Cited by 207Social Policy and Reform StudiesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyGlobalization and political ideologies

Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies: Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined

Azevedo, Flavio, Jost, John T., Rothmund, Tobias, Sterling, Joanna·2019·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

In this article we analyze data from high‐quality surveys conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom that included multiple symbolic and operational measures of political ideology and psychological orientations. Our overarching goal is to elucidate the nature of conceptual and empirical connections between neoliberalism and social conservatism. In so doing, we revisit three major questions about public opinion in neoliberal societies: (1) Are ordinary citizens “innocent” of ideology? (2) Are social and economic dimensions of ideology structurally and functionally independent? (3) Are support for laissez‐faire capitalism and opposition to welfare—hallmarks of neoliberal ideology—unrelated or negatively related to authoritarianism? In contrast to previous investigations relying upon fewer and poorer measures, we found that ordinary citizens do indeed hold coherent political attitudes, and their attitudes about social and economic issues are closely aligned. For instance, we observed that for five previously published ideological instruments, social and economic attitudes were robustly correlated in two large U.S. samples (withrs ranging from .40 to .69)—for respondents who were relatively low (.31 ≤r≤ .60) as well as high in political sophistication (.50 ≤r≤ .77). Contradicting prior claims, we found no evidence that support for the free market was negatively associated with authoritarianism for any group of respondents or any measure of authoritarianism. On the cont…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/josi.12310

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The decline in Republican support for governmental regulation of the economy reflects economic system justification, that is, the conservative defence of increasing inequality as fair and legitimate under the neoliberal regime.

    “Presumably, this reflects economic system justification, that is, the conservative defence of increasing inequality as fair and legitimate under the neoliberal regime101,107,176–181.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T., & Sterling, J.
Affiliations
  • New York University
  • New York University (US)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Jost, John T.
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-22
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
49-88
ISSN
  • 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4560
OpenAlex
W2916856418
Cited by
207
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 10
FWCI
116.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
Keywords
neoliberalism, political ideology, social conservatism, economic conservatism, authoritarianism, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, system justification, welfare attitudes, political sophistication, public opinion, United States, United Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review