CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships

Bates, Joanna, Konkin, Jill, Suddards, Carol, Dobson, Sarah, Pratt, Dan·2013·Medical Education
DOI 10.1111/medu.12087
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives This study was conducted to elucidate how the learning environment and the student–preceptor relationship influence student experiences of being assessed and receiving feedback on performance. Thus, we examined how long‐term clinical clerkship placements influence students’ experiences of and views about assessment and feedback. Methods We took a constructivist grounded approach, using authentic assessment and communities of practice as sensitising concepts. We recruited and interviewed 13 students studying in longitudinal integrated clerkships across two medical schools and six settings, using a semi‐structured interview framework. We used an iterative coding process to code the data and arrive at a coding framework and themes. Results Students valued the unstructured assessment and informal feedback that arose from clinical supervision, and the sense of progress derived from their increasing responsibility for patients and acceptance into the health care community. Three themes emerged from the data. Firstly, students characterised their assessment and feedback as integrated, developmental and longitudinal. They reported authenticity in the monitoring and feedback that arose from the day‐to‐day delivery of patient care with their preceptors. Secondly, students described supportive and caring relationships and a sense of safety. These enabled them to reflect on their strengths and weaknesses and to interpret critical feedback as supportive. Students developed similar relationships across the health care team. Thirdly, the long‐term placement provided for multiple indicators of progress for students. Patient outcomes were perceived as representing direct feedback about students’ development as doctors. Taking increasing responsibility for patients over time is an indicator to students of their increasing competence and contributes to the developing of a doctor identity. Conclusions Clerkship students studying for extended periods in one environment with one preceptor perceive assessment and feedback as authentic because they are embedded in daily patient care, useful because they are developmental and longitudinal, and constructive because they occur in the context of a supportive learning environment and relationship.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/medu.12087

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Boud D, 2010, Student Assessment for Learning In and After Courses, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–144 of 144

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bates, J., Konkin, J., Suddards, C., Dobson, S., & Pratt, D.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Bates, Joanna
ORCID
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-12
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
362-374
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
DOI
10.1111/medu.12087
OpenAlex
W1823953396
Cited by
145
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
longitudinal integrated clerkship, clinical evaluation, clinical feedback, student perceptions, authentic assessment, communities of practice, clinical supervision, student responsibility, learning environment, medical students
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Clerkship, Educational Measurement, Feedback, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Preceptorship, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review