The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large‐scale characterization of drought pattern: a continent‐wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt – spatial and temporal trends
Abstract
Summary: Plant response to drought is complex, so that traits adapted to a specific drought type can confer disadvantage in another drought type. Understanding which type(s) of drought to target is of prime importance for crop improvement. Modelling was used to quantify seasonal drought patterns for a check variety across the Australian wheatbelt, using 123 yr of weather data for representative locations and managements. Two other genotypes were used to simulate the impact of maturity on drought pattern. Four major environment types summarized the variability in drought pattern over time and space. Severe stress beginning before flowering was common (44% of occurrences), with (24%) or without (20%) relief during grain filling. High variability occurred from year to year, differing with geographical region. With few exceptions, all four environment types occurred in most seasons, for each location, management system and genotype. Applications of such environment characterization are proposed to assist breeding and research to focus on germplasm, traits and genes of interest for target environments. The method was applied at a continental scale to highly variable environments and could be extended to other crops, to other drought‐prone regions around the world, and to quantify potential changes in drought patterns under future climates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation
Keating, B. A., Carberry, P. S., Hammer, G. L., Probert, M. E., Robertson, M. J., Holzworth, D., Huth, N. I., Hargreaves, J. N. G., Meinke, H., Hochman, Z., et al. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00108-9 · Cited by 2,878
Self-citationCoumou, D., & Rahmstorf, S. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1452 · Cited by 2,289
Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data
Jeffrey, S. J., Carter, J. O., Moodie, K. B., & Beswick, A. R. (2001) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/s1364-8152(01)00008-1 · Cited by 1,990
Historical Warnings of Future Food Insecurity with Unprecedented Seasonal Heat
Battisti, D. S., & Naylor, R. L. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164363 · Cited by 1,752
Phenomics – technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck
Furbank, R. T., & Tester, M. (2011) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.09.005 · Cited by 1,675
Why are wheat yields stagnating in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France
Brisson, N., Gate, P., Gouache, D., Charmet, G., Oury, F.-X., & Huard, F. (2010) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.012 · Cited by 767
Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement
(1996) · doi:10.1079/9780851991085.0000 · Cited by 745
Nelson, D. E., Repetti, P. P., Adams, T. R., Creelman, R. A., Wu, J., Warner, D. C., Anstrom, D. C., Bensen, R. J., Castiglioni, P. P., Donnarummo, M. G., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707193104 · Cited by 743
The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments
Manschadi, A. M., Christopher, J., deVoil, P., & Hammer, G. L. (2006) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp06055 · Cited by 656
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Borlaug NE, 2005, In the wake of the double helix: from the green revolution to the gene revolution, 3
- 10.1007/s001220051410 · doi:10.1007/s001220051410
- 10.2134/agronj2003.9900 · DOI · Paper page
- ComstockRE1977.Quantitative genetics and the design of breeding programs. In:PollackE KempthorneO BaileyTB eds. Proceedings of the international conference on quantitative genetics. Iowa State University. Press Ames USA 705–718.
- IPCC, 2007, Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
- 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.008 · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.008
- SnapeJW2004.Challenges of integrating conventional breeding and biotechnology: a personal view!In: Proceedings of the 4th international crop science congress. Brisbane Australia 26 September‐1 October 2004:http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/plenary/3/1394_snapejw.htm.
- 10.2135/cropsci2001.4151461x · doi:10.2135/cropsci2001.4151461x
- 10.2135/cropsci2003.1698 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.1698
- Williams JH, 2002, Agro‐ecological regions of Australia. Methodologies for their derivation and key issues in resource management
Cited by
APSIM – evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation
Holzworth, D. P., Huth, N. I., deVoil, P. G., Zurcher, E. J., Herrmann, N. I., McLean, G., Chenu, K., van Oosterom, E. J., Snow, V., Murphy, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009 · Cited by 1,756
Self-citationHeslot, N., Akdemir, D., Sorrells, M. E., & Jannink, J.-L. (2014) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-013-2231-5 · Cited by 409
The shifting influence of drought and heat stress for crops in northeast Australia
Lobell, D. B., Hammer, G. L., Chenu, K., Zheng, B., McLean, G., & Chapman, S. C. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13022 · Cited by 310
Self-citationGenomic prediction of maize yield across European environmental conditions
Millet, E. J., Kruijer, W., Coupel-Ledru, A., Alvarez Prado, S., Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Lacube, S., Charcosset, A., Welcker, C., van Eeuwijk, F., & Tardieu, F. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0414-y · Cited by 280
van Eeuwijk, F. A., Bustos-Korts, D., Millet, E. J., Boer, M. P., Kruijer, W., Thompson, A., Malosetti, M., Iwata, H., Quiroz, R., Kuppe, C., et al. (2019) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.06.018 · Cited by 217
“For example, a wheat diversity panel segregating for 12 parameters of APSIM-wheat over 84 environments in the Australian wheat belt was simulated [156] (a subset of the environments shown in [138,157]).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chenu, K., Deihimfard, R., & Chapman, S. C.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-21
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 801-820
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2159589119
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 19.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 922 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large‐scale characterization of drought pattern: a continent‐wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt – spatial and temporal trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12192
- The paper
- Chenu, K., Deihimfard, R., & Chapman, S. C. (2013). Large‐scale characterization of drought pattern: a continent‐wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt – spatial and temporal trends. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
