Cited by 48Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsPlant Molecular Biology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single‐cell proteomics differentiates Arabidopsis root cell types

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Summary: Single‐cell proteomics (SCP) is an emerging approach to resolve cellular heterogeneity within complex tissues of multi‐cellular organisms. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of SCP on plant samples using the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana . Specifically, we focused on examining isolated single cells from the cortex and endodermis, which are two adjacent root cell types derived from a common stem cell lineage. From 756 root cells, we identified 3763 proteins and 1118 proteins/cell. Ultimately, we focus on 3217 proteins quantified following stringent filtering. Of these, we identified 596 proteins whose expression is enriched in either the cortex or endodermis and are able to differentiate these closely related plant cell types. Collectivity, this study demonstrates that SCP can resolve neighboring cell types with distinct functions, thereby facilitating the identification of biomarkers and candidate proteins to enable functional genomics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.19923

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1242/dev.119.1.57 · DOI
  2. 10.1105/tpc.17.00983 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nmeth0805-615 · DOI
  4. 10.15252/msb.202110798 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1186/s13059-018-1547-5 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007082 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/plphys/kiab429 · DOI
  8. 10.1039/D0SC03636F · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100665 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/jxb/erv330 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41598-019-46327-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41587-022-01389-w · DOI
  13. 10.1242/dev.119.1.71 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41477-018-0213-y · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101978 · DOI
  16. 10.1242/dev.057745 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nature02046 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00039 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s41592-023-01830-1 · DOI
  20. 10.1074/mcp.R120.002234 · DOI
  21. 10.3389/fpls.2022.953225 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00441 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.0510607103 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.045 · DOI
  25. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00661 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04240 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1515576112 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.014 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1021/acsomega.0c00080 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05022 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/pmic.201400036 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.adf4721 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41467-022-34919-w · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41596-021-00616-z · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41467-023-41602-1 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/jxb/erv432 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nature10070 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41467-018-07393-6 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/jasms.3c00240 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41467-021-23667-y · DOI
  41. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-081720-010120 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.01.008 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.04.018 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100179 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/pmic.201800220 · DOI
  46. 10.1186/s13059-021-02267-5 · DOI · Paper page
  47. SpechtH HarmangeG PerlmanDH EmmottE NiziolekZ BudnikB SlavovN.2018.Automated sample preparation for high‐throughput single‐cell proteomics.bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/399774. · DOI
  48. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00675 · DOI
  49. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00990 · DOI
  50. 10.15252/msb.202211503 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/nprot.2016.136 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/14789450.2021.1988571 · DOI
  53. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00227 · DOI
  54. 10.1126/science.aag1125 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/nmeth.1322 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Montes, C., Zhang, J., Nolan, T. M., & Walley, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Walley, Justin W.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-06-24
Volume
244
Issue
5
Pages
1750-1759
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W4399978423
Cited by
48
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Plant Sciences Institute, Iowa State University
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (2010686, 2039489)
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (IOW04108)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
single-cell proteomics, Arabidopsis thaliana, root cell types, root cortex, root endodermis, cell differentiation, cellular heterogeneity, biomarkers, root development
MeSH terms
Arabidopsis, Plant Roots, Arabidopsis Proteins, Proteomics, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single‐cell proteomics differentiates Arabidopsis root cell types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.19923
The paper
Montes, C., Zhang, J., Nolan, T. M., & Walley, J. W. (2024). Single‐cell proteomics differentiates Arabidopsis root cell types. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19923