The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Despite the fact that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) associations are among the most ancient, abundant and important symbioses in terrestrial ecosystems, there are currently few unifying theories that can be used to help understand the factors that control their structure and function. This review explores how a stoichiometric perspective facilitates integration of three complementary ecological and evolutionary models of mycorrhizal structure and function. AM symbiotic function should be governed by the relative availability of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus (trade balance model) and allocation to plant and fungal structures should depend on the availabilities of these resources (functional equilibrium model). Moreover, in an evolutionary framework, communities of plants and AM fungi are predicted to adapt to each other and their local soil environment (co‐adaptation model). Anthropogenic enrichment of essential resources in the environment is known to impact AM symbioses. A more predictive theory of AM structure and function will help us to better understand how these impacts may influence plant communities and ecosystem properties. Contents Summary 631 I. Introduction 632 II. Overview of ecological and evolutionary models from a stoichiometric perspective 632 III. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in AM symbioses 634 IV. Trade balance and thresholds in the AM marketplace 635 V. Optimal foraging and functional equilibrium in AM symbioses 638 VI. Fungal life histories and resource utilization 640 VII. Community feedbacks, co‐adaptation and ecosystem consequences 641 VIII. The scaling‐up challenge 643 Acknowledgements 643 References 643
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-370526-6.x5001-6 · Cited by 7,431
(2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1009-2 · Cited by 5,491
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere
Sterner, R. W., & Elser, J. J. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,476
Resource Competition and Community Structure.
Harper, J. L., & Tilman, D. (1983) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259756 · Cited by 4,180
Resource Competition and Community Structure
Hassell, M. P., & Tilman, D. (1984) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4549 · Cited by 4,176
Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy
Bloom, A. J., Chapin, F. S., & Mooney, H. A. (1985) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002051 · Cited by 2,725
Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-0924 · Cited by 2,299
Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis
Augé, R. M. (2001) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s005720100097 · Cited by 2,210
Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review
Pyke, G. H. (1984) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.15.1.523 · Cited by 2,210
Cited by
Biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ecosystem function
Powell, J. R., & Rillig, M. C. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15119 · Cited by 508
Mechanisms of plant–soil feedback: interactions among biotic and abiotic drivers
Bennett, J. A., & Klironomos, J. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15603 · Cited by 438
Lekberg, Y., Arnillas, C. A., Borer, E. T., Bullington, L. S., Fierer, N., Kennedy, P. G., Leff, J. W., Luis, A. D., Seabloom, E. W., & Henning, J. A. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23605-y · Cited by 319
de Graaff, M.-A., Hornslein, N., Throop, H. L., Kardol, P., & van Diepen, L. T. A. (2019) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2019.01.001 · Cited by 234
Plant phosphorus-use and -acquisition strategies in Amazonia
Reichert, T., Rammig, A., Fuchslueger, L., Lugli, L. F., Quesada, C. A., & Fleischer, K. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17985 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, N. C.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-03
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 631-647
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2151158511
- Cited by
- 961
- References
- 125
- FWCI
- 25.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03110.x
- The paper
- Johnson, N. C. (2010). Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03110.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.