Technology-Mediated Second Language Vocabulary Development: A Review of Trends in Research Methodology
Open accessAbstract
Technology-mediated vocabulary development (TMVD) in a second language (L2) covers a wide range of instructional and learning treatments, contexts and technologies, and is situated in a broader field of second language vocabulary learning. Vocabulary knowledge is a complex, multidimensional construct that has been interpreted and categorized in second language research in many different ways. This review identifies methodological practices in research into L2 TMVD and provides a synthesis of learning and instructional approaches, aspects of vocabulary knowledge being investigated and measures of vocabulary development used in this research. A sample of 82 primary studies from 2010 to 2017 was selected and coded for target methodological features. The results of the review show that TMVD research has achieved a certain degree of methodological maturity, while a number of issues have also been identified. These issues include: the practice of comparing technology-mediated instruction with ‘traditional’ instruction without technology; insufficient reporting of participants’ L2 proficiency; and a dearth of treatments targeting fluency development. The review also showed a preference for evaluating the knowledge of individual vocabulary items rather than the development of the L2 lexicon, and insufficient use of online and implicit measures of vocabulary knowledge. Recommendations for future TMVD research are provided.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vocabulary development progresses differently for low- and high-proficiency learners, even when level-appropriate L2 input is used.
“as Elgort [75] states, 'vocabulary development progresses differently for low-and highproficiency learners, even when level-appropriate L2 input is used'”
From The Effect of Multiplayer Video Games on Incidental and Intentional L2 Vocabulary Learning: The Case of Among Us (2021) · cites this paper as [75]
A higher knowledge in English would have resulted in greater vocabulary gains.
“In general, it is believed that a higher knowledge in English would have resulted in greater vocabulary gains, since, as Elgort [75] states, 'vocabulary development progresses differently for low-and highproficiency learners, even when level-appropriate L2 input is used'”
From The Effect of Multiplayer Video Games on Incidental and Intentional L2 Vocabulary Learning: The Case of Among Us (2021) · cites this paper as [75]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Learning Vocabulary in Another Language
Nation, I. S. P. (2001) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524759 · Cited by 6,608 · see citing works
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
Wray, A. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511519772 · Cited by 2,873 · see citing works
Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension
Perfetti, C. (2007) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888430701530730 · Cited by 2,095 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The differences in the developmental trajectories are associated with quality of lexical representations (Perfetti, 2007) and quality of L2 lexical-semantic networks, at different proficiencies (Elgort et al., 2015; Elgort & Piasecki, 2014).”
BackgroundReview article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Schmitt, N. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089921 · Cited by 1,467 · see citing works
Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0 · Cited by 1,338 · cited 1× · see citing works
“VK may be elicited by administering tasks that present target words or multi-word units in isolation (e.g., LexTALE , by Lemhöfer & Broersma, 2012), in limited contexts (e.g., VST, by Nation & Beglar, 2007), or by observing and analyzing real linguistic behavior and artifacts produced by language…”
BackgroundRead, J. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511732942 · Cited by 1,305 · see citing works
Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553220101800103 · Cited by 1,211 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…using standardized language proficiency tests: TOEFL (n = 11), CERF (n = 10), TOEIC (n = 6), Cambridge English Proficiency tests (n = 2), Oxford English Placement Test (n = 1); and VK tests: The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (n = 3) and Vocabulary Levels Test (Schmitt, Schmitt, & Clapham, 2001).”
MethodAssessing Second Language Vocabulary Knowledge: Depth Versus Breadth
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13 · Cited by 673 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Vocabulary knowledge is a multidimensional construct that has been understood and categorized in L2 education research in many different ways (Elgort & Nation, 2010; Henriksen, 1999; Read, 2004; Wesche & Paribakht, 1996).”
BackgroundCorpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta‐Analysis
Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12224 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
THREE DIMENSIONS OF VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT
Henriksen, B. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199002089 · Cited by 553 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Vocabulary knowledge is a multidimensional construct that has been understood and categorized in L2 education research in many different ways (Elgort & Nation, 2010; Henriksen, 1999; Read, 2004; Wesche & Paribakht, 1996).”
BackgroundNation, P. (2007) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.2167/illt039.0 · Cited by 494 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Nation (2007) proposed that, in a well-designed language-learning curriculum, equal amounts of time should be spent on activities representing the following four learning strands: meaning-focused input (MFI, e.g., extensive listening and reading), meaning-focused output (MFO, e.g., speaking,…”
BackgroundGaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners
Sylvén, L. K., & Sundqvist, P. (2012) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s095834401200016x · Cited by 468 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2016), intercultural exchanges (e.g., Lin, 2016) and other CMC studies (e.g., Kozar, 2016; Yilmaz & Yuksel, 2011), and longitudinal studies (e.g., Chukharev-Hudilainen & Klepikova, 2016; Gobel & Kano, 2014) or studies of extramural language use (e.g., Jensen, 2017; Sylven & Sundqvist, 2012).”
BackgroundUsing mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of platform
Stockwell, G. (2010) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44216 · Cited by 455 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The latter were studies that incorporated mobile-assisted language learning (e.g., Amer, 2014; Andu-jar, 2016; Stockwell, 2010; Terantino, 2016), intercultural exchanges (e.g., Lin, 2016) and other CMC studies (e.g., Kozar, 2016; Yilmaz & Yuksel, 2011), and longitudinal studies (e.g.,…”
BackgroundNeural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change.
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1264 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use
Wood, D., & Schmitt, N. (2006) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/40264535 · Cited by 355 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A closer examination suggests that over half of the KoU codes were associated with the measures of collocational aspect of word knowledge, which is a growing area of interest in second language vocabulary research (Schmitt, 2004; Wray, 2002).”
BackgroundCaptioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis
Montero Perez, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P. (2013) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.07.013 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Plonsky (2013) · doi:10.1017/s0272263113000399 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Abraham, L. B. (2008) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220802090246 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
7. RESEARCH IN TEACHING VOCABULARY
Read, J. (2004) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190504000078 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Deliberate Learning and Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language
Elgort, I. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00613.x · Cited by 257 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…Boers, & Housen, 2013) or task completion (Michel & Smith, 2017; Smith, 2012), recognition, processing, and retrieval times in priming manipulations (Elgort, 2011; Elgort & Piasecki, 2014), or neurological markers of lexical processing, such as N400 (Elgort, Perfetti, Rickles, & Stafura, 2015;…”
BackgroundSelf-citationModality of input and vocabulary acquisition
Syodorenko, T. (2010) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44214 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Task-Based Learner Production: A Substantive and Methodological Review
Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190516000015 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
From Dissertation to Publications
Oskoz, A., & Smith, B. (2017) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.29519 · Cited by 229 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2016), intercultural exchanges (e.g., Lin, 2016) and other CMC studies (e.g., Kozar, 2016; Yilmaz & Yuksel, 2011), and longitudinal studies (e.g., Chukharev-Hudilainen & Klepikova, 2016; Gobel & Kano, 2014) or studies of extramural language use (e.g., Jensen, 2017; Sylven & Sundqvist, 2012).”
BackgroundEffects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2014) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44357 · Cited by 223 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…tools, such as digital glosses and dictionaries (e.g., Hu, Vongpumivitch, Chang, & Liou, 2014; Türk & Erçetin, 2014) and video-based activities with different types of captioning, subtitling, or audio support (e.g., Mohsen, 2016; Montero Perez, Peters, Clarebout, & Desmet, 2014; Sydo-renko, 2010).”
MethodCONTEXTUAL WORD LEARNING DURING READING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE
Elgort, I., Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., & Assche, E. V. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263117000109 · Cited by 223 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…aspects of language processing that are not available to learners’ conscious control or report, such as their eye-movements during reading (Elgort, Brysbaert, Stevens, & Van Assche, 2017; Godfroid, Boers, & Housen, 2013) or task completion (Michel & Smith, 2017; Smith, 2012), recognition,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe CALL-SLA interface: Insights from a second-order synthesis
Plonsky, L., & Ziegler, N. (2016) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44459 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC
Smith, B. (2012) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44300 · Cited by 177 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…during reading (Elgort, Brysbaert, Stevens, & Van Assche, 2017; Godfroid, Boers, & Housen, 2013) or task completion (Michel & Smith, 2017; Smith, 2012), recognition, processing, and retrieval times in priming manipulations (Elgort, 2011; Elgort & Piasecki, 2014), or neurological markers…”
Benefits of mobile instant messaging to develop ESL writing
Andújar, A. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.07.004 · Cited by 166 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Studies that incorporated real language use tended to cover more knowledge aspects (e.g., five aspects: Milton et al., 2012; four aspects: Andujar, 2016; Rusanganwa, 2013; Seedhouse et al., 2013).”
BackgroundPredicting the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2011) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/0265532211419331 · Cited by 163 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…contexts (e.g., VST, by Nation & Beglar, 2007), or by observing and analyzing real linguistic behavior and artifacts produced by language learners, for example, by measuring lexical richness or lexical diversity in writing (Crossley, Salsbury, & McNamara, 2012) or online chat (Sauro & Smith, 2010).”
BackgroundIncidental Learning in Second Language Acquisition
Hulstijn, J. H. (2012) · The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0530 · Cited by 136 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Following Hulstijn (2013), vocabulary learning is considered incidental if it is not the primary focus of the activity in which a person is engaged.”
The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a meta-analysis
Yun, J. H. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.523285 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Investigating L2 Performance in Text Chat
Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2010) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amq007 · Cited by 117 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…contexts (e.g., VST, by Nation & Beglar, 2007), or by observing and analyzing real linguistic behavior and artifacts produced by language learners, for example, by measuring lexical richness or lexical diversity in writing (Crossley, Salsbury, & McNamara, 2012) or online chat (Sauro & Smith, 2010).”
BackgroundComputer-Assisted Second Language Vocabulary Instruction: A Meta-Analysis
Chiu, Y. (2013) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01342.x · Cited by 108 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In a meta-analysis of studies on computer-assisted L2 vocabulary instruction, Chiu (2013) reported a larger effect size for learning L2 vocabulary without the help of a teacher ( d = 1.379, p = 0.001) than with teacher aid ( d = 0.214, p = 0.068).”
BackgroundInfluentialKember, D. R. (2003) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930301684 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Türk, E., & Erçetin, G. (2012) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.692384 · Cited by 99 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…were reading studies with access to reference tools, such as digital glosses and dictionaries (e.g., Hu, Vongpumivitch, Chang, & Liou, 2014; Türk & Erçetin, 2014) and video-based activities with different types of captioning, subtitling, or audio support (e.g., Mohsen, 2016; Montero Perez,…”
MethodA comparative study of Facebook vs. paper-and-pencil writing to improve L2 writing skills
Dizon, G. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1266369 · Cited by 83 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Dizon (2016), for example, investigated Facebook-mediated writing development, using focused freewriting, in which participants received peer feedback.”
BackgroundInferential statistics in Language Teaching Research : A review and ways forward
Lindstromberg, S. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816649979 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Data-driven learning of collocations: Learner performance, proficiency, and perceptions
Vyatkina, N. (2016) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44487 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Vyatkina (2016), for example, used DDL for teaching lexico-grammatical constructions in German; the con-trol group followed a deductive presentation-practice-production approach using rule-based textbook exercises with a pair discussion at the end (MFO + LF), while the experimental group engaged in…”
MethodElgort, I., Perfetti, C. A., Rickles, B., & Stafura, J. Z. (2015) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.942673 · Cited by 72 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…(Michel & Smith, 2017; Smith, 2012), recognition, processing, and retrieval times in priming manipulations (Elgort, 2011; Elgort & Piasecki, 2014), or neurological markers of lexical processing, such as N400 (Elgort, Perfetti, Rickles, & Stafura, 2015; McLaugh-lin, Osterhout, & Kim, 2004).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCobb, T., & Horst, M. (2011) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.28.3.639-661 · Cited by 67 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It also appears that opportunities for fluency development are not prioritized in the reviewed studies; there was only one study (Cobb & Horst, 2011) that explicitly emphasized fluency development in the treatment description (in the form of “lexical access speed practice”).”
BackgroundMethodThe Effect of a Simple Simulation Game on Long-Term Vocabulary Retention
Franciosi, S. J., Yagi, J., Tomoshige, Y., & Ye, S. (2015) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v33i2.26063 · Cited by 58 · cited 3× · see citing works
“For example, in a study that examined the effect of playing a simulation game on vocabulary retention (Franciosi et al., 2016), the treatment group used an online vocabulary learning application (Quizlet) in conjunction with playing the 3rd World Farmer game (DL+C), while the control group only…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialForeign language vocabulary development through activities in an online 3D environment
Milton, J., Jonsen, S., Hirst, S., & Lindenburn, S. (2012) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2012.658229 · Cited by 58 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…in two observational, qualitative studies, one of which examined vocabulary learning opportunities afforded by a virtual 3D learning environment (Milton, Jonsen, Hirst, & Lindenburn, 2012) and the other examined the nature of preschool-aged children’s use of iPads for independent language…”
BackgroundEffects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A first exposure study
Yılmaz, Y., & Yüksel, D. (2011) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168811412873 · Cited by 55 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…Amer, 2014; Andu-jar, 2016; Stockwell, 2010; Terantino, 2016), intercultural exchanges (e.g., Lin, 2016) and other CMC studies (e.g., Kozar, 2016; Yilmaz & Yuksel, 2011), and longitudinal studies (e.g., Chukharev-Hudilainen & Klepikova, 2016; Gobel & Kano, 2014) or studies of extramural language…”
Computer-mediated communication (CMC) in L2 oral proficiency development: A meta-analysis
Lin, H. (2014) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s095834401400041x · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Vocabulary Learning in a Second Language: Familiar Answers to New Questions
Elgort, I., & Nation, P. (2010) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230289772_6 · Cited by 43 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Vocabulary knowledge is a multidimensional construct that has been understood and categorized in L2 education research in many different ways (Elgort & Nation, 2010; Henriksen, 1999; Read, 2004; Wesche & Paribakht, 1996).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMultimedia as a means to enhance teaching technical vocabulary to physics undergraduates in Rwanda
Rusanganwa, J. (2012) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2012.07.002 · Cited by 42 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Studies that incorporated real language use tended to cover more knowledge aspects (e.g., five aspects: Milton et al., 2012; four aspects: Andujar, 2016; Rusanganwa, 2013; Seedhouse et al., 2013).”
BackgroundThe types and effects of peer native speakers’ feedback on CMC
Díez-Bedmar, M. B., & Pérez-Paredes, P. (2012) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44275 · Cited by 39 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another group of studies that used IL+S treatments was CMC studies with peer-or instructor-generated feedback (e.g., Diez-Bedmar & Perez-Paredes, 2012; Dizon, 2016).”
BackgroundEsit, Ö. (2011) · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.538702 · Cited by 39 · cited 1×
“Four aspects of knowledge were also evaluated in a study that used self-report measures (Esit, 2011) and in a longitudinal study that used a battery of observational and empirical tests with school children (Cobb & Horst, 2011).”
MethodA Review of the Types of CALL Programs for Vocabulary Instruction.
Goodfellow, R. (1995) · doi:10.1080/0958822940080206 · Cited by 39
A Study of Learners’ Usage of a Mobile Learning Application for Learning Idioms and Collocations
Amer, M. (2014) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.31.3.285-302 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The latter were studies that incorporated mobile-assisted language learning (e.g., Amer, 2014; Andu-jar, 2016; Stockwell, 2010; Terantino, 2016), intercultural exchanges (e.g., Lin, 2016) and other CMC studies (e.g., Kozar, 2016; Yilmaz & Yuksel, 2011), and longitudinal studies (e.g.,…”
BackgroundEffects of help options in a multimedia listening environment on L2 vocabulary acquisition
Mohsen, M. A. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1210645 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…tools, such as digital glosses and dictionaries (e.g., Hu, Vongpumivitch, Chang, & Liou, 2014; Türk & Erçetin, 2014) and video-based activities with different types of captioning, subtitling, or audio support (e.g., Mohsen, 2016; Montero Perez, Peters, Clarebout, & Desmet, 2014; Sydo-renko, 2010).”
MethodComputer assisted English language learning in Costa Rican elementary schools: an experimental study
Álvarez-Marinelli, H., Blanco, M., Lara-Alecio, R., Irby, B. J., Tong, F., Stanley, K., & Fan, Y. (2016) · doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.903977 · Cited by 32 · cited 2×
“Alvarez-Marinelli et al. (2016), for example, compared two experimental CALL curricula with an established teacher-only national English language development curriculum.”
BackgroundChukharev-Hudilainen, E., & Klepikova, T. (2014) · CALICO journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v33i3.26055 · Cited by 31 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2016), intercultural exchanges (e.g., Lin, 2016) and other CMC studies (e.g., Kozar, 2016; Yilmaz & Yuksel, 2011), and longitudinal studies (e.g., Chukharev-Hudilainen & Klepikova, 2016; Gobel & Kano, 2014) or studies of extramural language use (e.g., Jensen, 2017; Sylven & Sundqvist, 2012).”
BackgroundGordani, Y. (2012) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.685078 · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Gordani (2013) investigated the effect integrating an online corpus-based learning into reading comprehension classes and found that it had a positive effect on vocabulary development, compared to the text-book only approach.”
BackgroundHu, S.-M., Vongpumivitch, V., Chang, J. S., & Liou, H.-C. (2014) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344013000244 · Cited by 24 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Two main types of studies that used IL+S treatments were reading studies with access to reference tools, such as digital glosses and dictionaries (e.g., Hu, Vongpumivitch, Chang, & Liou, 2014; Türk & Erçetin, 2014) and video-based activities with different types of captioning, subtitling, or audio support (e.g., Mohse…”
MethodElgort, I., & Piasecki, A. (2014) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728913000588 · Cited by 24 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…2013) or task completion (Michel & Smith, 2017; Smith, 2012), recognition, processing, and retrieval times in priming manipulations (Elgort, 2011; Elgort & Piasecki, 2014), or neurological markers of lexical processing, such as N400 (Elgort, Perfetti, Rickles, & Stafura, 2015; McLaugh-lin,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationWiki and digital video use in strategic interaction-based experiential EFL learning.
deHaan, J., Johnson, N. H., Yoshimura, N., et al. (2012) · doi:10.11139/cj.29.2.249-268 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“…(2016) study that investigated the effect of mobile instant messaging (using WhatsApp) on the accuracy and complexity of students’ writing, and DeHaan, Johnson, Yoshimura, and Kondo (2012) who investigated the effect of using wikis on the development of oral communication skills in a…”
BackgroundTerantino, J. (2016) · doi:10.1558/cj.v33i2.26072 · Cited by 20 · cited 2×
“…qualitative studies, one of which examined vocabulary learning opportunities afforded by a virtual 3D learning environment (Milton, Jonsen, Hirst, & Lindenburn, 2012) and the other examined the nature of preschool-aged children’s use of iPads for independent language learning (Terantino, 2016).”
BackgroundText Chat During Video/Audio Conferencing Lessons: Scaffolding or Getting in the Way?
Kozar, O. (2016) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v33i2.26026 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(e.g., Amer, 2014; Andu-jar, 2016; Stockwell, 2010; Terantino, 2016), intercultural exchanges (e.g., Lin, 2016) and other CMC studies (e.g., Kozar, 2016; Yilmaz & Yuksel, 2011), and longitudinal studies (e.g., Chukharev-Hudilainen & Klepikova, 2016; Gobel & Kano, 2014) or studies of…”
The Interplay of Game Design and Pedagogical Mediation in Game-Mediated Japanese Learning
Shintaku, K. (2016) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.2016100103 · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…game-based studies incorporated both incidental learning procedures and supplementary materials that facilitated language learning; for example, Shintaku (2016) explored the interplay of game design and pedagogical mediation for learners of Japanese using a commercial off-the-shelf game with…”
BackgroundThe French Digital Kitchen: Implementing Task-Based Language Teaching Beyond the Classroom
Seedhouse, P., Preston, A., Olivier, P., et al. (2013) · Int. J. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. Teach. · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.2013010104 · Cited by 17 · cited 2×
“Another example is the French Digital Kitchen project; Seedhouse et al. (2013) created a task, in which participants cooked a dish in a real kitchen using utensils with built-in digital sensor technology, following verbal instructions in their L2 (French), with access to L1 translations and…”
BackgroundImplementing a year-long reading while listening program for Japanese University EFL students
Göbel, P., & Kano, M. (2013) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2013.864314 · Cited by 15 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…2016), intercultural exchanges (e.g., Lin, 2016) and other CMC studies (e.g., Kozar, 2016; Yilmaz & Yuksel, 2011), and longitudinal studies (e.g., Chukharev-Hudilainen & Klepikova, 2016; Gobel & Kano, 2014) or studies of extramural language use (e.g., Jensen, 2017; Sylven & Sundqvist, 2012).”
BackgroundEye-Tracking Research in Computer-Mediated Language Learning
Michel, M. C., & Smith, B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_34-1 · Cited by 14 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…such as their eye-movements during reading (Elgort, Brysbaert, Stevens, & Van Assche, 2017; Godfroid, Boers, & Housen, 2013) or task completion (Michel & Smith, 2017; Smith, 2012), recognition, processing, and retrieval times in priming manipulations (Elgort, 2011; Elgort & Piasecki, 2014), or…”
Alghamdi, E. A. (2016) · Int. J. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. Teach. · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.2016010102 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…additional language-focused activities (Mare-fat & Hassanzadeh, 2016), or playing a digital game with and without access to word definitions (Alghamdi, 2016), and studies that compared two different types of technologies, e.g., vocabulary development from playing a digital simulation game…”
BackgroundTeaching/Developing Vocabulary Using ICTs and Digital Resources
Elgort, I. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0735 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationExamining the advantage of a live instructor vs. video in a laboratory study
Caldwell‐Harris, C. L., Goodwin, K. S., Chu, E., & Dahlen, K. (2013) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2013.793690 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Eye-Tracking Research in Computer-Mediated Language Learning
Michel, M. C., & Smith, B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_34 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Development of Multi-word Sequences by Adolescent EFL Learners through Online Interaction
Lin, Y.-L. (2016) · English Today · doi:10.1017/s0266078416000201 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…incorporated mobile-assisted language learning (e.g., Amer, 2014; Andu-jar, 2016; Stockwell, 2010; Terantino, 2016), intercultural exchanges (e.g., Lin, 2016) and other CMC studies (e.g., Kozar, 2016; Yilmaz & Yuksel, 2011), and longitudinal studies (e.g., Chukharev-Hudilainen & Klepikova, 2016;…”
Applying form-focused approaches to L2 vocabulary instruction through podcasts
Marefat, F., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2016) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44484 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Barcroft, J. (2016). Vocabulary in language teaching. New York: Routledge.
- Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 483-517. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000119 · DOI
- Rouhi, A., & Mohebbi, H. (2013). Glosses, spatial intelligence, and L2 vocabulary learning in multimedia context. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of Language Studies, 19, 75-87.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wilde, V. D., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2019) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918001062 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
MALL language learning outcomes: A comprehensive meta-analysis 1994–2019
Burston, J., & Giannakou, K. (2021) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344021000240 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Asother MALL meta-analyses have attested, experimental MALL studies suffer from numerous design-related shortcomings (Burston, 2015; Chwo, Marek & Wu, 2018; Elgort, 2018; Lee, 2019; Shadiev, Liu & Hwang, 2020; Viberg & Grönlund, 2012).”
Theoretical trends of research on technology and L2 vocabulary learning: A systematic review
Yang, X., Kuo, L., Eslami, Z. R., & Moody, S. M. (2021) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-021-00187-8 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“The existing research syntheses have highlighted critical gaps in the field of technology and L2 learning, the first of which is a paucity of studies on PreK-12 L2 learners (Abraham, 2008; Elgort, 2018; Grgurovic et al., 2013; Lin & Lin, 2019).”
BackgroundA methodological review of qualitative research syntheses in CALL: The state-of-the-art
Chong, S. W., & Reinders, H. (2021) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102646 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Vitta, J. P., Nicklin, C., & McLean, S. (2021) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263121000541 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Elgort et al. conducted a simr power analysis with the results from a previous meaning generation task (Elgort, 2017), which were collected from an L2 sample with comparable proficiency and backgrounds to Elgort et al.’s (2020) participants.”
Calvo-Ferrer, J. R., & Belda-Medina, J. (2021) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti5120080 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“In general, it is believed that a higher knowledge in English would have resulted in greater vocabulary gains, since, as Elgort [75] states, ‘vocabulary development progresses differently for low-and highproficiency learners, even when level-appropriate L2 input is used’, especially considering the moderately positive…”
BackgroundInfluentialLearning English vocabulary from word cards: A research synthesis
Lei, Y., & Reynolds, B. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984211 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Learners with lower proficiencies might have to work very hard to learn, which they might consider as a time-consuming task (Elgort, 2017).”
BackgroundHou, J., Lee, J. F., & Doherty, S. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100643 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Quantitative experimental L2 acquisition MALL studies: A critical evaluation of research quality
Burston, J., Athanasiou, A., & Giannakou, K. (2023) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344023000149 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Effectiveness of Type of Feedback and Frequency on Digital Game-Based L2 Vocabulary Acquisition
Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2021) · International Journal of Game-Based Learning · doi:10.4018/ijgbl.2021070103 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Vandenberghe, B., Perez, M. M., Reynvoet, B., & Desmet, P. (2021) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263120000431 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“On the other hand, sensitive measures can also tap into tacit/implicit knowledge (Elgort, 2011; Sonbul & Schmitt, 2013), that is, knowledge that is not available to learners’ conscious control or report (Elgort, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAssessing the Impact of Game Modalities in Second Language Acquisition: ELLE the EndLess LEarner
Johnson, E., Giroux, A., Merritt, D., Vitanova, G., & de Sousa, S. I. J. (2020) · JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science · doi:10.3897/jucs.2020.048 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Meta-analysis studies, [Ebrahimzadeh and Alavi 2016, Elgot 2018] summarize the different types of research on technology-mediated vocabulary learning: specialized CALL software, digital reference resources such as online dictionaries, corporamediated learning, mobile learning, and others.”
Twenty-Five Years of MALL Experimental Implementation Studies
Burston, J., & Athanasiou, A. (2019) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1097-1.ch002 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Hou, J., Lee, J. F., & Doherty, S. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13118 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Methodological recommendations for webcam-based eye tracking: A scoping review
Patterson, A. S., Nicklin, C., & Vitta, J. P. (2025) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100244 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Introduction: A Scoping Review of Second Language Vocabulary Learning in the Wild
Reynolds, B. L. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1490-6_1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Hartshorn, K. J., Hart, J. M., & McMurry, B. L. (2019) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.438 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
4. A Holistic Person-Centred Approach to Mobile-Assisted Language Learning
Peng, H., Jager, S., Thorne, S. L., et al. (2020) · Multilingual Matters eBooks · doi:10.21832/9781788925259-007 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Yang, J., Qi, X., Liu, R., Wang, L., & Sun, B. (2022) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-022-10275-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Most EFL teachers adopt usage-based learning strategies (Elgort, 2017; Lin, 2014) in their regular face-to-face classes as most L1 teachers do.”
BackgroundResearch syntheses in L2 vocabulary research: A scoping review
Al‐Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Nicklin, C. (2022) · Vocabulary Learning and Instruction · doi:10.7820/vli.v11.2.al-hoorie · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A methodological review of qualitative research syntheses in CALL: The state-of-the-artPreprint
Chong, S. W., & Reinders, H. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/r8m5x · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Applications and Analyzes of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing English Vocabulary
Selvi, V. T., & Thirumoorthi, K. (2024) · Recent Research Reviews Journal · doi:10.36548/rrrj.2024.2.002 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kuehnast, M., Schulz, K., & Lüdeling, A. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2416819 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Web-based resources such as large publicly accessible corpora have been applied in different integrative focus-on-form approaches to lexical and morpho-syntactic development (Elgort, 2017; Flowerdew, 2015; Golonka et al., 2014).”
Alastuey, M. C. B., & García, D. N. (2020) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Vandenberghe, B., Perez, M. M., Reynvoet, B., & Desmet, P. (2022) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12324 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kato, S. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/x28gh · Cited by 1 · see citing works
English Vocabulary Learning Through Form-Focused Approaches Using Video Podcasts
Khan, S., Sartaj, S., & Memon, S. (2021) · Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics · doi:10.7176/jlll/78-04
“It refers to any proposed or by-product educational activity designed to encourage language learners to pay attention to language (Elgort, 2017).”
BackgroundUse of Corpus Technologies for the Development of Lexical Skills
Mukhamadiarova, A. F., Caserta, L. F., Kulkova, M. A., et al. (2020) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Vocabulary learning and assessment: A commentary on four studies for JALT vocabulary SIG
Elgort, I. (2020) · Vocabulary Learning and Instruction · doi:10.7820/vli.v09.2.elgort
Self-citationMshvidobadze, T., & Pipia, E. (2021) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · doi:10.19044/esj.2021.v17n33p198
“However, learning vocabulary and focusing on vocabulary development should include “moving beyond single words and direct first language (L1)” and second language (L2) equivalencies (Coxhead, 2015; Elgort, 2017).”
BackgroundVyatkina, N. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351117586-18
“This is, again, in line with current trends in mainstream L2 vocabulary research (Elgort, 2018, pp. 13-14).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAdvanced-Level Foreign Language Acquisition in Experimental MALL Studies
Burston, J. (2024) · Open Journal of Modern Linguistics · doi:10.4236/ojml.2024.143015
Sarıoğlu, M. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3645-8.ch005
Stockwell, G., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009294850.029
Lee, J. H., & Shin, D. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009294850.035
Jalilbayly, O., & Aliyeva, G. (2025) · SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH · doi:10.36719/2789-6919/46/8-13
Heidari, K. (2026) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.3138/calico-2024-0036
- Authors
- Elgort, I.
- Affiliations
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Elgort, Irina
- ORCID
- Elgort, Irina
- Venue
- CALICO Journal
- Published
- 2018-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-29
- ISSN
- 0742-7778 (ISSN-L)
- 2056-9017
- OpenAlex
- W2765338401
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- CALICO Journal (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Victoria University of Wellington
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- second language vocabulary acquisition, research methodology, vocabulary knowledge, technology-mediated instruction, vocabulary development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review