The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E ffector P: predicting fungal effector proteins from secretomes using machine learning
Abstract
Summary: Eukaryotic filamentous plant pathogens secrete effector proteins that modulate the host cell to facilitate infection. Computational effector candidate identification and subsequent functional characterization delivers valuable insights into plant–pathogen interactions. However, effector prediction in fungi has been challenging due to a lack of unifying sequence features such as conserved N‐terminal sequence motifs. Fungal effectors are commonly predicted from secretomes based on criteria such as small size and cysteine‐rich, which suffers from poor accuracy. We present E ffector P which pioneers the application of machine learning to fungal effector prediction. E ffector P improves fungal effector prediction from secretomes based on a robust signal of sequence‐derived properties, achieving sensitivity and specificity of over 80%. Features that discriminate fungal effectors from secreted noneffectors are predominantly sequence length, molecular weight and protein net charge, as well as cysteine, serine and tryptophan content. We demonstrate that E ffector P is powerful when combined with in planta expression data for predicting high‐priority effector candidates. E ffector P is the first prediction program for fungal effectors based on machine learning. Our findings will facilitate functional fungal effector studies and improve our understanding of effectors in plant–pathogen interactions. E ffector P is available at http://effectorp.csiro.au.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions
Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G., & Nielsen, H. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1701 · Cited by 8,847
Top 10 algorithms in data mining
Wu, X., Kumar, V., Ross Quinlan, J., Ghosh, J., Yang, Q., Motoda, H., McLachlan, G. J., Ng, A., Liu, B., Yu, P. S., et al. (2008) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2 · Cited by 5,667
O'Connell, R. J., Thon, M. R., Hacquard, S., Amyotte, S. G., Kleemann, J., Torres, M. F., Damm, U., Buiate, E. A., Epstein, L., Alkan, N., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2372 · Cited by 1,047
Cited by
LOCALIZER: subcellular localization prediction of both plant and effector proteins in the plant cell
Sperschneider, J., Catanzariti, A.-M., DeBoer, K., Petre, B., Gardiner, D. M., Singh, K. B., Dodds, P. N., & Taylor, J. M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44598 · Cited by 466
Self-citationBanerjee, S., Bhandary, P., Woodhouse, M., Sen, T. Z., Wise, R. P., & Andorf, C. M. (2021) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-021-04120-9 · Cited by 35
The origin, deployment, and evolution of a plant-parasitic nematode effectorome
Molloy, B., Shin, D. S., Long, J., Pellegrin, C., Senatori, B., Vieira, P., Thorpe, P. J., Damm, A., Ahmad, M., Vermeulen, K., et al. (2024) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012395 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Sperschneider, J., Gardiner, D. M., Dodds, P. N., Tini, F., Covarelli, L., Singh, K. B., Manners, J. M., & Taylor, J. M.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-12-17
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 743-761
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2213426519
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E ffector P: predicting fungal effector proteins from secretomes using machine learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13794
- The paper
- Sperschneider, J., Gardiner, D. M., Dodds, P. N., Tini, F., Covarelli, L., Singh, K. B., Manners, J. M., & Taylor, J. M. (2016). E ffector P: predicting fungal effector proteins from secretomes using machine learning. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.