Minding Theory of Mind
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The stereotype that autistic people are mindblind is still systematically used to dismiss the validity of autistic voices, although the theory has been shown untenable and rooted in prejudice.
“Although this theory has been shown to be untenable (Chapman, 2019b) and rooted in prejudice (Yergeau & Huebner, 2017), it is still systematically used to dismiss the validity of autistic voices (Yergeau, 2018).”
From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Yergeau & Huebner, 2017
Cites
Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ?
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8 · Cited by 8,599 · see citing works
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
Longino, H. E. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9780691209753 · Cited by 3,092 · see citing works
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.010 · Cited by 1,592 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life
Chapman, R., & Carel, H. (2022) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12456 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yergeau, M., & Huebner, B.
- ORCID
- Huebner, Bryce
- Venue
- Journal of Social Philosophy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 273-296
- ISSN
- 0047-2786 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9833
- OpenAlex
- W2753615013
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- theory of mind, social cognition, folk psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
