Cited by 59Nursing education and managementJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The relationships of meaningful work and narcissistic leadership with nurses’ job satisfaction

Open access
Ghislieri, Chiara, Cortese, Claudio G., Molino, Monica, Gatti, Paola·2019·Journal of Nursing Management

Abstract

AIM: The study investigated the association of narcissistic leadership, workload and emotional demands with nurses' job satisfaction and the mediational role of meaningful work. BACKGROUND: Considering the strong positive relationship that meaningful work has with job satisfaction, investigating its antecedents is crucial. METHOD: A group of 602 nurses participated in the study completing a self-report questionnaire. Structural equation model analysis was applied. RESULTS: Narcissistic leadership showed a negative association while emotional demands showed a positive one with meaningful work. The three determinants had a negative association with job satisfaction, while meaningful work showed a positive one. The indirect relationship with job satisfaction mediated by meaningful work was negative for narcissistic leadership and positive for emotional demands. CONCLUSION: The study adds to the literature mainly by the investigation of the mediational role of meaningful work in a sample of nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Measures should promote supportive, instead of narcissistic, leadership behaviours. Moreover, nurses should be assisted in identifying emotional demands as a meaningful aspect of their work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jonm.12859

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghislieri, C., Cortese, C. G., Molino, M., & Gatti, P.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Molino, Monica
Venue
Journal of Nursing Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
1691-1699
ISSN
  • 0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2834
OpenAlex
W2972154821
Cited by
59
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
meaningful work, narcissistic leadership, job satisfaction, nurses, workload, emotional demands, nursing leadership, supportive leadership
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Italy, Job Satisfaction, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Narcissism, Nurses, Surveys and Questionnaires, Workload, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review