The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Silicon‐mediated resistance of Arabidopsis against powdery mildew involves mechanisms other than the salicylic acid ( SA )‐dependent defence pathway
Open accessAbstract
Summary: On absorption by plants, silicon ( S i) offers protection against many fungal pathogens, including powdery mildews. The mechanisms by which S i exerts its prophylactic role remain enigmatic, although a prevailing hypothesis suggests that S i positively influences priming. Attempts to decipher S i properties have been limited to plants able to absorb S i, which excludes the model plant A rabidopsis because it lacks S i influx transporters. In this work, we were able to engineer A rabidopsis plants with an S i transporter from wheat ( TaLsi1 ) and to exploit mutants ( pad4 and sid2 ) deficient in salicylic acid ( SA )‐dependent defence responses to study their phenotypic response and changes in defence expression against G olovinomyces cichoracearum ( G c ) following S i treatment. Our results showed that TaLsi1 plants contained significantly more S i and were significantly more resistant to G c infection than control plants when treated with S i, the first such demonstration in a plant transformed with a heterologous S i transporter. The resistant plants accumulated higher levels of SA and expressed higher levels of transcripts encoding defence genes, thus suggesting a role for S i in the process. However, TaLsi1 pad4 and TaLsi1 sid2 plants were also more resistant to G c than were pad4 and sid2 plants following S i treatment. Analysis of the resistant phenotypes revealed a significantly reduced production of SA and expression of defence genes comparable with susceptible controls. These results indicate that S i contributes to Arabidopsis defence priming following pathogen infection, but highlight that S i will confer protection even when priming is altered. We conclude that S i‐mediated protection involves mechanisms other than SA ‐dependent defence responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Cited by
Tubana, B. S., Babu, T., & Datnoff, L. E. (2016) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/ss.0000000000000179 · Cited by 392
Metadata
- Authors
- Vivancos, J., Labbé, C., Menzies, J. G., & Bélanger, R. R.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 572-582
- ISSN
- 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-6722
- OpenAlex
- W1489083847
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Silicon‐mediated resistance of Arabidopsis against powdery mildew involves mechanisms other than the salicylic acid ( SA )‐dependent defence pathway. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mpp.12213
- The paper
- Vivancos, J., Labbé, C., Menzies, J. G., & Bélanger, R. R. (2015). Silicon‐mediated resistance of Arabidopsis against powdery mildew involves mechanisms other than the salicylic acid ( SA )‐dependent defence pathway. Molecular Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.