The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning for data anomaly detection and data compression of a long‐span suspension bridge
Open accessAbstract
As intelligent sensing and sensor network systems have made progress and low‐cost online structural health monitoring has become possible and widely implemented, large quantities of highly heterogeneous data can be acquired during the monitoring. This has resulted in exceeding the capacity of traditional data analytics techniques, especially in monitoring large‐scale or critical civil structures. In particular, data storage has become a big challenge, hence, resulting in the emergence of data compression and reconstruction as a new area in structural health monitoring (SHM) of large infrastructure systems. SHM data generally include anomalies that can disturb structural analysis and assessment. The fundamental reasons for the abnormality of data are extremely complex. Therefore, reconstruction of the abnormal data is generally difficult and poses serious challenges to achieve high‐accuracy after data has been compressed. Considering these significant challenges, in this paper, a novel deep‐learning‐enabled data compression and reconstruction framework is proposed that can be divided into two phases: (a) a one‐dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that extracts features directly from the input signals is designed to detect abnormal data with validated high accuracy; (b) a new SHM data compression and reconstruction method based on Autoencoder structure is further developed, which can recover the data with high‐accuracy under such a low compression ratio. To validate the proposed approach, acceleration data from the SHM system of a long‐span bridge in China are employed. In the abnormal data detection phase, the results show that the proposed method can detect anomaly with high accuracy. Subsequently, smaller reconstruction errors can be achieved even by using only 10% compression ratio for the normal data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Deconvolution Network for Semantic Segmentation
Noh, H., Hong, S., & Han, B. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.178 · Cited by 4,422
Deep Learning‐Based Crack Damage Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Cha, Y., Choi, W., & Büyüköztürk, O. (2017) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12263 · Cited by 3,295
What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?
Jarrett, K., Kavukcuoglu, K., Ranzato, M. A., & LeCun, Y. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459469 · Cited by 2,153
Sparse Bayesian Learning for Basis Selection
Wipf, D. P., & Rao, B. D. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.831016 · Cited by 1,559
Structural Damage Detection with Automatic Feature‐Extraction through Deep Learning
Lin, Y., Nie, Z., & Ma, H. (2017) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12313 · Cited by 634
A New Neural Dynamic Classification Algorithm
Rafiei, M. H., & Adeli, H. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2682102 · Cited by 501
Tang, Z., Chen, Z., Bao, Y., & Li, H. (2019) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.2296 · Cited by 436
Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning
Pathirage, C. S. N., Li, J., Li, L., Hao, H., Liu, W., & Ni, P. (2018) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109 · Cited by 415
Rafiei, M. H., & Adeli, H. (2018) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.070 · Cited by 401
Pixel-level crack delineation in images with convolutional feature fusion
Ni, F., Zhang, J., & Chen, Z. (2019) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.2286 · Cited by 220
Self-citation
Cited by
Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., & Girolami, M. (2022) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217211036880 · Cited by 607
Hassani, S., & Dackermann, U. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23042204 · Cited by 492
A systematic review of convolutional neural network-based structural condition assessment techniques
Sony, S., Dunphy, K., Sadhu, A., & Capretz, M. (2021) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111347 · Cited by 398
Lei, X., Sun, L., & Xia, Y. (2021) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921720959226 · Cited by 236
Jia, J., & Li, Y. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23218824 · Cited by 182
“Ni et al. [129] used the data from the SHM system of a long-span bridge in China.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Ni, F., Zhang, J., & Noori, M. N.
- Venue
- Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12-27
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 685-700
- ISSN
- 1093-9687 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8667
- OpenAlex
- W2996834926
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 20.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning for data anomaly detection and data compression of a long‐span suspension bridge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mice.12528
- The paper
- Ni, F., Zhang, J., & Noori, M. N. (2020). Deep learning for data anomaly detection and data compression of a long‐span suspension bridge. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12528
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.