Cited by 1,524Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchHealth and Conflict StudiesMigration, Health and Trauma

War exposure, daily stressors, and mental health in conflict and post-conflict settings: Bridging the divide between trauma-focused and psychosocial frameworks

Miller, Kenneth E., Rasmussen, Andrew·2010·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

This paper seeks to bridge the divisive split between advocates of trauma-focused and psychosocial approaches to understanding and addressing mental health needs in conflict and post-conflict settings by emphasizing the role that daily stressors play in mediating direct war exposure and mental health outcomes. The authors argue that trauma-focused advocates tend to overemphasize the impact of direct war exposure on mental health, and fail to consider the contribution of stressful social and material conditions (daily stressors). Drawing on the findings of recent studies that have examined the relationship of both war exposure and daily stressors to mental health status, a model is proposed in which daily stressors partially mediate the relationship of war exposure to mental health. Based on that model, and on the growing body of research that supports it, an integrative, sequenced approach to intervention is proposed in which daily stressors are first addressed, and specialized interventions are then provided for individuals whose distress does not abate with the repair of the social ecology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.029

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, K. E., & Rasmussen, A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Kenneth E.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
7-16
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984065858
Cited by
1,524
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 195 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 41
FWCI
36.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
war exposure, daily hassles, mental health, conflict settings, post-conflict societies, psychosocial approach, mediation, social ecology, mental health interventions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Health Status, Humans, Life Change Events, Mental Health, Models, Psychological, Social Environment, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Violence, Warfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review