Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 577

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species

Kong, Deliang, Ma, Chengen, Zhang, Qian, Li, Le, Chen, Xiaoyong, Zeng, Hui, Guo, Dali·2014·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Absorptive root traits show remarkable cross‐species variation, but major root trait dimensions across species have not been defined. We sampled first‐order roots and measured 14 root traits for 96 angiosperm woody species from subtropical C hina, including root diameter, specific root length, stele diameter, cortex thickness, root vessel size and density, mycorrhizal colonization rate, root branching intensity, tissue density, and concentrations of carbon and nitrogen ([N]). Root traits differed in the degree of variation and phylogenetic conservatism, but showed predictable patterns of cross‐trait coordination. Root diameter, cortex thickness and stele diameter displayed high variation across species (coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.51–0.69), whereas the stele:root diameter ratio and [N] showed low variation (CV < 0.32). Root diameter, cortex thickness and stele diameter showed a strong phylogenetic signal across species, whereas root branching traits did not, and these two sets of traits were segregated onto two nearly orthogonal (independent) principal component analysis (PCA) axes. Two major dimensions of root trait variation were found: a diameter‐related dimension potentially integrating root construction, maintenance, and persistence with mycorrhizal colonization, and a branching architecture dimension expressing root plastic responses to the environment. These two dimensions may offer a promising path for better understanding root trait economics and root ecological strategies world‐wide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.12842

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 577

Metadata

Authors
Kong, D., Ma, C., Zhang, Q., Li, L., Chen, X., Zeng, H., & Guo, D.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-14
Volume
203
Issue
3
Pages
863-872
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2117631271
Cited by
577
References
2
FWCI
27.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12842
The paper
Kong, D., Ma, C., Zhang, Q., Li, L., Chen, X., Zeng, H., & Guo, D. (2014). Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12842

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.