The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species
Abstract
Summary: Absorptive root traits show remarkable cross‐species variation, but major root trait dimensions across species have not been defined. We sampled first‐order roots and measured 14 root traits for 96 angiosperm woody species from subtropical C hina, including root diameter, specific root length, stele diameter, cortex thickness, root vessel size and density, mycorrhizal colonization rate, root branching intensity, tissue density, and concentrations of carbon and nitrogen ([N]). Root traits differed in the degree of variation and phylogenetic conservatism, but showed predictable patterns of cross‐trait coordination. Root diameter, cortex thickness and stele diameter displayed high variation across species (coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.51–0.69), whereas the stele:root diameter ratio and [N] showed low variation (CV < 0.32). Root diameter, cortex thickness and stele diameter showed a strong phylogenetic signal across species, whereas root branching traits did not, and these two sets of traits were segregated onto two nearly orthogonal (independent) principal component analysis (PCA) axes. Two major dimensions of root trait variation were found: a diameter‐related dimension potentially integrating root construction, maintenance, and persistence with mycorrhizal colonization, and a branching architecture dimension expressing root plastic responses to the environment. These two dimensions may offer a promising path for better understanding root trait economics and root ecological strategies world‐wide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Angiosperm diversification through time
Magallón, S., & Castillo, A. (2009) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.0800060 · Cited by 439
Cited by
McCormack, M. L., Dickie, I. A., Eissenstat, D. M., Fahey, T. J., Fernandez, C. W., Guo, D., Helmisaari, H., Hobbie, E. A., Iversen, C. M., Jackson, R. B., et al. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13363 · Cited by 1,456
Self-citationFreschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Roumet, C., Birouste, M., Picon‐Cochard, C., Ghestem, M., Osman, N., Vrignon‐Brenas, S., Cao, K., & Stokes, A. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13828 · Cited by 566
Factors Influencing Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Natural Forests at the Biome Scale
Li, Y., He, N., Hou, J., Xu, L., Liu, C., Zhang, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, X., & Wu, X. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00064 · Cited by 499
Nonlinearity of root trait relationships and the root economics spectrum
Kong, D., Wang, J., Wu, H., Valverde-Barrantes, O. J., Wang, R., Zeng, H., Kardol, P., Zhang, H., & Feng, Y. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10245-6 · Cited by 322
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kong, D., Ma, C., Zhang, Q., Li, L., Chen, X., Zeng, H., & Guo, D.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-14
- Volume
- 203
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 863-872
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2117631271
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12842
- The paper
- Kong, D., Ma, C., Zhang, Q., Li, L., Chen, X., Zeng, H., & Guo, D. (2014). Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.