Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 961

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales

Open access
Johnson, Nancy Collins·2010·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Despite the fact that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) associations are among the most ancient, abundant and important symbioses in terrestrial ecosystems, there are currently few unifying theories that can be used to help understand the factors that control their structure and function. This review explores how a stoichiometric perspective facilitates integration of three complementary ecological and evolutionary models of mycorrhizal structure and function. AM symbiotic function should be governed by the relative availability of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus (trade balance model) and allocation to plant and fungal structures should depend on the availabilities of these resources (functional equilibrium model). Moreover, in an evolutionary framework, communities of plants and AM fungi are predicted to adapt to each other and their local soil environment (co‐adaptation model). Anthropogenic enrichment of essential resources in the environment is known to impact AM symbioses. A more predictive theory of AM structure and function will help us to better understand how these impacts may influence plant communities and ecosystem properties. Contents Summary 631 I. Introduction 632 II. Overview of ecological and evolutionary models from a stoichiometric perspective 632 III. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in AM symbioses 634 IV. Trade balance and thresholds in the AM marketplace 635 V. Optimal foraging and functional equilibrium in AM symbioses 638 VI. Fungal life histories and resource utilization 640 VII. Community feedbacks, co‐adaptation and ecosystem consequences 641 VIII. The scaling‐up challenge 643 Acknowledgements 643 References 643

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03110.x

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 125 references

Cited by

See all 961

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, N. C.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-03
Volume
185
Issue
3
Pages
631-647
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2151158511
Cited by
961
References
125
FWCI
25.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03110.x
The paper
Johnson, N. C. (2010). Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03110.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.