“Fear of Falling”: Economic Instability Enhances Collective Angst among Societies’ Wealthy Class
Open accessAbstract
In 2008, an era of unprecedented growth and prosperity came to an end, and the world was plunged into the Great Recession, a Global Financial Crisis (GFC)—the worst since the 1930s Great Depression. We examined whether it is low‐ or high‐SES people that are most affected psychologically—and most likely to express concern about the future vitality of their group—by uncertainty associated with economic instability. In two experiments, we found that even though those lower in SES report more collective angst than their wealthier counterparts, those who are higher in SES are more likely to become concerned when presented with information that the economy is a bubble about to burst, elevating their collective angst levels. Both studies also showed that collective self‐definitions as competent and warm were affected by wealth but not by economic instability. Competence ratings increased with increasing wealth, whereas warmth ratings were lower for those both lower and higher in wealth, compared to those with moderate wealth. In Experiment 2, we also found that opposition to immigration was higher for the high‐income group in the unstable than in the stable economic prospect condition. We conclude that even though those lower in income experience chronic collective angst, collective angst levels for those higher in income are elevated when they fear they may be living in a bubble economy—a bubble that may burst any moment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High-SES participants expressed anxiety when they were presented with information suggesting high economic instability.
“high‐SES participants expressed anxiety when they were presented with information suggesting that there was high economic instability”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Jetten et al. (2017)
Collective angst was higher among low-SES participants.
“they found that collective angst was higher among low‐SES participants.”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Jetten, Mols, Healy, and Spears (2017)
High-SES participants were more likely to oppose immigration when economic instability was said to be high rather than low.
“they were more likely to oppose immigration when economic instability was said to be high, rather than low.”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Jetten et al. (2017)
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524 · see citing works
Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4 · Cited by 1,588 · see citing works
Social status and health in humans and other animals
Sapolsky, R. M. (2004) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144000 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Barlow, D. H. (1991) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0201_15 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12251 · Cited by 831 · see citing works
Intergroup Emotions Theory: Production, Regulation, and Modification of Group-Based Emotions
Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2018) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.03.001 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Wang, T., Wang, X., Jiang, T., Wang, S., & Chen, Z. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18063170 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jetten, J., Mols, F., Healy, N., & Spears, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Jetten, Jolanda
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-79
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2596394106
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 29.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2021-09-21)
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DP120100053)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- economic instability, wealth inequality, socioeconomic status, economic uncertainty, bubble economy, self-concept, warmth and competence, opposition to immigration, Great Recession, 2008 financial crisis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review