Cited by 8Corruption and Economic DevelopmentPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEthics in Business and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Influence of Sociocultural Beliefs on Adolescents’ Moral and Tolerance Evaluations Toward Corruption

Open access
Martínez, Cristhian A., Posada, Roberto·2022·Journal of Research on Adolescence

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In the present research, we examine how sociocultural beliefs facilitate more positive and tolerant evaluations toward corruption. Ninety‐six adolescents from 6th grade ( M = 11.9 years), 11th grade ( M = 16.6 years), and college ( M = 20.5 years), from Colombia—a country with high levels of corruption—evaluated how morally right and acceptable were bribery and nepotism across a baseline condition without sociocultural information, and three experimental conditions including sociocultural beliefs about illegality, institutional illegitimacy, and survival. Results suggest that compared to the baseline, the sociocultural beliefs in the three experimental conditions lead to more positive and tolerant evaluations, and less severity and more acceptability towards corruption in different degrees. Implications for moral reasoning about corruption are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jora.12729

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.2307/3186095 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/J.JESP.2006.05.013 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1467‐9507.2008.00483.x · DOI
  4. 10.1080/0305724022014322 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bartels D. M., 2014, The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making, 51
  6. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/d41586‐018‐02107‐w · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.1183665 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1353/lap.2005.0031 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/1467-8624.00122 · DOI
  11. 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Cuellar M. M., 2000, Colombia: un proyecto inconcluso; valores, instituciones y capital social
  13. 10.1111/j.2044‐835X.1983.tb00543.x · DOI
  14. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400262 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s10610‐016‐9308‐z · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00896.x · DOI
  17. García M., 2009, Normas de papel : la cultura del incumplimiento de reglas
  18. 10.1006/OBHD.1993.1004 · DOI
  19. Helwig C., 2013, Handbook of moral development, 46
  20. 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X · DOI · Paper page
  21. Herrera C., 2006, Nuestra Identidad Estudio Colombiano de Valores
  22. 10.1111/j.0092‐5853.2004.00056.x · DOI
  23. Karp J. A., 2009, Politicians, scandals, and trust in government, Political Behavior, 26, 271
  24. 10.1177/1368430209346700 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/0956797616682026 · DOI
  26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/s11109‐006‐9013 · DOI
  28. 10.3200/GENP.136.3.271‐286 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s10610‐016‐9324‐z · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0263395717724295 · DOI
  31. 10.1017/CBO9780511605987 · DOI
  32. 10.1159/000484067 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1467‐8624.2008.01165.x · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jce.2018.11.003 · DOI
  35. Putnam R., 2001, Social capital: Measurement and consequences, Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2
  36. 10.1177/0044118X13507295 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/cdev.12349 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s11109‐005‐4469‐3 · DOI
  39. Sánchez M. G., 2015, Cultura política de la democracia en Colombia, 2015 Actitudes democráticas en zonas de consolidación territorial
  40. 10.1348/026151099165393 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.001 · DOI
  42. Smetana J., 2006, Handbook of moral development, 119
  43. Tisak M., 1995, Annals of child development, 95
  44. 10.1111/j.1467‐9221.2004.00380.x · DOI
  45. Transparency International, 2013, Corruption perceptions index 2013
  46. Transparency International, 2020, Corruption perceptions index 2020
  47. Transparency International, 2021, What is corruption?
  48. Turiel E., 1983, The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention
  49. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01573.x · DOI
  50. 10.1002/cd.23219977606 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/cd.23220008904 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/cd.94 · DOI
  53. Wainryb C., 2006, Handbook of moral development, 211
  54. 10.1037//0012‐1649.37.3.373 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1467‐8624.1998.tb06176.x · DOI
  56. 10.1207/s15326985ep28032 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martínez, C. A., & Posada, R.
Affiliations
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO)
Corresponding author
Martínez, Cristhian A.
Venue
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-17
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
1515-1529
ISSN
  • 1050-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7795
OpenAlex
W4205789348
Cited by
8
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
corruption, socio-cultural beliefs, moral evaluation, tolerance, adolescents, bribery, nepotism, illegality, survival, moral reasoning
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Colombia, Humans, Morals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review