The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Value Creation and Value Capture Alignment in Business Model Innovation: A Process View on Outcome‐Based Business Models
Open accessAbstract
Industrial manufacturers are innovating their business models by shifting from selling products to selling outcome‐based services, where the provider (manufacturer) guarantees to deliver the performance outcomes of the products and services. This form of business model innovation requires a profound yet little understood shift in how value is created, delivered, and captured. To address this research gap, our study examines two successful and four unsuccessful cases of this shift. We find that effectiveness in business model innovation hinges on the three process phases that unfold in collaboration with the customers: value proposition definition, value provision design, and value‐in‐use delivery. We also find that that success is determined by the alignment of specific value creation and value capture activities in each phase: identifying value creation opportunities—agreeing on value distribution in value proposition definition, designing the value offering—deciding on the profit formula in the value provision design, and finally refining value creation processes—regulating incentive structures in the value‐in‐use delivery. Our process model contributes to the literature and practice on business model innovation by providing a thorough understanding of how alignment of value creation and value capture processes is ensured, whilst paying special attention to their interdependence and the interactions between provider and customer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,535
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 · Cited by 13,227
Building theories from case study research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009) · STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI · doi:10.3280/so2008-002004 · Cited by 11,299
Business models, business strategy and innovation
Teece, D. J. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003 · Cited by 8,335
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“In order to avoid respondent bias that could lead to confusion about cause and effect relationships (Leonard-Barton, 1990), we triangulated our data by applying multiple data collection techniques, including multiple interviews, secondary data, and a review of documents (Jick, 1979).”
MethodBusiness Model Generation : A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · Cited by 6,869
Cited by
Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Palmié, M., & Wincent, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.009 · Cited by 584
Self-citationValue creation and value capture for AI business model innovation: a three-phase process framework
Åström, J., Reim, W., & Parida, V. (2022) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-022-00521-z · Cited by 195
Self-citationIndustry’s 4.0 transformation process: How to start, where to aim, what to be aware of
Calabrese, A., Dora, M., Levialdi Ghiron, N., & Tiburzi, L. (2022) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1830315 · Cited by 109
Blurring the lines between physical and digital spaces: business model innovation in retailing
Jocevski, M. (2020) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125620953639 · Cited by 97
Rittershaus, P., Aryan, V., & Renner, M. (2025) · WIREs Energy and Environment · doi:10.1002/wene.70006 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Jovanovic, M., & Visnjic, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-27
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 158-183
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W2996875104
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 49.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value Creation and Value Capture Alignment in Business Model Innovation: A Process View on Outcome‐Based Business Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jpim.12516
- The paper
- Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Jovanovic, M., & Visnjic, I. (2020). Value Creation and Value Capture Alignment in Business Model Innovation: A Process View on Outcome‐Based Business Models. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.