Cited by 35Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementVoice and Speech DisordersArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Identification of swallowing disorders in early and mid-stage Parkinson’s disease using pattern recognition of pharyngeal high-resolution manometry data

Open access
Jones, C. A., Hoffman, M. R., Lin, L., Abdelhalim, S., Jiang, J. J., McCulloch, T. M.·2018·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) can cause severe dysphagia, especially later in disease progression. Early identification of swallowing dysfunction may lead to earlier intervention. Pharyngeal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) provides complementary information to videofluoroscopy, with advantages of being quantitative and objective. Artificial neural network (ANN) classification can examine non‐linear relationships among multiple variables with relatively low bias. We evaluated if ANN techniques could differentiate between patients with PD and healthy controls. Methods: Simultaneous videofluoroscopy and pharyngeal HRM were performed on 31 patients with early to mid‐stage PD and 31 age‐ and sex‐matched controls during thin‐liquid swallows of 2 cc, 10 cc and comfortable sip volume. We performed multilayer‐perceptron analyses on only videofluoroscopic data, only HRM data or a combination of the two. We also evaluated variability‐based parameters, representing variability in manometric parameters across multiple swallows. We hypothesized that patients with PD and controls would be classified with at least 80% accuracy, and that combined videofluoroscopic and HRM data would classify participants better than either alone. Key Results: Classification rates were highest with all parameters considered. Maximum classification rate was 82.3 ± 5.2%, recorded for 2 cc swallows. Inclusion of variability‐based parameters improved classification rates. Classification rates using only manometric parameters were similar to those using all parameters, and rates were substantially lower for the comfortable sip volumes. Conclusions & Inferences: Results from these classifications highlight the differences between swallowing function in patients with early and mid‐stage PD and healthy controls. Early identification of swallowing dysfunction is key to developing preventative swallowing treatments for those with PD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.13236

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VFSS with high-resolution manometry has been considered in the evaluation of pharyngeal and esophageal anatomical structures.

    “VFSS, along with high-resolution manometry, has also been considered in the evaluation of pharyngeal and esophageal anatomical structures(27,29-31)”

    From Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of dysphagia: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction describes high-resolution manometry as complementary to videofluoroscopy, and Materials and Methods (Data collection) reports collecting both simultaneously. The analyses evaluate swallowing physiology in pharyngeal regions and the upper esophageal sphincter, but do not establish evaluation of esophageal anatomical structures more broadly. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]Butler SG Stuart A Castell DRG Koch K Kemp S Effects of age, gender, bolus volume, condition, viscosity, and volume on pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter pressure and temporal measurements during swallowing Dysphagia 2007 22 4 367 367 19064903

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, C. A., Hoffman, M. R., Lin, L., Abdelhalim, S., Jiang, J. J., & McCulloch, T. M.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
McCulloch, T. M.
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-16
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
e13236-e13236
ISSN
  • 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2982
OpenAlex
W2769998482
Cited by
35
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R33 DC011130A)
  • Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, dysphagia, artificial neural network classification, multilayer perceptron, videofluoroscopy, early diagnosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Deglutition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Manometry, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Sensitivity and Specificity, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review