The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drivers of Supplier Sustainability: Moving Beyond Compliance to Commitment
Abstract
Mounting pressure for sustainable business practices has led to a greatly increased focus on highlighting sustainability drivers throughout the supply chain. While the literature has concentrated on why downstream original equipment manufacturers (OEM s) and retailers become “sustainable,” much less is known regarding why and how upstream suppliers implement sustainability practices. Based on findings from a cross‐case analysis of eight first‐tier (FT) suppliers and an integration of resource dependency theory (RDT), this study explores the drivers and mechanisms of FT supplier engagement in sustainable supply chain management. Suppliers need to understand the sustainability priorities of customers and stakeholders to derive the effective focus and depth of further upstream integration with subsuppliers. Therefore, the integration between the two functions that manage the relevant external interfaces, namely marketing (downstream and stakeholder communication) and procurement (upstream), appears to be the essential cornerstone to move beyond FT supplier compliance to actual commitment to sustainability practices. We present findings on how (1) stakeholder‐related, (2) process‐related, and (3) product‐related drivers influence the choice and effectiveness of the procurement–marketing integration (PM integration) mechanisms. Stakeholder pressures are considered to be the principal drivers of sustainability efforts. However, on their own, they rarely provide sufficient grounds for permanent and embedded PM integration initiatives at FT suppliers. Evidence suggests that suppliers' commitment to PM integration is motivated by the opportunity to leverage sustainability initiatives in their product offerings and sustainability certificates recognizable by customers and secondary stakeholders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,763
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,850
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
(1990) · Cited by 11,110
Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3997 · Cited by 9,014
Męcfal, S. (2012) · University of Lodz Repository (University of Łódź) · Cited by 6,617
Cited by
Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 · Cited by 2,143
Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014 · Cited by 1,545
Managing for Political Corporate Social Responsibility: New Challenges and Directions for PCSR 2.0
Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12203 · Cited by 441
A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations
Nason, R. S., Bacq, S., & Gras, D. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0081 · Cited by 284
The role of supply chains in the global business of forced labour
LeBaron, G. (2021) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12258 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Foerstl, K., Azadegan, A., Leppelt, T., & Hartmann, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Supply Chain Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-30
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-92
- ISSN
- 1055-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-2409
- 1745-493X
- OpenAlex
- W1973728740
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 113
- FWCI
- 39.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drivers of Supplier Sustainability: Moving Beyond Compliance to Commitment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jscm.12067
- The paper
- Foerstl, K., Azadegan, A., Leppelt, T., & Hartmann, E. (2015). Drivers of Supplier Sustainability: Moving Beyond Compliance to Commitment. Journal of Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.