Cited by 49Law, Economics, and Judicial SystemsIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Jurisdiction, Crime, and Development: The Impact of Public Law 280 in Indian Country

Open access

Abstract

Public Law 280 transferred jurisdiction over criminal and civil matters from the federal to state governments in selected parts of Indian country. Where enacted, the law fundamentally altered the pre-existing legal order. Public Law 280 thus provides a unique opportunity to study the impact of legal institutions and their change on socio-economic outcomes. The law's controversial content has attracted interest from legal scholars. However, empirical studies of its impact are scarce and do not address the law's endogenous nature. We examine the law's impact on crime and on economic development in U.S. counties with significant American Indian reservation population. To address the issue of selection of areas subject to Public Law 280, our empirical strategy draws on the law's politico-historical context. We find that the application of Public Law 280 increased crime and lowered incomes. The law's adverse impact is robust and noteworthy in magnitude.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/lasr.12054

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1086/505053 · DOI
  2. Deloria, 1983, American Indians, American Justice
  3. Akee, Randall , Jorgensen, Miriam , & Sunde, Uwe (2012) “Constitutions and Economic Development: Evidence from the American Indian Nations,” IZA Discussion Paper No. 6754. · DOI
  4. Stock, 2005, Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg
  5. Pistor, 2003, Law and Finance in Transition Economies, Economics of Transition, 8
  6. 10.1086/432166 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1515/9781400829828 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2307/840712 · DOI
  9. 10.1257/0002828053828707 · DOI
  10. Tinker, 2011, Is Oklahoma Still Indian Country? ‘Justifiable Expectations’ and Reservation Disestablishment in Murphy v. Sirmons and Osage Nation v. Irby, The Dartmouth Law J., 9
  11. Goldberg-Ambrose, 1997, Planting Tail Feathers: Tribal Survival and Public Law 280
  12. 10.1086/649030 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/1144204 · DOI
  14. 10.1086/467261 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Buscaglia, 2005, Undermining the Foundations of Organized Crime and Public Sector Corruption, Hoover Essays in Public Policy, 114, 1
  16. 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00300.x · DOI
  17. 10.1257/aer.101.7.3286 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00080-9 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005 · DOI
  20. 10.1257/000282803321946930 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.2139/ssrn.1893693 · DOI
  23. Leonhard, 2012, Returning Washington PL280 Jurisdiction to Its Original Consent-Based Grounds, Gonzaga Law Rev., 47, 663
  24. 10.3886/ICPSR34557 · DOI
  25. Clinton, 1976, Criminal Jurisdiction over Indian Lands: A Journey through a Jurisdictional Maze, Arizona Law Rev., 18
  26. Goldberg, 2006, Is Public Law 280 Fit for the Twenty First Century? Some Data at Last, Connecticut Law Rev., 38, 697
  27. 10.2307/1911408 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/rfs/hhp073 · DOI
  29. 10.2307/2297968 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.2307/3649143 · DOI
  31. Hayek, 1960, The Constitution of Liberty
  32. 10.2307/3649131 · DOI
  33. Herzberg, 1977, The Menominee Indians: From Treaty to Termination, The Wisconsin Magazine of History, 60, 266
  34. Pickering, 2004, A Companion to Anthropology of American Indians
  35. Johnson, 2005, Due Diligence in Business Transactions with Tribal Governments and Enterprises, Nebraska Lawyer, 8
  36. Wooldridge, 2002, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
  37. 10.1093/wbro/13.1.1 · DOI
  38. Jiménez, 1998, Concurrent Tribal and State Jurisdiction under Public Law 280, The American Univ. Law Rev., 47, 1627
  39. 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00573.x · DOI
  40. Richland, 2004, Introduction to Tribal Legal Studies
  41. 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x · DOI
  42. Watson, 1993, Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law
  43. 10.1007/BF02699764 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.jce.2007.03.009 · DOI
  45. Wooldridge, 2009, Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
  46. 10.1007/BF02686330 · DOI
  47. Tabarrok, 2010, Handbook of the Economics of Crime
  48. 10.2307/20068052 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0304-3932(00)00017-9 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Goldberg, 2010, In Theory, in Practice: Judging State Jurisdiction in Indian Country, Univ. of Colorado Law Rev., 81
  51. 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00196-9 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1177/000271625731100107 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1996.tb02641.x · DOI
  55. Newton, 2003, Law and Informal Practices, the Post-Communist Experience
  56. 1937, Fifteenth Census of the United States: 1930. The Indian Population of the United States and Alaska
  57. 10.2202/1555-5879.1402 · DOI
  58. Gross, 1979, Indian Self-Determination and Tribal Sovereignty: An Analysis of Recent Federal Indian Policy, Immigration and Nationality Law Rev., 3, 295
  59. 10.2307/143513 · DOI
  60. 10.1023/A:1020827801137 · DOI
  61. 10.3386/w9198 · DOI
  62. 10.1257/jel.46.2.285 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1017/CBO9780511811241 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1257/aer.91.5.1369 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Pickering, 2001, Making the Case for Culture in Economic Development: A Cross-Section Analysis of Western Tribes, J. of Economic Issues, 25, 45
  66. Canby, 1988, American Indian Law in a Nutshell
  67. Pecos Melton, 1995, Indigenous Justice Systems and Tribal Society, Judicature, 79
  68. 10.1086/590205 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 49

Metadata

Authors
Dimitrova-Grajzl, V., Grajzl, P., & Guse, A. J.
Affiliations
Washington and Lee University (US)
Corresponding author
Grajzl, Peter
Venue
Law & Society Review
Published
2014-03
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
127-160
ISSN
  • 0023-9216 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5893
OpenAlex
W2319503524
Cited by
49
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Law & Society Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
Indian Country, tribal jurisdiction, state jurisdiction, crime, economic development, Indian reservations, income, legal institutions, socioeconomic outcomes, endogenous selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review