Cited by 72Innovations in Medical EducationDiverse Music Education InsightsHealth and Medical Education

Music lessons: revealing medicine's learning culture through a comparison with that of music

Open access
Watling, Christopher, Driessen, Erik, van der Vleuten, Cees P M, Vanstone, Meredith, Lingard, Lorelei·2013·Medical Education

Abstract

Context: Research on medical learning has tended to focus on the individual learner, but a sufficient understanding of the learning process requires that attention also be paid to the essential influence of the cultural context within which learning takes place. In this study, we undertook a comparative examination of two learning cultures – those of music and medicine – in order to unearth assumptions about learning that are taken for granted within the medical culture. Methods: We used a constructivist grounded theory approach to explore experiences of learning within the two cultures. We conducted nine focus groups (two with medical students, three with residents, four with music students) and four individual interviews (with one clinician‐educator, one music educator and two doctor‐musicians), for a total of 37 participants. Analysis occurred alongside and informed data collection. Themes were identified iteratively using constant comparisons. Results: Cultural perspectives diverged in terms of where learning should occur, what learning outcomes are desired, and how learning is best facilitated. Whereas medicine valued learning by doing , music valued learning by lesson . Whereas medical learners aimed for competence, music students aimed instead for ever‐better performance. Whereas medical learners valued their teachers for their clinical skills more than for their teaching abilities, the opposite was true in music, in which teachers' instructional skills were paramount. Self‐assessment challenged learners in both cultures, but medical learners viewed self‐assessment as a skill they could develop, whereas music students recognised that external feedback would always be required. Conclusions: This comparative analysis reveals that medicine and music make culturally distinct assumptions about teaching and learning. The contrasts between the two cultures illuminate potential vulnerabilities in the medical learning culture, including the risks inherent in its competence‐focused approach and the constraints it places on its own teachers. By highlighting these vulnerabilities, we provide a stimulus for reimagining and renewing medicine's educational practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/medu.12235

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Critical feedback is exchanged more readily when it is normalized by a learning culture in the training of athletes and musicians.

    “It has also been found in the training of athletes and musicians that critical feedback is exchanged more readily when it is normalized by a learning culture [38, 84].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Vanstone, M., & Lingard, L.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Department of Education Development and Research Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Watling, Christopher
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-10
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
842-850
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2030429140
Cited by
72
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
music education, hands-on learning, competence versus performance, self-assessment, feedback, teacher instructional skills, medical students, music students, medical education reform
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Learning, Music, Self-Assessment, Students, Medical, Teaching, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review