Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SARS‐CoV‐2 and human milk: What is the evidence?

Open access
Lackey, Kimberly A., Pace, Ryan M., Williams, Janet E., Bode, Lars, Donovan, Sharon M., Järvinen, Kirsi M., Seppo, Antti E., Raiten, Daniel J., Meehan, Courtney L., McGuire, Mark A., McGuire, Michelle K.·2020·Maternal & Child Nutrition

Abstract

The novel coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 has emerged as one of the most compelling and concerning public health challenges of our time. To address the myriad issues generated by this pandemic, an interdisciplinary breadth of research, clinical and public health communities has rapidly engaged to collectively find answers and solutions. One area of active inquiry is understanding the mode(s) of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission. Although respiratory droplets are a known mechanism of transmission, other mechanisms are likely. Of particular importance to global health is the possibility of vertical transmission from infected mothers to infants through breastfeeding or consumption of human milk. However, there is limited published literature related to vertical transmission of any human coronaviruses (including SARS‐CoV‐2) via human milk and/or breastfeeding. Results of the literature search reported here (finalized on 17 April 2020) revealed a single study providing some evidence of vertical transmission of human coronavirus 229E; a single study evaluating presence of SARS‐CoV in human milk (it was negative); and no published data on MERS‐CoV and human milk. We identified 13 studies reporting human milk tested for SARS‐CoV‐2; one study (a non‐peer‐reviewed preprint) detected the virus in one milk sample, and another study detected SARS‐CoV‐2 specific IgG in milk. Importantly, none of the studies on coronaviruses and human milk report validation of their collection and analytical methods for use in human milk. These reports are evaluated here, and their implications related to the possibility of vertical transmission of coronaviruses (in particular, SARS‐CoV‐2) during breastfeeding are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mcn.13032

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Lackey, K. A., Pace, R. M., Williams, J. E., Bode, L., Donovan, S. M., Järvinen, K. M., Seppo, A. E., Raiten, D. J., Meehan, C. L., McGuire, M. A., & McGuire, M. K.
Venue
Maternal & Child Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-30
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
e13032-e13032
ISSN
  • 1740-8695 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-8709
OpenAlex
W3030419010
Cited by
160
References
6
FWCI
19.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SARS‐CoV‐2 and human milk: What is the evidence? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mcn.13032
The paper
Lackey, K. A., Pace, R. M., Williams, J. E., Bode, L., Donovan, S. M., Järvinen, K. M., Seppo, A. E., Raiten, D. J., Meehan, C. L., McGuire, M. A., & McGuire, M. K. (2020). SARS‐CoV‐2 and human milk: What is the evidence? Maternal & Child Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.