The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A practical guide to environmental association analysis in landscape genomics
Abstract
Landscape genomics is an emerging research field that aims to identify the environmental factors that shape adaptive genetic variation and the gene variants that drive local adaptation. Its development has been facilitated by next‐generation sequencing, which allows for screening thousands to millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms in many individuals and populations at reasonable costs. In parallel, data sets describing environmental factors have greatly improved and increasingly become publicly accessible. Accordingly, numerous analytical methods for environmental association studies have been developed. Environmental association analysis identifies genetic variants associated with particular environmental factors and has the potential to uncover adaptive patterns that are not discovered by traditional tests for the detection of outlier loci based on population genetic differentiation. We review methods for conducting environmental association analysis including categorical tests, logistic regressions, matrix correlations, general linear models and mixed effects models. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches, provide a list of dedicated software packages and their specific properties, and stress the importance of incorporating neutral genetic structure in the analysis. We also touch on additional important aspects such as sampling design, environmental data preparation, pooled and reduced‐representation sequencing, candidate‐gene approaches, linearity of allele–environment associations and the combination of environmental association analyses with traditional outlier detection tests. We conclude by summarizing expected future directions in the field, such as the extension of statistical approaches, environmental association analysis for ecological gene annotation, and the need for replication and post hoc validation studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Population Structure and Eigenanalysis
Patterson, N., Price, A. L., & Reich, D. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190 · Cited by 5,280
Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.
WEST, S. A., GRIFFIN, A. S., & GARDNER, A. (2007) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x · Cited by 1,889
SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation
Morin, P. A., Luikart, G., Wayne, R. K., & the SNP workshop group (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009 · Cited by 1,080
Kofler, R., Pandey, R. V., & Schlötterer, C. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr589 · Cited by 815
Stinchcombe, J. R., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2008) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800937 · Cited by 622
A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation
Berg, J. J., & Coop, G. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004412 · Cited by 487
Adaptation–not by sweeps alone
Pritchard, J. K., & Di Rienzo, A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2880 · Cited by 445
Cited by
Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions
Hoban, S., Kelley, J. L., Lotterhos, K. E., Antolin, M. F., Bradburd, G., Lowry, D. B., Poss, M. L., Reed, L. K., Storfer, A., & Whitlock, M. C. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/688018 · Cited by 876
“…adaptation (Kawecki 2008; Schoville et al. 2012; Savolainen et al. 2013; Tif fi n and Ross-Ibarra 2014), genetic-environment association methods (Rellstab et al. 2015), genomic resource development (Stapley et al. 2010; Ellegren 2014; Bragg et al. 2015; Manel et al. 2016), signatures of…”
Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management
Hohenlohe, P. A., Funk, W. C., & Rajora, O. P. (2021) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15720 · Cited by 702
LFMM 2: Fast and Accurate Inference of Gene-Environment Associations in Genome-Wide Studies
Caye, K., Jumentier, B., Lepeule, J., & François, O. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz008 · Cited by 404
Common garden experiments in the genomic era: new perspectives and opportunities
de Villemereuil, P., Gaggiotti, O. E., Mouterde, M., & Till-Bottraud, I. (2016) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2015.93 · Cited by 384
Evolutionary genomics can improve prediction of species’ responses to climate change
Waldvogel, A.-M., Feldmeyer, B., Rolshausen, G., Exposito-Alonso, M., Rellstab, C., Kofler, R., Mock, T., Schmid, K., Schmitt, I., Bataillon, T., et al. (2020) · Evolution Letters · doi:10.1002/evl3.154 · Cited by 348
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rellstab, C., Gugerli, F., Eckert, A. J., Hancock, A. M., & Holderegger, R.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-26
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 4348-4370
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2131600024
- Cited by
- 824
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 32.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A practical guide to environmental association analysis in landscape genomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.13322
- The paper
- Rellstab, C., Gugerli, F., Eckert, A. J., Hancock, A. M., & Holderegger, R. (2015). A practical guide to environmental association analysis in landscape genomics. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.