Cited by 49Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

The dual control model of sexual response: a scoping review, 2009-2022

Open access
Janssen, Erick, Bancroft, John·2023·The Journal of Sex Research

Abstract

The Dual Control Model proposes that sexual arousal and related processes are dependent on the balance between sexual excitation and sexual inhibition, and that individuals vary in their propensity for these processes. This scoping review provides an overview and discussion of the questionnaires used to measure the propensities for sexual excitation and inhibition, their translation and validation in other languages, and their application in empirical research on topics ranging from sexual desire and arousal, sexual (dys)function, sexual risk taking, asexuality, hypersexuality, and sexual aggression. A total of 152 papers, published between 2009 and 2022 and identified using online databases, were included in this review. The findings, consistent with those reviewed by Bancroft et al. (2009), suggest that sexual excitation is particularly relevant to sexual desire and responsivity and predictive of asexuality and hypersexuality. Sexual inhibition plays a role in sexual dysfunction. sexual risk taking, and sexual aggression, although often in interaction with sexual excitation. Suggestions for the further development of the model and for future studies are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224499.2023.2219247

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrative models recognize the influence of the dual control and tipping point models to varying degrees, incorporate other theories (family systems and social learning, cognitive and behavioral, attachment and interpersonal), and address sociocultural influences (moral incongruence, erotic conflicts, and minority stress).

    “Again, to varying degrees, they recognize the influence of the dual control73,145 and tipping point models74,146 but incorporate other theories (eg, family systems and social learning, cognitive and behavioral, attachment and interpersonal15,102) and address the importance of sociocultural influences (eg, moral incongruence,14,59,60 erotic conflicts, and minority stress143).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janssen, E., & Bancroft, J.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Janssen, Erick
Venue
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2023-06-02
Volume
60
Issue
7
Pages
948-968
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
OpenAlex
W4379140477
Cited by
49
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (K801522N)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
dual control model, sexual excitation, sexual inhibition, sexual desire, sexual arousal, asexuality, hypersexuality, sexual dysfunction, sexual risk behavior, sexual aggression, questionnaire validation, cross-cultural translation
MeSH terms
Humans, Libido, Paraphilic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review