The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology – nutritional epidemiology (STROBE‐nut): An extension of the STROBE statement
Open accessAbstract
Concerns have been raised about the quality of reporting in nutritional epidemiology. Research reporting guidelines such as the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement can improve quality of reporting in observational studies. Herein, we propose recommendations for reporting nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research by extending the STROBE statement into Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology – Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE‐nut). Recommendations for the reporting of nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research were developed following a systematic and consultative process, co‐ordinated by a multidisciplinary group of 21 experts. Consensus on reporting guidelines was reached through a three‐round Delphi consultation process with 53 external experts. In total, 24 recommendations for nutritional epidemiology were added to the STROBE checklist. When used appropriately, reporting guidelines for nutritional epidemiology can contribute to improve reporting of observational studies with a focus on diet and health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 · Cited by 8,613 · cited 1×
“The need to ensure clear, transparent and useful reports in health research led to important reporting initiatives such as the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement (Vandenbroucke et al. 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWillett, W. C. (1998) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195122978.001.0001 · Cited by 4,541
Vandenbroucke, J. P., Elm, E. V., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., & initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1 · Cited by 3,543
Self-citationChowdhury, R., Warnakula, S., Kunutsor, S., Crowe, F., Ward, H. A., Johnson, L., Franco, O. H., Butterworth, A. S., Forouhi, N. G., Thompson, S. G., et al. (2014) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m13-1788 · Cited by 1,139
Sinha, I. P., Smyth, R. L., & Williamson, P. R. (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393 · Cited by 891
Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors
Simera, I., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Hoey, J. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050139 · Cited by 220 · cited 1×
“The final sample of experts that provided input, however, was adequate and still higher than most reporting guidelines that used faceto-face meetings or workshops (Simera et al. 2008).”
Result
Cited by
Dietary Assessment Toolkits: An Overview
Dao, M. C., Subar, A. F., Warthon-Medina, M., Cade, J. E., Burrows, T., Golley, R. K., Forouhi, N. G., Pearce, M., & Holmes, B. A. (2019) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980018002951 · Cited by 176
Self-citationPestoni, G., Krieger, J.-P., Sych, J. M., Faeh, D., & Rohrmann, S. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11010126 · Cited by 73
Optimal Design of Clinical Trials of Dietary Interventions in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction
Staudacher, H. M., Yao, C. K., Chey, W. D., & Whelan, K. (2022) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001732 · Cited by 52
“These recommendations were developed based on the experience of the authors and consulting the CONSORT 2010 guidelines for reporting randomized trials (60), the extended statement for nonpharmacologic treatments (39), the STROBE-nut extension for reporting nutritional epidemiology (61), the International Life Sciences…”
Alruwaili, A., King, J. A., Deighton, K., Kelly, B. M., Liao, Z., Innes, A., Henson, J., Yates, T., Johnson, W., Thivel, D., et al. (2024) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16584 · Cited by 24
Amaral, M. A., Mundstock, E., Scarpatto, C. H., Cañon-Montañez, W., & Mattiello, R. (2022) · Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100078 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Lachat, C., Hawwash, D., Ocké, M. C., Berg, C., Forsum, E., Hörnell, A., Larsson, C. L., Sonestedt, E., Wirfält, E., Åkesson, A., Kolsteren, P., Byrnes, G., De Keyzer, W., Van Camp, J., Cade, J. E., Slimani, N., Cevallos, M., Egger, M., & Huybrechts, I.
- Venue
- Nutrition Bulletin
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-08-14
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 240-251
- ISSN
- 1467-3010 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9827
- OpenAlex
- W2508371170
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology – nutritional epidemiology (STROBE‐nut): An extension of the STROBE statement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nbu.12217
- The paper
- Lachat, C., Hawwash, D., Ocké, M. C., Berg, C., Forsum, E., Hörnell, A., Larsson, C. L., Sonestedt, E., Wirfält, E., Åkesson, A., Kolsteren, P., Byrnes, G., De Keyzer, W., Van Camp, J., Cade, J. E., Slimani, N., Cevallos, M., Egger, M., & Huybrechts, I. (2016). Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology – nutritional epidemiology (STROBE‐nut): An extension of the STROBE statement. Nutrition Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
