Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 419

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

E ffector P: predicting fungal effector proteins from secretomes using machine learning

Sperschneider, Jana, Gardiner, Donald M., Dodds, Peter N., Tini, Francesco, Covarelli, Lorenzo, Singh, Karam B., Manners, John M., Taylor, Jennifer M.·2016·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Eukaryotic filamentous plant pathogens secrete effector proteins that modulate the host cell to facilitate infection. Computational effector candidate identification and subsequent functional characterization delivers valuable insights into plant–pathogen interactions. However, effector prediction in fungi has been challenging due to a lack of unifying sequence features such as conserved N‐terminal sequence motifs. Fungal effectors are commonly predicted from secretomes based on criteria such as small size and cysteine‐rich, which suffers from poor accuracy. We present E ffector P which pioneers the application of machine learning to fungal effector prediction. E ffector P improves fungal effector prediction from secretomes based on a robust signal of sequence‐derived properties, achieving sensitivity and specificity of over 80%. Features that discriminate fungal effectors from secreted noneffectors are predominantly sequence length, molecular weight and protein net charge, as well as cysteine, serine and tryptophan content. We demonstrate that E ffector P is powerful when combined with in planta expression data for predicting high‐priority effector candidates. E ffector P is the first prediction program for fungal effectors based on machine learning. Our findings will facilitate functional fungal effector studies and improve our understanding of effectors in plant–pathogen interactions. E ffector P is available at http://effectorp.csiro.au.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.13794

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 419

Metadata

Authors
Sperschneider, J., Gardiner, D. M., Dodds, P. N., Tini, F., Covarelli, L., Singh, K. B., Manners, J. M., & Taylor, J. M.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-17
Volume
210
Issue
2
Pages
743-761
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2213426519
Cited by
419
References
4
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E ffector P: predicting fungal effector proteins from secretomes using machine learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13794
The paper
Sperschneider, J., Gardiner, D. M., Dodds, P. N., Tini, F., Covarelli, L., Singh, K. B., Manners, J. M., & Taylor, J. M. (2016). E ffector P: predicting fungal effector proteins from secretomes using machine learning. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13794

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.