Cited by 13Silymarin and Mushroom PoisoningPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

In-vitro stability and metabolism of a tacrine–silibinin codrug

Zenger, Katharina, Chen, Xinyu, Decker, Michael, Kraus, Birgit·2013·Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Abstract

Objectives: A tacrine-silibinin codrug showed promising results in pharmacological and toxicity testing, superior to an equimolar mixture of tacrine and silibinin. The aim of this study was to get more information about its stability, possible degradation products, metabolites, and especially its active principle in vitro and in vivo. Methods: The stability of the codrug was analysed under in-vitro assay conditions. Additionally, its metabolism was investigated using pooled human liver microsomes. Metabolites were identified via liquid chromatography-high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Furthermore, the influence of one of the main cleavage products, tacrine hemi succinamide, on viability and mitochondria of hepatic stellate cells was analysed. Key findings: The codrug remained stable in culture medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium) over an incubation period of 24 h, whereas exposition to microsomal enzymes led to rapid cleavage of the ester bond to form silibinin and a tacrine hemi succinamide. In addition, glucuronidated metabolites of both silibinin and the codrug were detected. For the tacrine hemi succinamide, no effects were observed with regard to cell viability and mitochondrial impairment. Conclusions: This study helps understand and interpret previous results concerning the effects and the absence of toxicity of the tacrine–silibinin codrug and supplies important information for further identification of the active principles of the codrug in vivo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jphp.12070

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zenger, K., Chen, X., Decker, M., & Kraus, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Kraus, Birgit
Venue
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Published
2013-12-01
Volume
65
Issue
12
Pages
1765-1772
ISSN
  • 0022-3573 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7158
OpenAlex
W1523091045
Cited by
13
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
German Research Foundation (DFG DE1546/6-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Silymarin and Mushroom Poisoning
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
tacrine, silibinin, drug stability, drug metabolism, human liver microsomes, glucuronidation, ester bond cleavage, hepatic stellate cells, mitochondrial toxicity, drug toxicity
MeSH terms
Silybin, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Culture Media, Drug Combinations, Drug Stability, Humans, Microsomes, Liver, Mitochondria, Silymarin, Tacrine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review