The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magical mystery tour: MLO proteins in plant immunity and beyond
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Stable heritable restriction of the ubiquitous powdery mildew disease is a desirable trait for agri‐ and horticulture. In barley (H ordeum vulgare), loss‐of‐function mutant alleles of the Mildew resistance locus o (Mlo) gene confer broad‐spectrum resistance to almost all known isolates of the fungal barley powdery mildew pathogen, B lumeria graminis f.sp. hordei. Despite extensive cultivation of barley mlo genotypes, mlo resistance has been durable in the field. Mlo genes are present as small families in the genomes of all higher plant species. The presumed negative regulatory role of particular members in plant immunity is evolutionarily conserved, as powdery mildew resistant mlo mutants have also been described in A rabidopsis thaliana, tomato (S olanum lycopersicum) and pea (P isum sativum). Barley Mlo encodes a plasma membrane‐localized seven‐transmembrane domain protein of unknown biochemical activity. Here, we review the known requirements for mlo‐mediated disease resistance in barley and Arabidopsis and reflect current views regarding Mlo function. We discuss additional mlo mutant phenotypes recently discovered in Arabidopsis and present a meta‐analysis of the phylogenetic relationships within the Mlo family. Finally, we consider the novel versatile tools for functional analysis and targeted genome modification that can be used to induce mlo‐based powdery mildew resistance in virtually any plant species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea
Wiedenheft, B., Sternberg, S. H., & Doudna, J. A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10886 · Cited by 1,851
Cited by
Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion
Nekrasov, V., Wang, C., Win, J., Lanz, C., Weigel, D., & Kamoun, S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00578-x · Cited by 757
Genome-edited powdery mildew resistance in wheat without growth penalties
Li, S., Lin, D., Zhang, Y., Deng, M., Chen, Y., Lv, B., Li, B., Lei, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, L., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04395-9 · Cited by 499
Plant Malectin-Like Receptor Kinases: From Cell Wall Integrity to Immunity and Beyond
Franck, C. M., Westermann, J., & Boisson-Dernier, A. (2018) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040557 · Cited by 267
Zaidi, S. S.-E.-A., Mahas, A., Vanderschuren, H., & Mahfouz, M. M. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02204-y · Cited by 221
Advanced domestication: harnessing the precision of gene editing in crop breeding
Lyzenga, W. J., Pozniak, C. J., & Kagale, S. (2021) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13576 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Acevedo‐Garcia, J., Kusch, S., & Panstruga, R.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06-11
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-281
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2030707763
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magical mystery tour: MLO proteins in plant immunity and beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12889
- The paper
- Acevedo‐Garcia, J., Kusch, S., & Panstruga, R. (2014). Magical mystery tour: MLO proteins in plant immunity and beyond. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.