Cited by 426Gender Diversity and InequalityGender and Feminist StudiesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders

Brescoll, Victoria L.·2016·The Leadership Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.005

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women are expected to exhibit sensitive and affective behaviors, which are perceived as contradictory in positions of power.

    “For example, women are usually expected to exhibit sensitive and affective behaviors, which are perceived as contradictory in positions of power (Brescoll, 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 114 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brescoll, V. L.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Brescoll, Victoria L.
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
415-428
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2343338555
Cited by
426
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 4
FWCI
58.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
women in leadership, emotional expressivity, emotional display, gender and emotion, leadership assessment, emotional dominance, race and ethnicity, gender bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review