Cited by 71Migration, Health and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The “thinking a lot” idiom of distress and PTSD: an examination of their relationship among traumatized Cambodian refugees using the “thinking a lot” questionnaire

Hinton, Devon E., Reis, Ria, de Jong, Joop·2015·Medical Anthropology Quarterly

Abstract

“Thinking a lot” (TAL)—also referred to as “thinking too much”—is a key complaint in many cultural contexts, and the current article profiles this idiom of distress among Cambodian refugees. The article also proposes a general model of how TAL generates various types of distress that then cause PTSD‐type psychopathology, a model we refer to as the TAL–PTSD model. As tested in this Cambodian refugee sample, the model is supported by the following: (1) the close connection of TAL to PTSD as shown by odds ratio (OR = 19.6), correlation (r = .86), and factor loading; and (2) the mediation of most of the effect of TAL on PTSD by TAL‐caused somatic symptoms, catastrophic cognitions, trauma recall, insomnia, and irritability. The questionnaire used in the present study is provided and can be used to examine TAL in other cultural and global contexts to advance the study of this commonly encountered distress form. [idioms of distress, “thinking a lot,” “thinking too much,” Cambodian refugees, PTSD]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/maq.12204

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in primary care settings have suggested that depressive, anxiety, and somatic symptoms may be different presentations of a common latent phenomenon and may require common therapeutic approaches.

    “Studies in primary care settings have indeed suggested that depressive, anxiety, and somatic symptoms may be different presentations of a common latent phenomenon 80 and may require common therapeutic approaches, 81 leading some to propose a higher-order category of 'common mental disorders.' 82”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinton, D. E., Reis, R., & de Jong, J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research University of Amsterdam
Corresponding author
Hinton, Devon E.
Venue
Medical Anthropology Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-14
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
357-380
ISSN
  • 0745-5194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1387
OpenAlex
W2132336649
Cited by
71
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Anthropology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, Cambodian refugees, somatic symptoms, catastrophic cognitions, insomnia, irritability, mediation, refugee mental health
MeSH terms
Cambodia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Refugees, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review