Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and beverage‐related risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease: An original study in Chinese college freshmen, a systemic review and meta‐analysis

Chen, Youli, Chen, Can, Ouyang, Zhen, Duan, Chaofan, Liu, Jinsong, Hou, Xiaohua, Bai, Tao·2022·Neurogastroenterology & Motility
DOI 10.1111/nmo.14266
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Beverage‐drinking behavior could be a potential risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in young populations. However, GERD prevalence in this population has not been investigated, and beverage consumption's association with GERD remains inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and beverage‐related risk factors of GERD among Chinese college freshmen and in youth around the world. Methods: A cross‐sectional survey was conducted in Chinese college freshmen in September 2019 using random cluster sampling method. Participants completed questionnaires on demographic information, food intake frequency, and GER symptoms. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to assess the association between beverages and GERD. Studies were retrieved from multiple databases for systemic review. The prevalence of GERD in young populations and beverage‐related risk factors were pooled using random‐effect models. Key Results: Based on the 3345 individuals who completed the questionnaires, GERD prevalence in Chinese college freshmen is 5.1%. Multivariate analysis showed students who drink green tea daily, and those who drink coffee regularly were more likely to develop GERD compared with those who never drink tea or coffee. The pooled prevalence of GERD in young populations is 18.0%, and frequent alcohol consumption is positively associated with GERD in general population. Conclusions and Inferences: The prevalence of GERD in Chinese college freshmen is significantly lower than that in worldwide youth populations. Alcohol, green tea, and coffee consumption could be potential risk factors for GERD. Future large‐scale epidemiological studies are warranted for reliable identification of beverage‐related risk factors for GERD in young populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.14266

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. 10.1001/jama.2020.21360 · DOI
  2. 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313589 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.5056/jnm18140 · DOI
  5. 10.3390/ijerph17197020 · DOI
  6. 10.1186/s13104-018-3569-1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1186/s12876-018-0832-9 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x · DOI
  9. 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.2.395 · DOI
  10. 10.1155/2014/124261 · DOI
  11. 10.1136/gut.2004.051821 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.005 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/s12876-020-01292-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jegh.2016.07.001 · DOI
  16. Arman K, 2016, Stress experience and effect on self‐perceived oral health status among high school students, Stomatologija, 18, 75
  17. 10.2147/IJGM.S206995 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.009 · DOI
  19. Bordbar G, 2015, Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): prevalence and association with psychological disorders among medical sciences students, Int J PharmTech Res, 8, 120
  20. Cardoso AL, 2018, Gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence and quality of life of health science undergraduate students, Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam, 48, 197
  21. 10.1111/jgh.12330 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/ppul.20399 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01089.x · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s10620-007-0150-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1186/s12876-020-01193-3 · DOI
  26. 10.5009/gnl.2009.3.3.192 · DOI
  27. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i13.3649 · DOI
  28. Somi MH, 2006, Prevalence and precipitating factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a young population of Tabriz, Northwest of Iran, Saudi Med J, 27, 1878
  29. 10.1159/000338849 · DOI
  30. 10.2169/internalmedicine.8669-16 · DOI
  31. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.005 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s12664-011-0112-x · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1097/01.mcg.0000225658.30803.79 · DOI
  34. 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7241 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s12664-018-00931-6 · DOI
  36. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01769.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.3748/wjg.v13.45.6009 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01402.x · DOI
  39. 10.1378/chest.127.5.1658 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/ejcn.2017.64 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1007/s00535-010-0359-5 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03561.x · DOI
  43. 10.1186/1471-230X-14-144 · DOI
  44. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.11.042 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/s10620-016-4341-9 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00121-7 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Lukić M, 2010, The role of the nutrition in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma, Coll Antropol, 34, 905
  48. 10.1371/journal.pone.0133865 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/s10620-011-1679-x · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s00535-016-1282-1 · DOI
  51. 10.1136/gut.2004.043265 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.12.008 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01287.x · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01417.x · DOI · Paper page
  55. Piqué N, 2016, Prevalence of severe esophagitis in Spain. Results of the PRESS study (Prevalence and Risk factors for Esophagitis in Spain: A cross‐sectional study). United European, Gastroenterol J, 4, 229
  56. 10.1038/ajg.2011.89 · DOI
  57. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31809e7126 · DOI
  58. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.5152/tjg.2015.150238 · DOI
  60. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03708.x · DOI
  61. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065996 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Asl SF, 2015, Evaluations of life style factors and the severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease; a case‐control study, Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet, 6, 27
  63. 10.1371/journal.pone.0173230 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s12664-010-0066-4 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02727.x · DOI
  66. 10.1080/00365520310004506 · DOI
  67. Gudjonsson H, 1995, The effect of coffee and tea upon lower esophageal sphincteric function, Laeknabladid, 81, 484
  68. 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.02.034 · DOI
  69. 10.1097/00042737-199911000-00015 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1994.tb00289.x · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1007/BF01296252 · DOI
  72. 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7333 · DOI
  73. 10.1080/01635581.2019.1636101 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.09.004 · DOI
  75. 10.2174/1574887111666160815103251 · DOI
  76. 10.1093/alcalc/agy063 · DOI

Cited by

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y., Chen, C., Ouyang, Z., Duan, C., Liu, J., Hou, X., & Bai, T.
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-09-28
Volume
34
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1350-1925
  • 1365-2982
DOI
10.1111/nmo.14266
Cited by
22
References
8
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.