The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remembrance, Responsibility, and Reparations: The Use of Emotions in Talk about the 1921 Tulsa Race Riot
Abstract
This research aimed to examine the role of collective emotions in the process of political solidarity within the context of debate about reparations for the 1921 Tulsa Race Riot. Analysis of interview data (n = 12) illustrates the creative and flexible ways that White allies delegitimize authority inaction and legitimize majority support for action through strategic use of social categories and collective emotions in their talk about the riot and reparations. Results are interpreted to suggest that allies’ efforts to change the hearts and minds of the majority focus on messages that appeal to, strengthen, and validate valued dimensions of majority social identity. These findings expand our understanding of the discursive aspects of political solidarity and the processes that affect social change on social issues related to minority group interests.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Those that emotionally appeal to allies situated in privileged positions in the majority culture (Greenwood, 2015) can create strong cross-cultural coalitions that help the traumatized group regain part of what may have felt was lost in history or in silence.”
From Processing Cultural Trauma: Intergenerational Effects of the Japanese American Incarceration (2015) · cites this paper as Greenwood, 2015
Citations
Cites
Processing Cultural Trauma: Intergenerational Effects of the Japanese American Incarceration
Nagata, D. K., Kim, J. H. J., & Nguyen, T. U. (2015) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12115 · Cited by 70
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Antaki C., 2008, Identities in talk, 10.4135/9781446216958 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0957926511405573 · DOI
- Barkan E., 2000, The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices
- 10.1017/CBO9781139106931 · DOI
- Brophy A. L., 2002, Reconstructing the dreamland: The Tulsa Race Riot of 1921, race, reparations, and reconciliation
- 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.872 · DOI
- 10.1348/014466599162782 · DOI · Paper page
- Ellsworth S., 1992, Death in a promised land
- 10.1111/pops.12184 · DOI
- 10.1111/josi.12116 · DOI
- Hirsch J., 2002, Riot and remembrance: America's worst race riot and its legacy
- Hochschild A. R., 1983, The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling
- 10.1111/josi.12109 · DOI
- 10.1111/josi.12106 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167202238377 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167206297402 · DOI
- Johnson H. B., 1998, Black Wall Street
- Keltner D., 2001, Emotions: Current issues and future directions, 192
- 10.1177/0146167206289729 · DOI
- Madigan T., 2001, The burning: Massacre, destruction, and the Tulsa Race Riot of 1921
- 10.1111/josi.12107 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167204271713 · DOI
- 10.1177/0959353510384125 · DOI
- 10.1111/josi.12111 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088868308323223 · DOI
- Tulsa Race Riot Commission, 2001, Tulsa Race Riot: A Report by the Oklahoma Commission to Study the Tulsa Race Riot of 1921
- Turner J. C., 1987, Rediscovering the social group: A self‐categorization theory
- 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649 · DOI · Paper page
- Wetherell M., 1992, Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation
- Wetherell M., 2001, Discourse as data: A guide for analysis
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Processing Cultural Trauma: Intergenerational Effects of the Japanese American Incarceration
Nagata, D. K., Kim, J. H. J., & Nguyen, T. U. (2015) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12115 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenwood, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Limerick (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Greenwood, Ronni Michelle
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 338-355
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W1598822246
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Nuffield Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Keywords
- reparations, collective emotions, political solidarity, white allies, social identity, social change, racial justice, discursive strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
