-month interval). The intraclass coefficient analysis showed the highest reproducibility for the DTI connectome, however, with more sparse connections than HARDI and DSI. Qualitative (neuroanatomical) assessment of selected tracts confirmed the quantitative results showing that HARDI managed to detect most of the analyzed fiber groups and fanning fibers. In conclusion, we found that HARDI acquisition showed the most balanced trade-off between hi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modern multi-fiber tractography is more sensitive and more consistent across subjects and timepoints than traditional single-fiber DTI tractography.
“In general, studies indicate that modern multi-fiber tractography is more sensitive when performing tractography and thus is more consistent across subjects and timepoints than traditional single-fiber DTI tractography (Bucci et al., 2013; Prčkovska et al., 2016).”
From Quantitative mapping of the brain’s structural connectivity using diffusion MRI tractography: A review (2022) · cites this paper as Prčkovska et al., 2016
Cites
Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks
Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., & Bullmore, E. T. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041 · Cited by 2,750 · see citing works
The neural basis of human moral cognition
Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1768 · Cited by 930 · see citing works
Comparing connectomes across subjects and populations at different scales
Meskaldji, D. E., Fischi-Gomez, E., Griffa, A., Hagmann, P., Morgenthaler, S., & Thiran, J.-P. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.084 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, F., Daducci, A., He, Y., Schiavi, S., Seguin, C., Smith, R. E., Yeh, C.-H., Zhao, T., & O’Donnell, L. J. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118870 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
“In general, studies indicate that modern multifiber tractography is more sensitive when performing tractography and thus is more consistent across subjects and timepoints than traditional single-fiber DTI tractography [63, 374].”
- Authors
- Prčkovska, V., Rodrigues, P., Puigdellivol Sanchez, A., Ramos, M., Andorra, M., Martinez‐Heras, E., Falcon, C., Prats‐Galino, A., & Villoslada, P.
- Affiliations
- Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES)
- Mint Labs S.L Barcelona Spain
- Laboratory of Surgical Neuroanatomy, Human Anatomy, and Embryology Unit, Faculty of Medicine University of Barcelona Spain
- Center of Neuroimmunology Institut d'Investigacions Biomedica August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS) Barcelona Spain
- BarcelonaBeta Brain Research Center Pasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelona Spain
- Corresponding author
- Villoslada, Pablo
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroimaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-14
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-57
- ISSN
- 1051-2284 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6569
- OpenAlex
- W1906641900
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- FP7 Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship (328060)
- “La Marató de TV3” (0891430)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- structural connectome, reproducibility, diffusion MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, high angular resolution diffusion imaging, diffusion spectrum imaging, tractography, test-retest reliability, longitudinal assessment, intraclass correlation coefficient
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Nerve Net, Reproducibility of Results, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Connectome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review