CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84Social and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Intergroup Emotions Theory: Production, Regulation, and Modification of Group-Based Emotions

Open access
Mackie, Diane M., Smith, Eliot R.·2018·Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
DOI 10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.03.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.03.001

Cites

270 of 270 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social-psychological theories of social identity and self-categorization posit that when an individual's social or group identity is activated, they tend to display preferential attitudes and behaviors toward their own group (ingroup solidarity) and distrust and dislike toward other groups (outgroup hostility).

    “the social-psychological theories of social identity and self-categorization9,10 posit that when an individual’s social or group identity is activated, they tend to display preferential attitudes and behaviors toward their own group (ingroup solidarity) and distrust and dislike toward other groups (outgroup hostility)9,11,12.”

    From Generative language models exhibit social identity biases (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

  • Most out-of-the-box language models exhibit both ingroup solidarity and outgroup hostility to a similar degree, mirroring human-level averages found in the pretraining corpora.

    “As predicted by social identity and intergroup emotions theory9,11, we found that most out-of-the-box language models exhibit both ingroup solidarity and outgroup hostility to a similar degree, mirroring human-level averages found in the pretraining corpora.”

    From Generative language models exhibit social identity biases (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 272 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Mackie, Diane M.
ORCID
Venue
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2018
Pages
1-69
ISSN
0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.03.001
OpenAlex
W2801945329
Cited by
84
References
272
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
40.54
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
intergroup emotions, group membership, group identification, emotion regulation, intergroup relations, normative processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review