Cited by 76

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ancient DNA reveals differences in behaviour and sociality between brown bears and extinct cave bears

Fortes, Gloria G., Grandal‐d'Anglade, Aurora, Kolbe, Ben, Fernandes, Daniel, Meleg, Ioana N., García‐Vázquez, Ana, Pinto‐Llona, Ana C., Constantin, Silviu, de Torres, Trino J., Ortiz, Jose E., Frischauf, Christine, Rabeder, Gernot, Hofreiter, Michael, Barlow, Axel·2016·Molecular Ecology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Ancient DNA studies have revolutionized the study of extinct species and populations, providing insights on phylogeny, phylogeography, admixture and demographic history. However, inferences on behaviour and sociality have been far less frequent. Here, we investigate the complete mitochondrial genomes of extinct Late Pleistocene cave bears and middle Holocene brown bears that each inhabited multiple geographically proximate caves in northern Spain. In cave bears, we find that, although most caves were occupied simultaneously, each cave almost exclusively contains a unique lineage of closely related haplotypes. This remarkable pattern suggests extreme fidelity to their birth site in cave bears, best described as homing behaviour, and that cave bears formed stable maternal social groups at least for hibernation. In contrast, brown bears do not show any strong association of mitochondrial lineage and cave, suggesting that these two closely related species differed in aspects of their behaviour and sociality. This difference is likely to have contributed to cave bear extinction, which occurred at a time in which competition for caves between bears and humans was likely intense and the ability to rapidly colonize new hibernation sites would have been crucial for the survival of a species so dependent on caves for hibernation as cave bears. Our study demonstrates the potential of ancient DNA to uncover patterns of behaviour and sociality in ancient species and populations, even those that went extinct many tens of thousands of years ago.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mec.13800

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1038/hdy.2015.48 · DOI
  2. Beeman LE, 1976, Homing of black bears in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Bears: Their Biology and Management, 3, 87
  3. 10.1126/science.1245049 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1073/pnas.0806143105 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.033 · DOI
  6. Clark JD, 2002, Bear reintroductions: lessons and challenges, Ursus, 13, 335
  7. 10.1093/molbev/mss075 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2990-0_13 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00064-5 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/molbev/mst077 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nprot.2009.68 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.035 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.026 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/bies.201400160 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.0914096107 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04088.x · DOI
  18. Koby FE, 1953, Modifications que les ours des cavernes ont fait subir à leur habitat, Ier Congrès international de Spéléologie, Paris, t. IV, 4, 15
  19. Kurtén B, 1968, Pleistocene Mammals of Europe
  20. 10.1093/molbev/mss020 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1101/gr.107524.110 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1101/pdb.prot5448 · DOI
  26. MillerMA PfeifferW SchwartzT(2010)Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In:Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) pp.1–8. New Orleans LA. · DOI
  27. 10.1093/bib/bbs012 · DOI
  28. 10.1371/journal.pone.0132005 · DOI
  29. Münzel SC, 2004, Cave bear hunting in the Hohle Fels, a cave site in the Ach Valley, Swabian Jura, Revue de Paleobiologie, 23, 877
  30. Naves J, 1993, El Oso Pardo (Ursus arctos) en España, 147
  31. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004016 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1502-3885.2008.00071.x · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.meegid.2007.08.001 · DOI
  34. Pérez‐Rama M, 2011, Effects of hibernation on the stable isotope signatures of adult and neonate cave bears, Quaternaire Hors série, 4, 79
  35. 10.1007/s11160-013-9339-1 · DOI
  36. Philippe M, 2003, La faune de la grotte Chauvet (Vallon‐Pont‐d'Arc, Ardèche): présentation préliminaire paléontologique et taphonomique, Paleo, 15, 123, 10.4000/paleo.1265 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1073/pnas.0711063105 · DOI
  39. Rogers LL, 1986, Homing by radio‐collared Black Bears, Ursus americanus, in Minnesota, Canadian Field‐Naturalist, 100, 350, 10.5962/p.355647 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02824.x · DOI
  41. 10.1093/molbev/msq262 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/genetics/123.3.603 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1093/molbev/msq083 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.09.023 · DOI
  46. Torres T, 2002, The dating of fossil bear Spanish sites through amino acid racemization: accomplishments and pending treats, Atti Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Trieste, 49, 107
  47. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024510 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.10.017 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Ancient DNA analysis

    Orlando, L., Allaby, R., Skoglund, P., Der Sarkissian, C., Stockhammer, P. W., Ávila-Arcos, M. C., Fu, Q., Krause, J., Willerslev, E., Stone, A. C., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-020-00011-0 · Cited by 411

See all 76

Metadata

Authors
Fortes, G. G., Grandal‐d'Anglade, A., Kolbe, B., Fernandes, D., Meleg, I. N., García‐Vázquez, A., Pinto‐Llona, A. C., Constantin, S., de Torres, T. J., Ortiz, J. E., Frischauf, C., Rabeder, G., Hofreiter, M., & Barlow, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Biochemistry and Biology University of Potsdam 14476 Potsdam OT Golm Germany
  • Instituto Universitario de Xeoloxía Universidade da Coruña 15081 A Coruña Spain
  • School of Archaeology and Earth Institute University College Dublin Dublin 4 Ireland
  • “Emil Racoviță” Institute of Speleology 050711 Bucharest Romania
  • c/o J. Villarías Instituto de Historia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas 28037 Madrid Spain
  • Depto. de Ingeniería Geológica y Minera Universidad Politécnica de Madrid 28003 Madrid Spain
  • Institute of Palaeontology University of Vienna A‐1090 Vienna Austria
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-06
Volume
25
Issue
19
Pages
4907-4918
ISSN
  • 0962-1083
  • 1365-294X
Cited by
76
References
4
Language
en
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO CGL2014‐57209‐P, MINECO CGL2014-57209-P)
  • European Science Foundation (ConGenOmics, Ref. 5882)
  • European Research Council (310763)
  • Xunta de Galicia, Conselleria de Economia e Industria (10 PXIB 162 125 PR)
  • CNCS-UEFISCDI (PCCE_ID_31/2010)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review