Cited by 39Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSleep and related disorders

Nocturnal nasal obstruction is frequent and reduces sleep quality in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Open access
Värendh, Maria, Andersson, Morgan, Bjørnsdottir, Erla, Hrubos‐Strøm, Harald, Johannisson, Arne, Arnardottir, Erna S., Gislason, Thorarinn, Juliusson, Sigurdur·2018·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

Summary: The prevalence and consequences of nasal obstruction in untreated obstructive sleep apnea patients are not known. The study objectives were to investigate the frequency of subjective and objective nasal obstruction in untreated sleep apnea patients and the associations with sleep and quality of life. Patients in the Icelandic Sleep Apnea Cohort were subjected to a type 3 sleep study, answered questionnaires and had their nasal dimensions measured by acoustic rhinometry. In total, 810 patients participated (including 153 females), aged 54.5 ± 10.6 years [mean ± standard deviation (SD)] with an apnea/hypopnea index 44.7 ± 20.7 h−1. Nocturnal nasal obstruction (greater than or equal to three times per week) was reported by 35% of the patients. These patients had smaller nasal dimensions measured by the minimum cross‐sectional area within the smaller nasal valve (0.42 ± 0.17 versus 0.45 ± 0.16 cm 2, P = 0.013), reported more daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score 12.5 ± 4.9 versus 10.8 ± 5.0; P < 0.001) and slightly lower mental quality of life than patients without nocturnal nasal obstruction. Nocturnal nasal obstruction is reported in one‐third of the sleep apnea patients and they are more likely to suffer from daytime sleepiness and slightly reduced quality of life than other sleep apnea patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.12631

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple observational studies found that increased objective nasal resistance on anterior rhinomanometry predicted nasal PAP intolerability.

    “Multiple observational studies found that increased objective nasal resistance on anterior rhinomanometry was predictive of nasal PAP intolerability.544,1169”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1169]

    The Methods (Acoustic rhinometry; page unavailable) describe measuring nasal dimensions with acoustic rhinometry, not nasal resistance with anterior rhinomanometry. The study assessed patients before PAP treatment and examined nasal obstruction, sleep symptoms, and quality of life; searches for rhinomanometry and PAP intolerance or adherence found no passage reporting that nasal resistance predicted PAP intolerability. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Värendh, M., Andersson, M., Bjørnsdottir, E., Hrubos‐Strøm, H., Johannisson, A., Arnardottir, E. S., Gislason, T., & Juliusson, S.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Department of Respiratory Medicine and Sleep Landspitali – The National University Hospital of Iceland Reykjavík Iceland
  • Akershus University Hospital (NO)
  • Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Landspitali – The National University Hospital of Iceland Reykjavík Reykjavík Iceland
Corresponding author
Värendh, Maria
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-06
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
e12631-e12631
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W2767591090
Cited by
39
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hirsla (Landspítali University Hospital) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01HL072067)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, acoustic rhinometry, daytime sleepiness, quality of life, sleep quality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Iceland, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Cohort Studies, Nasal Obstruction, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review