The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms of plant–soil feedback: interactions among biotic and abiotic drivers
Abstract
Contents Summary 91 I. Introduction 91 II. Primary PSF mechanisms 91 III. Factors mediating the mechanisms of PSF 93 IV. Conclusions and future directions 94 Acknowledgements 95 Author contributions 95 References 95 Summary: Plant–soil feedback (PSF) occurs when plants alter soil properties that influence the performance of seedlings, with consequent effects on plant populations and communities. Many processes influence PSF, including changes in nutrient availability and the accumulation of natural enemies, mutualists or secondary chemicals. Typically, these mechanisms are investigated in isolation, yet no single mechanism is likely to be completely responsible for PSF as these processes can interact. Further, the outcome depends on which resources are limiting and the other plants and soil biota in the surrounding environment. As such, understanding the mechanisms of PSF and their role within plant communities requires quantification of the interactions among the processes influencing PSF and the associated abiotic and biotic contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome
Bahram, M., Hildebrand, F., Forslund, S. K., Anderson, J. L., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Bodegom, P. M., Bengtsson-Palme, J., Anslan, S., Coelho, L. P., Harend, H., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0386-6 · Cited by 2,538
Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems
Grace, J. B. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617799 · Cited by 2,432
Assembly and ecological function of the root microbiome across angiosperm plant species
Fitzpatrick, C. R., Copeland, J., Wang, P. W., Guttman, D. S., Kotanen, P. M., & Johnson, M. T. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1717617115 · Cited by 1,093
Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales
Johnson, N. C. (2010) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03110.x · Cited by 961
Ectomycorrhizal fungi – potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs
Lindahl, B. D., & Tunlid, A. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13201 · Cited by 851
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826
Self-citationPlant-soil feedbacks and mycorrhizal type influence temperate forest population dynamics
Bennett, J. A., Maherali, H., Reinhart, K. O., Lekberg, Y., Hart, M. M., & Klironomos, J. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aai8212 · Cited by 752
Self-citationPolyphenol control of nitrogen release from pine litter
Northup, R. R., Yu, Z., Dahlgren, R. A., & Vogt, K. A. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377227a0 · Cited by 627
Plant species effects on nutrient cycling: revisiting litter feedbacks
Hobbie, S. E. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.015 · Cited by 583
KLANDERUD, K., & TOTLAND, O. (2005) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01000.x · Cited by 451
Cited by
Pugnaire, F. I., Morillo, J. A., Peñuelas, J., Reich, P. B., Bardgett, R. D., Gaxiola, A., Wardle, D. A., & van der Putten, W. H. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz1834 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, J. A., & Klironomos, J.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-11
- Volume
- 222
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-96
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2901356617
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 20.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of plant–soil feedback: interactions among biotic and abiotic drivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.15603
- The paper
- Bennett, J. A., & Klironomos, J. (2019). Mechanisms of plant–soil feedback: interactions among biotic and abiotic drivers. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
