Cited by 12Ion Channels and ReceptorsGastrointestinal motility and disordersPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Effects of ginger constituent 6-shogaol on gastroesophageal vagal afferent C-fibers

Open access
Huang, Yongming, Patil, Mayur J., Yu, Mingwei, Liptak, Peter, Undem, Bradley J., Dong, Xinzhong, Wang, Guobin, Yu, Shaoyong·2019·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Background: Ginger has been used as an herbal medicine worldwide to relieve nausea/vomiting and gastrointestinal discomfort, but the cellular and molecular mechanisms of its neuronal action remain unclear. The present study aimed to determine the effects of ginger constituent 6‐shogaol on gastroesophageal vagal nodose C‐fibers. Methods: Extracellular single‐unit recording and two‐photon nodose neuron imaging were performed, respectively, in ex vivo gastroesophageal‐vagal preparations from wild type and Pirt‐GCaMP6 transgenic mice. The action potential discharge or calcium influx evoked by mechanical distension and chemical perfusions applied to the gastroesophageal vagal afferent nerve endings were recorded, respectively, at their intact neuronal cell soma in vagal nodose ganglia. The effects of 6‐shogaol on nodose C‐fiber neurons were then compared and determined. Key Results: Gastroesophageal application of 6‐shogaol‐elicited intensive calcium influxes in nodose neurons and evoked robust action potential discharges in most studied nodose C‐fibers. Such activation effects were followed by a desensitized response to the second application of 6‐shogaol. However, action potential discharges evoked by esophageal mechanical distension, after 6‐shogaol perfusion, did not significantly change. Pretreatment with TRPA1 selective blocker HC‐030031 inhibited 6‐shogaol‐induced action potential discharges in gastric and esophageal nodose C‐fiber neurons, suggesting that TRPA1 played a role in mediating 6‐shogaol‐induced activation response. Conclusion and Inferences: This study provides evidence that ginger constituent 6‐shogaol directly activates vagal afferent C‐fiber peripheral gastrointestinal endings. This activation leads to desensitization to subsequent application of 6‐shogaol but not subsequent esophageal mechanical distension. Further investigation is required to establish a possible contribution in its anti‐emetic effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.13585

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials (n = 1174) found that ginger significantly improves overall pregnancy-associated nausea and vomiting.

    “A meta-analysis of 13 randomized control trials (n = 1174) found that ginger significantly improves overall pregnancy-associated nausea and vomiting, comparable to vitamin B6 [230] and as effective as standard antiemetics like dimenhydrinate [231].”
  • Ginger is comparable to vitamin B6 for pregnancy-associated nausea and vomiting.

    “A meta-analysis of 13 randomized control trials (n = 1174) found that ginger significantly improves overall pregnancy-associated nausea and vomiting, comparable to vitamin B6 [230] and as effective as standard antiemetics like dimenhydrinate [231].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, Y., Patil, M. J., Yu, M., Liptak, P., Undem, B. J., Dong, X., Wang, G., & Yu, S.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin Comenius University in Bratislava Martin Slovakia
  • Wuhan Union Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Yu, Shaoyong
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-04
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
e13585-e13585
ISSN
  • 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2982
OpenAlex
W2934700758
Cited by
12
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DK110366)
  • Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
6-shogaol, ginger, nodose ganglion, TRPA1, nausea and vomiting, desensitization, calcium influx, esophageal distension
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Catechols, Esophagus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Afferent, Nodose Ganglion, Stomach, Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review