Cited by 83Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesOcular Infections and Treatments

Treatment and outcomes of invasive fusariosis: review of 65 cases from the PATH Alliance® registry

Open access
Horn, David L., Freifeld, Alison G., Schuster, Mindy G., Azie, Nkechi E., Franks, Billy, Kauffman, Carol A.·2014·Mycoses

Abstract

Summary: Invasive Fusarium infections occur in immunosuppressed patients, especially those with haematological malignancies. We conducted a descriptive analysis of data from patients with invasive fusariosis identified in the Prospective Antifungal Therapy Alliance registry, which collected data on invasive fungal infections in the United States and Canada from 2004 to 2008. In this series of 65 patients with proven (83.1%) and probable (16.9%) invasive fusariosis, the most common underlying condition was haematological malignancy, in which neutropenia and corticosteroid usage frequently occurred. Seven patients with invasive Fusarium infections had cross‐reactive galactomannan assay results. The survival rate for all patients at 90 days was 44%, which was an improvement compared with historical data. Disseminated disease occurred frequently (35.4%), and patients with and without disseminated disease had survival rates of 33% and 50%, respectively. Posaconazole and voriconazole were the most frequently employed therapies and may be linked to the improved survival rate observed in this patient series. In summary, patients with invasive Fusarium infections continue to have high fatality rates, especially those with disseminated disease. Fusarium infections should be strongly considered in the absence of Aspergillus isolation in patients at high risk of mould infections with positive galactomannan assay test results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/myc.12212

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among 65 cases of invasive fusariosis in the US and Canada, 78.5% were white, 9.2% Asian, 6.2% black, and 4.6% Hispanic ethnicity.

    “Among 65 cases of invasive fusariosis in the US and Canada, 78.5% were white, 9.2% Asian, 6.2% black, and 4.6% Hispanic ethnicity [107].”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [107]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Muhammed M, Anagnostou T, Desalermos A et al. Fusarium infec- tion: report of 26 cases and review of 97 cases from the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2013; 92: 305-16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horn, D. L., Freifeld, A. G., Schuster, M. G., Azie, N. E., Franks, B., & Kauffman, C. A.
Affiliations
  • David Horn LLC Doylestown PA USA
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Astellas Pharma (United States) (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Horn, David L.
Venue
Mycoses
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-18
Volume
57
Issue
11
Pages
652-658
ISSN
  • 0027-5557 (ISSN-L)
  • 0933-7407
  • 1439-0507
OpenAlex
W1967749841
Cited by
83
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mycoses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • Emory University
  • University of Minnesota
  • School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University
  • University of Washington
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • City of Hope
  • Astellas Pharma
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
invasive fusariosis, Fusarium, hematologic malignancies, immunosuppression, neutropenia, corticosteroid use, disseminated disease, survival, posaconazole, voriconazole, galactomannan assay, antifungal therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antifungal Agents, Canada, Female, Fusarium, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Registries, Triazoles, United States, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Fusariosis, Voriconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review