Cited by 5Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackEmpathy and Medical Education

Sharing is caring: Dealing with feedback and difficult feelings.

van der Leeuw, Renée M·2014·Medical Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/medu.12545

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Leeuw, R. M.
Affiliations
Amsterdam the Netherlands
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-12
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
1034-1036
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2130315841
Cited by
5
References
10
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
feedback, difficult emotions, emotion regulation, physician-patient communication
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Guilt, Humans, Shame

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review