The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in home range sizes and population densities of carnivore species along the natural to urban habitat gradient
Abstract
With rapid development and the spread of urbanized land, there is an increasing need to understand species' responses to urban conditions. Carnivores are considered to be sensitive to urbanization; however, there is ample evidence that some carnivore species successfully inhabit urban areas, and human‐modified habitats have recently been recognized as an important refuge for several species. Despite the increasing number of studies on urban carnivore ecology, no comprehensive cross‐species comparisons have been made in order to assess the effects of urbanization on the spatial ecology of carnivores and their population densities. Such a review could provide interesting insight into how some carnivore species respond to increasing urbanization. Specifically, we examine changes in population density and home range size of eight carnivore species that occur along the natural–urban environmental gradient. Using data from 411 articles, we provide evidence that the home range size of carnivores decreases in six out of eight species, and population density increases in three out of six species along the natural–urban habitat gradient. The density‐dependent pattern of variation in home range size is consistent in all species studied. Our results emphasize the remarkable ability of some carnivore species to adapt to novel environments through their behavioural flexibility and life history adaptations. We outline ideas for future research that could be adopted in addressing this phenomenon, namely comparative approaches and detailed studies of biotic and abiotic conditions along natural–urban gradients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system
Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23028 · Cited by 1,721
Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation
Crooks, K. R. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00386.x · Cited by 943
Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?
BERGER, K. M., & GESE, E. M. (2007) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01287.x · Cited by 398
Survival and Cause‐Specific Mortality of Red Foxes in Agricultural and Urban Areas of Illinois
GOSSELINK, T. E., VAN DEELEN, T. R., WARNER, R. E., & MANKIN, P. C. (2007) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/2006-020 · Cited by 123
Farias, V., Fuller, T. K., Wayne, R. K., & Sauvajot, R. M. (2005) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1017/s0952836905006850 · Cited by 74
Cited by
Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes
Campbell, S. J., Ashley, W., Gil-Fernandez, M., Newsome, T. M., Di Giallonardo, F., Ortiz-Baez, A. S., Mahar, J. E., Towerton, A. L., Gillings, M., Holmes, E. C., et al. (2020) · Virus Evolution · doi:10.1093/ve/veaa065 · Cited by 47
Tolhurst, B. A., Baker, R. J., Cagnacci, F., & Scott, D. M. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10071167 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Šálek, M., Drahníková, L., & Tkadlec, E.
- Venue
- Mammal Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-25
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2907
- OpenAlex
- W1501760129
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in home range sizes and population densities of carnivore species along the natural to urban habitat gradient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mam.12027
- The paper
- Šálek, M., Drahníková, L., & Tkadlec, E. (2015). Changes in home range sizes and population densities of carnivore species along the natural to urban habitat gradient. Mammal Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.