Cited by 118Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionCultural Differences and Values

“Fear of Falling”: Economic Instability Enhances Collective Angst among Societies’ Wealthy Class

Open access
Jetten, Jolanda, Mols, Frank, Healy, Nikita, Spears, Russell·2017·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

In 2008, an era of unprecedented growth and prosperity came to an end, and the world was plunged into the Great Recession, a Global Financial Crisis (GFC)—the worst since the 1930s Great Depression. We examined whether it is low‐ or high‐SES people that are most affected psychologically—and most likely to express concern about the future vitality of their group—by uncertainty associated with economic instability. In two experiments, we found that even though those lower in SES report more collective angst than their wealthier counterparts, those who are higher in SES are more likely to become concerned when presented with information that the economy is a bubble about to burst, elevating their collective angst levels. Both studies also showed that collective self‐definitions as competent and warm were affected by wealth but not by economic instability. Competence ratings increased with increasing wealth, whereas warmth ratings were lower for those both lower and higher in wealth, compared to those with moderate wealth. In Experiment 2, we also found that opposition to immigration was higher for the high‐income group in the unstable than in the stable economic prospect condition. We conclude that even though those lower in income experience chronic collective angst, collective angst levels for those higher in income are elevated when they fear they may be living in a bubble economy—a bubble that may burst any moment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/josi.12204

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jetten, J., Mols, F., Healy, N., & Spears, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Jetten, Jolanda
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
61-79
ISSN
  • 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4560
OpenAlex
W2596394106
Cited by
118
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
29.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-09-21)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP120100053)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
economic instability, wealth inequality, socioeconomic status, economic uncertainty, bubble economy, self-concept, warmth and competence, opposition to immigration, Great Recession, 2008 financial crisis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review