Cited by 110Gender Diversity and InequalitySocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

You've Come a Long Way…Maybe: How Moral Emotions Trigger Backlash Against Women Leaders

Brescoll, Victoria L., Okimoto, Tyler G., Vial, Andrea C.·2018·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

Despite the progress American women have made in other arenas, they still remain underrepresented in top leadership positions in both the public and private sectors, thus contributing to their marginalized status in these domains. Although people do not expect to encounter women in positions of power, a solely cognitive process cannot fully account for the negative interpersonal characterizations and poor leadership evaluations (i.e., backlash) that female leaders disproportionately receive. Rather, recent evidence suggests that because female leaders are seen as gender norm deviants who threaten the gender status hierarchy, the backlash they encounter more likely constitutes a motivated process whereby perceivers’ negative evaluations stem from a desire to maintain the status quo (i.e., gender inequality). Here, we expand on this work by proposing that a desire to defend the gender hierarchy causes people to feel negative moral emotions when encountering powerful women who display dominance and/or agency which, in turn, causes backlash effects against such individuals. Study 1 finds that morally laden negative affect explains why evaluators penalize dominant female leaders, but not dominant male leaders. Studies 2 and 3 then manipulate this mediator via the use of use disgust primes. Given that embodied disgust amplifies moral judgment severity, we hypothesized that if moral emotions underlie gender backlash, enhanced feelings of disgust should result in harsher penalties for leaders in gender‐ in congruent roles than those in gender‐congruent roles as only the former violate core gender norms that undermine the status quo. Indeed, compared to a neutral prime, disgust primes (taste in Study 2, visual in Study 3) resulted in lower leadership evaluations and liking of only the gender deviant targets. We discuss the implications of these findings for organizational interventions and female leaders’ impression management strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/josi.12261

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gender stereotypes have negative implications in business and political spheres, leading to disqualification of women and undermining their dignity.

    “Such stereotypes have had negative implications in both business and political spheres (Alcaraz Marin & Vásquez Parra, 2020;Brescoll et al., 2018;Lozano Suárez, 2018;Zaragoza, 2020), often leading to the disqualification of women and the undermining of their dignity (Cook & Cusack, 2009).”

    From Barriers to Leadership: Experiences of Women Leaders in Business and Politics (2024) · cites this paper as Brescoll et al., 2018

  • When women step outside their traditionally assigned roles of care and reproduction, they are regarded as a threat to the traditional figure of authority, commonly provoking attitudes of disdain and aversion.

    “These beliefs imply that when women step outside their traditionally assigned roles of care and reproduction (Brescoll et al., 2018), they are regarded as a threat to the traditional figure of authority, commonly provoking attitudes of disdain and aversion.”

    From Barriers to Leadership: Experiences of Women Leaders in Business and Politics (2024) · cites this paper as Brescoll et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brescoll, V. L., Okimoto, T. G., & Vial, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Brescoll, Victoria L.
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
144-164
ISSN
  • 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4560
OpenAlex
W2795930881
Cited by
110
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8
FWCI
14.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
moral emotions, disgust, gender norms, gender hierarchy, women in leadership, leadership assessment, dominance, agency, gender inequality, status quo maintenance, impression management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review