Cited by 26Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Assessing the colonic microbiome, hydrogenogenic and hydrogenotrophic genes, transit and breath methane in constipation

Open access
Wolf, P. G., Parthasarathy, G., Chen, J., O'Connor, H. M., Chia, N., Bharucha, A. E., Gaskins, H. R.·2017·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Background: Differences in the gut microbiota and breath methane production have been observed in chronic constipation, but the relationship between colonic microbiota, transit, and breath tests remains unclear. Methods: In 25 healthy and 25 constipated females we evaluated the sigmoid colonic mucosal and fecal microbiota using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, abundance of hydrogenogenic FeFe (FeFe‐hydA) and hydrogenotrophic (methyl coenzyme M reductase A [mrcA] and dissimilatory sulfite reductase A [dsrA]) genes with real‐time qPCR assays, breath hydrogen and methane levels after oral lactulose, and colonic transit with scintigraphy. Key Results: Breath hydrogen and methane were not correlated with constipation, slow colon transit, or with abundance of corresponding genes. After adjusting for colonic transit, the abundance of FeFehydA, dsrA, and mcrA were greater (P<.005) in colonic mucosa, but not stool, of constipated patients. The abundance of the selected functional gene targets also correlated with that of selected taxa. The colonic mucosal abundance of FeFe‐hydA, but not mcrA, correlated positively (P<.05) with breath methane production, slow colonic transit, and overall microbiome composition. In the colonic mucosa and feces, the abundance of hydrogenogenic and hydrogenotrophic genes were positively correlated (P<.05). Breath methane production was not associated with constipation or colonic transit. Conclusions & Inferences: Corroborating our earlier findings with 16S rRNA genes, colonic mucosal but not fecal hydrogenogenic and hydrogenotrophic genes were more abundant in constipated vs. healthy subjects independent of colonic transit. Breath gases do not directly reflect the abundance of target genes contributing to their production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.13056

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In women with and without constipation, qPCR of colonic mucosa found more hydrogen-producing and hydrogen-using genes in the constipated group.

    “Analysis of functional gene targets in constipated and healthy females also has demonstrated increased abundance of hydrogenogenic (hydrogen producing) and hydrogenotrophic (hydrogen utilizing) genes by qPCR in colonic mucosa of constipated individuals163.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD. Mass spectrometry-based me- tabolomics. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2007;26:51-78.
  2. Levitt MD, Hirsh P, Fetzer CA, Sheahan M, Levine AS. H 2 excre- tion after ingestion of complex carbohydrates. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:383-389.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolf, P. G., Parthasarathy, G., Chen, J., O'Connor, H. M., Chia, N., Bharucha, A. E., & Gaskins, H. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Clinical Research and Trials Unit Center for Clinical and Translational Science Rochester MN USA
Corresponding author
Bharucha, A. E.
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-13
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2982
OpenAlex
W2614718459
Cited by
26
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 DK78924)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR000135)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
chronic constipation, colonic microbiota, breath methane, breath hydrogen, colonic transit, mcrA, DsrA, colonic mucosa, fecal microbiota, lactulose breath test, gut microbiota
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adult, Breath Tests, Constipation, DNA, Bacterial, Female, Gastrointestinal Transit, Humans, Methane, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review