Cited by 36Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyUrological Disorders and Treatments

How Hot Is He? A psychophysiological and psychosocial examination of the arousal patterns of sexually functional and dysfunctional men

Sarin, Sabina, Amsel, Rhonda, Binik, Yitzchak M.·2014·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite much theorizing about the interchangeability of desire and arousal, research has yet to identify whether men with desire vs. arousal disorders can be differentiated based on their psychophysiological patterns of arousal. Additionally, little research has examined the relationship between subjective (SA) and genital arousal (GA) in sexually dysfunctional men. AIMS: To compare patterns of SA and GA in a community sample of men meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), erectile dysfunction (ED), both HSDD and ED (ED/HSDD), and healthy controls. METHODS: Seventy-one men (19 controls, 13 HSDD, 19 ED, 20 ED/HSDD) completed self-report measures and watched two 15-minute film clips (neutral and erotic), while GA and SA were measured both continuously and discretely. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Groups were compared on genital temperature (as an indicator of GA), SA, and psychosocial variables (i.e., body image, emotion regulation, sexual attitudes, sexual inhibition/excitation, mood, and trauma). RESULTS: Genital temperature increased for all groups during the erotic condition, yet men with ED and ED/HSDD showed less GA than men without erectile difficulties. All groups increased in SA during the erotic condition, yet ED/HSDD men reported less SA than controls or ED men. SA and GA were highly correlated for controls, and less strongly correlated for clinical groups; men with ED showed low agreement between SA and GA. Groups also differed on body image, sexual inhibition/excitation, sexual attitudes and alexithymia. CONCLUSION: Low desire vs. arousal sufferers have unique patterns of response, with those with both difficulties showing greatest impairment. Results have important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsm.12562

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarin, S., Amsel, R., & Binik, Y. M.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Sarin, Sabina
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2014-07
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
1725-1740
ISSN
1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1859948173
Cited by
36
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
hypoactive sexual desire disorder, erectile dysfunction, subjective arousal, genital arousal, body image, sexual attitudes, alexithymia, male sexual dysfunction
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Arousal, Body Temperature, Erotica, Hot Temperature, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Inhibition, Psychological, Libido, Male, Penile Erection, Sexual Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review