Cited by 613Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Coordinated Punishment of Defectors Sustains Cooperation and Can Proliferate When Rare

Boyd, Robert, Gintis, Herbert, Bowles, Samuel·2010·Science

Abstract

Learning to Work Together: In group endeavors, there is often a tension between working for the greater good of the group as a whole versus working for one's own benefit. Sometimes these paths coincide and sometimes they do not; furthermore, the choices made by other group members can influence the calculation of which path to take. A pair of studies now approaches this challenge from experimental and theoretical points of view. In a forest or fishery, harvesting of wood or food needs to take into account the renewable character of the resource, as well as spatial heterogeneity. Janssen et al. (p. 613 ; see the Perspective by Putterman ) show that communication among the group members is key, both to establishing a maintainable rate of harvesting, as well as enforcement via punishment of noncompliers. Boyd et al. (p. 617 ; see the Perspective by Putterman ) develop a model showing that punishment, which is a costly activity, is most effectively levied when implemented with the approval of group members; that is, coordinated punishment works to the benefit of the whole, whereas individual actions do not.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1183665

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., & Bowles, S.
Affiliations
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
  • University of Siena (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Boyd, Robert
  • Gintis, Herbert
  • Bowles, Samuel
Venue
Science
Published
2010-04-30
Volume
328
Issue
5978
Pages
617-620
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1985340978
Cited by
613
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 51
FWCI
159.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
evolution of cooperation, free-riding, cost of punishment
MeSH terms
Communication, Cooperative Behavior, Games, Experimental, Group Processes, Humans, Models, Psychological, Punishment, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review