Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies: Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined
Abstract
In this article we analyze data from high‐quality surveys conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom that included multiple symbolic and operational measures of political ideology and psychological orientations. Our overarching goal is to elucidate the nature of conceptual and empirical connections between neoliberalism and social conservatism. In so doing, we revisit three major questions about public opinion in neoliberal societies: (1) Are ordinary citizens “innocent” of ideology? (2) Are social and economic dimensions of ideology structurally and functionally independent? (3) Are support for laissez‐faire capitalism and opposition to welfare—hallmarks of neoliberal ideology—unrelated or negatively related to authoritarianism? In contrast to previous investigations relying upon fewer and poorer measures, we found that ordinary citizens do indeed hold coherent political attitudes, and their attitudes about social and economic issues are closely aligned. For instance, we observed that for five previously published ideological instruments, social and economic attitudes were robustly correlated in two large U.S. samples (withrs ranging from .40 to .69)—for respondents who were relatively low (.31 ≤r≤ .60) as well as high in political sophistication (.50 ≤r≤ .77). Contradicting prior claims, we found no evidence that support for the free market was negatively associated with authoritarianism for any group of respondents or any measure of authoritarianism. On the cont…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The decline in Republican support for governmental regulation of the economy reflects economic system justification, that is, the conservative defence of increasing inequality as fair and legitimate under the neoliberal regime.
“Presumably, this reflects economic system justification, that is, the conservative defence of increasing inequality as fair and legitimate under the neoliberal regime101,107,176–181.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [179]
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619 · see citing works
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them
Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920952393 · Cited by 969 · see citing works
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12251 · Cited by 831 · see citing works
Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802110007 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
The Polarization of Contemporary American Politics
Hare, C., & Poole, K. T. (2014) · Polity · doi:10.1057/pol.2014.10 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Self-citationAzevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430221990104 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T., & Sterling, J.
- Affiliations
- New York University
- New York University (US)
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jost, John T.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-22
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-88
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2916856418
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 10
- FWCI
- 116.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Keywords
- neoliberalism, political ideology, social conservatism, economic conservatism, authoritarianism, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, system justification, welfare attitudes, political sophistication, public opinion, United States, United Kingdom
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review