Cited by 16Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsPlant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies

Simple sequence repeats and their expansions: Role in plant development, environmental response and adaptation

Open access
Sureshkumar, Sridevi, Chhabra, Aaryan, Guo, Ya‐Long, Balasubramanian, Sureshkumar·2025·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Repetitive DNA is a feature of all organisms, ranging from archaea and plants to humans. DNA repeats can be seen both in coding and in noncoding regions of the genome. Due to the recurring nature of the sequences, simple DNA repeats tend to be more prone to errors during replication and repair, resulting in variability in their unit length. This feature of simple sequence repeats led to their use as molecular markers for mapping traits in diverse organisms. Advances in genomics, and the ever‐reducing costs of genome sequencing have empowered us to assess the functional impacts of DNA repeats. The variability in repeat lengths can cause phenotypic differences depending on where they are present in the genome. Variability in the repeat length in coding regions of genes results in poly amino acid stretches that appear to interfere with protein function, including the perturbation of protein–protein interactions with diverse phenotypic impacts. These are often common allelic variations that can significantly impact evolutionary dynamics. In extreme situations, repeats can undergo massive expansions and appear as outliers. Repeat expansions underlie several genetic defects in plants to diseases in humans. This review systematically analyses tandem DNA repeats in plants, their role in development and environmental response and adaptation in plants. We identify and synthesise emerging themes, differentiate repeat length variability and repeat expansions, and argue that many repeat‐associated phenotypes in plants are yet to be discovered. We emphasise the underexplored nature and immense potential of this area of research, particularly in plants, and suggest ways in which this can be achieved and how it might contribute to evolution and agricultural productivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.70173

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SSR assays are suitable for verifying the purity of cultivars in Arabidopsis and maize.

    “Plant researchers use simple sequence repeat (SSR) assays, which are suitable for verifying the purity of cultivars in Arabidopsis and maize [70].”

    From Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review (2026) · cites this paper as [70]

    The “Repeats in plant genomes” section (page unavailable) says plant geneticists use microsatellites as markers for mapping and marker-assisted selection. It does not say that SSR assays verify cultivar purity in Arabidopsis or maize; searches for purity and cultivar identification did not find that application in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 127

  1. Agren JA, Wang W, Koenig D, Neuffer B, Weigel D, Wright SI. 2014. Mating system shifts and transposable element evolution in the plant genus Capsella. BMC Genomics 15: 602. 25030755 PMC4112209
  2. Aksenova AY, Mirkin SM. 2019. At the beginning of the end and in the middle of the beginning: structure and maintenance of telomeric DNA repeats and interstitial telomeric sequences. Genes (Basel) 10: 458. 30764567 PMC6410037
  3. Al‐Mahdawi S, Pinto RM, Ismail O, Varshney D, Lymperi S, Sandi C, Trabzuni D, Pook M. 2008. The Friedreich ataxia GAA repeat expansion mutation induces comparable epigenetic changes in human and transgenic mouse brain and heart tissues. Human Molecular Genetics 17: 735– 746. 18045775
  4. Al‐Mahdawi S, Pinto RM, Ruddle P, Carroll C, Webster Z, Pook M. 2004. GAA repeat instability in Friedreich ataxia YAC transgenic mice. Genomics 84: 301– 310. 15233994
  5. Al‐Mahdawi S, Pinto RM, Varshney D, Lawrence L, Lowrie MB, Hughes S, Webster Z, Blake J, Cooper JM, King R et al. 2006. GAA repeat expansion mutation mouse models of Friedreich ataxia exhibit oxidative stress leading to progressive neuronal and cardiac pathology. Genomics 88: 580– 590. 16919418 PMC2842930
  6. Anjomani Virmouni S, Ezzatizadeh V, Sandi C, Sandi M, Al‐Mahdawi S, Chutake Y, Pook MA. 2015. A novel GAA repeat expansion‐based mouse model of Friedreich ataxia. Disease Models & Mechanisms 8: 225– 235. 25681319 PMC4348561
  7. Bedbrook JR, Jones J, O'Dell M, Thompson RD, Flavell RB. 1980. A molecular description of telometic heterochromatin in secale species. Cell 19: 545– 560. 6244112
  8. Belser C, Baurens FC, Noel B, Martin G, Cruaud C, Istace B, Yahiaoui N, Labadie K, Hribova E, Dolezel J et al. 2021. Telomere‐to‐telomere gapless chromosomes of banana using nanopore sequencing. Communications Biology 4: 1047. 34493830 PMC8423783
  9. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005. Genome size evolution in plants. London, UK: Academic Press.
  10. Bilen J, Bonini NM. 2005. Drosophila as a model for human neurodegenerative disease. Annual Review of Genetics 39: 153– 171. 16285856
  11. Birnboim HC, Straus NA. 1975. DNA from eukaryotic cells contains unusually long pyrimidine sequences. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry 53: 640– 643. 1170009
  12. Box MS, Huang BE, Domijan M, Jaeger KE, Khattak AK, Yoo SJ, Sedivy EL, Jones DM, Hearn TJ, Webb AA et al. 2015. ELF3 controls thermoresponsive growth in Arabidopsis. Current Biology 25: 194– 199. 25557663
  13. Britten RJ, Kohne DE. 1968. Repeated sequences in DNA. Hundreds of thousands of copies of DNA sequences have been incorporated into the genomes of higher organisms. Science 161: 529– 540. 4874239
  14. Bryan AC, Zhang J, Guo J, Ranjan P, Singan V, Barry K, Schmutz J, Weighill D, Jacobson D, Jawdy S et al. 2018. A variable polyglutamine repeat affects subcellular localization and regulatory activity of a populus ANGUSTIFOLIA protein. G3 (Bethesda) 8: 2631– 2641. 29884614 PMC6071607
  15. Bunting EL, Hamilton J, Tabrizi SJ. 2022. Polyglutamine diseases. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 72: 39– 47. 34488036
  16. Campuzano V, Montermini L, Molto MD, Pianese L, Cossee M, Cavalcanti F, Monros E, Rodius F, Duclos F, Monticelli A et al. 1996. Friedreich's ataxia: autosomal recessive disease caused by an intronic GAA triplet repeat expansion. Science 271: 1423– 1427. 8596916
  17. Cao X, Jacobsen SE. 2002. Role of the arabidopsis DRM methyltransferases in de novo DNA methylation and gene silencing. Current Biology 12: 1138– 1144. 12121623
  18. Chen J, Wang Z, Tan K, Huang W, Shi J, Li T, Hu J, Wang K, Wang C, Xin B et al. 2023. A complete telomere‐to‐telomere assembly of the maize genome. Nature Genetics 55: 1221– 1231. 37322109 PMC10335936
  19. Chutake YK, Lam C, Costello WN, Anderson M, Bidichandani SI. 2014. Epigenetic promoter silencing in Friedreich ataxia is dependent on repeat length. Annals of Neurology 76: 522– 528. 25112975 PMC4191993
  20. Chutake YK, Lam CC, Costello WN, Anderson MP, Bidichandani SI. 2016. Reversal of epigenetic promoter silencing in Friedreich ataxia by a class I histone deacetylase inhibitor. Nucleic Acids Research 44: 5095– 5104. 26896803 PMC4914082
  21. Clark L, Sue‐Ob K, Mukkawar V, Jones AR, Sadanandom A. 2022. Understanding SUMO‐mediated adaptive responses in plants to improve crop productivity. Essays in Biochemistry 66: 155– 168. 35920279 PMC9400072
  22. Coluccio MP, Sanchez SE, Kasulin L, Yanovsky MJ, Botto JF. 2011. Genetic mapping of natural variation in a shade avoidance response: ELF3 is the candidate gene for a QTL in hypocotyl growth regulation. Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 167– 176. 20713464 PMC2993907
  23. Comai L, Maheshwari S, Marimuthu MPA. 2017. Plant centromeres. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 36: 158– 167. 28411416
  24. Condit R, Hubbell SP. 1991. Abundance and DNA sequence of two‐base repeat regions in tropical tree genomes. Genome 34: 66– 71. 1827419
  25. Consortium TGP, Alonso‐Blanco CC, Ashkenazy H, Baduel P, Bao Z, Becker C, Caillieux E, Colot V, Crosbie D, De Oliveira L et al. 2024. The 1001G+ project: a curated collection of Arabidopsis thaliana long‐read genome assemblies to advance plant research. BioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.23.629943. · DOI
  26. Darling AL, Uversky VN. 2017. Intrinsic disorder in proteins with pathogenic repeat expansions. Molecules 22: 2027. 29186753 PMC6149999
  27. Deng Y, Liu S, Zhang Y, Tan J, Li X, Chu X, Xu B, Tian Y, Sun Y, Li B et al. 2022. A telomere‐to‐telomere gap‐free reference genome of watermelon and its mutation library provide important resources for gene discovery and breeding. Molecular Plant 15: 1268– 1284. 35746868
  28. Dent C, Singh S, Mukherjee S, Mishra S, Sarwade RD, Shamaya N, Loo KP, Harrison PF, Sureshkumar S, Powell D et al. 2021. Quantifying splice‐site usage: a simple yet powerful approach to analyse splicing. Nucleic Acids Research Genomics and Bioinformatics 3: lqab041. PMC8121094 34017946
  29. Dent CI, Prodic S, Balakrishnan A, Georges J, Chhabra A, Mukherjee S, Coutts J, Gitonobel M, Sarwade R, Rosenbluh J et al. 2024. A basic framework governing splice‐site choice in eukaryotes. BioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.21.586179. PMC12480690 41022769 · DOI
  30. Dimitri P, Junakovic N. 1999. Revising the selfish DNA hypothesis: new evidence on accumulation of transposable elements in heterochromatin. Trends in Genetics 15: 123– 124. 10203812
  31. Dolatabadian A, Patel DA, Edwards D, Batley J. 2017. Copy number variation and disease resistance in plants. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 130: 2479– 2490. 29043379
  32. Doolittle WF, Sapienza C. 1980. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature 284: 601– 603. 6245369
  33. Dorsman JC, Pepers B, Langenberg D, Kerkdijk H, Ijszenga M, den Dunnen JT, Roos RA, van Ommen GJ. 2002. Strong aggregation and increased toxicity of polyleucine over polyglutamine stretches in mammalian cells. Human Molecular Genetics 11: 1487– 1496. 12045202
  34. Dremsek P, Schwarz T, Weil B, Malashka A, Laccone F, Neesen J. 2021. Optical genome mapping in routine human genetic diagnostics‐its advantages and limitations. Genes (Basel) 12: 548. 34946907 PMC8701374
  35. Eimer H, Sureshkumar S, Singh Yadav A, Kraupner‐Taylor C, Bandaranayake C, Seleznev A, Thomason T, Fletcher SJ, Gordon SF, Carroll BJ et al. 2018. RNA‐dependent epigenetic silencing directs transcriptional downregulation caused by intronic repeat expansions. Cell 174: 1095– 1105. 30057112
  36. Ellegren H. 2004. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nature Reviews. Genetics 5: 435– 445. 15153996
  37. Facchini S, Dominik N, Manini A, Efthymiou S, Curro R, Rugginini B, Vegezzi E, Quartesan I, Perrone B, Kutty SK et al. 2023. Optical genome mapping enables detection and accurate sizing of RFC1 repeat expansions. Biomolecules 13: 589. 37892228 PMC10605474
  38. Feschotte C. 2023. Transposable elements: McClintock's legacy revisited. Nature Reviews. Genetics 24: 797– 800. 37723348
  39. Flavell RB, Bennett MD, Smith JB, Smith DB. 1974. Genome size and the proportion of repeated nucleotide sequence DNA in plants. Biochemical Genetics 12: 257– 269. 4441361
  40. Fotsing SF, Margoliash J, Wang C, Saini S, Yanicky R, Shleizer‐Burko S, Goren A, Gymrek M. 2019. The impact of short tandem repeat variation on gene expression. Nature Genetics 51: 1652– 1659. 31676866 PMC6917484
  41. Fresard L, Smail C, Ferraro NM, Teran NA, Li X, Smith KS, Bonner D, Kernohan KD, Marwaha S, Zappala Z et al. 2019. Identification of rare‐disease genes using blood transcriptome sequencing and large control cohorts. Nature Medicine 25: 911– 919. PMC6634302 31160820
  42. Garrido‐Cardenas JA, Mesa‐Valle C, Manzano‐Agugliaro F. 2018. Trends in plant research using molecular markers. Planta 247: 543– 557. 29243155
  43. Gymrek M, Goren A. 2021. Missing heritability may be hiding in repeats. Science 373: 1440– 1441. 34554784
  44. Gymrek M, Willems T, Guilmatre A, Zeng H, Markus B, Georgiev S, Daly MJ, Price AL, Pritchard JK, Sharp AJ et al. 2016. Abundant contribution of short tandem repeats to gene expression variation in humans. Nature Genetics 48: 22– 29. 26642241 PMC4909355
  45. Hancock JM. 1995. The contribution of slippage‐like processes to genome evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 41: 1038– 1047. 8587102
  46. Hassan AH, Mokhtar MM, El Allali A. 2023. Transposable elements: multifunctional players in the plant genome. Frontiers in Plant Science 14: 1330127. 38239225 PMC10794571
  47. He H, Leng Y, Cao X, Zhu Y, Li X, Yuan Q, Zhang B, He W, Wei H, Liu X et al. 2024. The pan‐tandem repeat map highlights multiallelic variants underlying gene expression and agronomic traits in rice. Nature Communications 15: 7291. PMC11344853 39181885
  48. Herman D, Jenssen K, Burnett R, Soragni E, Perlman SL, Gottesfeld JM. 2006. Histone deacetylase inhibitors reverse gene silencing in Friedreich's ataxia. Nature Chemical Biology 2: 551– 558. 16921367
  49. Herrero E, Kolmos E, Bujdoso N, Yuan Y, Wang M, Berns MC, Uhlworm H, Coupland G, Saini R, Jaskolski M et al. 2012. EARLY FLOWERING4 recruitment of EARLY FLOWERING3 in the nucleus sustains the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 24: 428– 443. 22327739 PMC3315225
  50. Hicks KA, Albertson TM, Wagner DR. 2001. EARLY FLOWERING3 encodes a novel protein that regulates circadian clock function and flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13: 1281– 1292. 11402160 PMC135582
  51. Huntington Consortium. 1993. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes: The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell 72: 971– 983. 8458085
  52. Hutin S, Kumita JR, Strotmann VI, Dolata A, Ling WL, Louafi N, Popov A, Milhiet PE, Blackledge M, Nanao MH et al. 2023. Phase separation and molecular ordering of the prion‐like domain of the Arabidopsis thermosensory protein EARLY FLOWERING 3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 120: e2304714120. PMC10334799 37399408
  53. Ingle J, Pearson GG, Sinclair J. 1973. Species distribution and properties of nuclear satellite DNA in higher plants. Nature: New Biology 242: 193– 197. 4574004
  54. Ishiura H, Tsuji S, Toda T. 2023. Recent advances in CGG repeat diseases and a proposal of fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease, and oculophryngodistal myopathy (FNOP) spectrum disorder. Journal of Human Genetics 68: 169– 174. 36670296 PMC9968658
  55. Jiang J, Xu YC, Zhang ZQ, Chen JF, Niu XM, Hou XH, Li XT, Wang L, Zhang YE, Ge S et al. 2024. Forces driving transposable element load variation during Arabidopsis range expansion. Plant Cell 36: 840– 862. 38036296 PMC10980350
  56. Jimenez‐Gomez JM, Corwin JA, Joseph B, Maloof JN, Kliebenstein DJ. 2011. Genomic analysis of QTLs and genes altering natural variation in stochastic noise. PLoS Genetics 7: e1002295. 21980300 PMC3183082
  57. Joseph B, Lau L, Kliebenstein DJ. 2015. Quantitative variation in responses to root spatial constraint within Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 27: 2227– 2243. 26243313 PMC4568506
  58. Jung JH, Barbosa AD, Hutin S, Kumita JR, Gao M, Derwort D, Silva CS, Lai X, Pierre E, Geng F et al. 2020. A prion‐like domain in ELF3 functions as a thermosensor in Arabidopsis. Nature 585: 256– 260. 32848244
  59. Kalef‐Ezra E, Edzeamey FJ, Valle A, Khonsari H, Kleine P, Oggianu C, Al‐Mahdawi S, Pook MA, Anjomani Virmouni S. 2023. A new FRDA mouse model [Fxn (null):YG8s(GAA) > 800] with more than 800 GAA repeats. Frontiers in Neuroscience 17: 459. PMC9909538 36777637
  60. Kidwell MG, Lisch DR. 2000. Transposable elements and host genome evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15: 95– 99. 10675923
  61. Kim E, Napierala M, Dent SY. 2011. Hyperexpansion of GAA repeats affects post‐initiation steps of FXN transcription in Friedreich's ataxia. Nucleic Acids Research 39: 8366– 8377. 21745819 PMC3201871
  62. Kit S. 1961. Equilibrium sedimentation in density gradients of DNA preparations from animal tissues. Journal of Molecular Biology 3: 711– 716. 14456492
  63. Krol J, Fiszer A, Mykowska A, Sobczak K, de Mezer M, Krzyzosiak WJ. 2007. Ribonuclease dicer cleaves triplet repeat hairpins into shorter repeats that silence specific targets. Molecular Cell 25: 575– 586. 17317629
  64. Kumar AS, Sowpati DT, Mishra RK. 2016. Single amino acid repeats in the proteome world: structural, functional, and evolutionary insights. PLoS ONE 11: e0166854. 27893794 PMC5125637
  65. La Spada AR, Taylor JP. 2010. Repeat expansion disease: progress and puzzles in disease pathogenesis. Nature Reviews. Genetics 11: 247– 258. PMC4704680 20177426
  66. Leitao E, Schroder C, Depienne C. 2024. Identification and characterization of repeat expansions in neurological disorders: methodologies, tools, and strategies. Revue Neurologique (Paris) 180: 383– 392. 38594146
  67. Levdansky E, Romano J, Shadkchan Y, Sharon H, Verstrepen KJ, Fink GR, Osherov N. 2007. Coding tandem repeats generate diversity in Aspergillus fumigatus genes. Eukaryotic Cell 6: 1380– 1391. 17557878 PMC1951137
  68. Li Z, Wang B, Luo W, Xu Y, Wang J, Xue Z, Niu Y, Cheng Z, Ge S, Zhang W et al. 2023. Natural variation of codon repeats in COLD11 endows rice with chilling resilience. Science Advances 9: eabq5506. 36608134 PMC9821855
  69. Lindqvist C, Laakkonen L, Albert VA. 2007. Polyglutamine variation in a flowering time protein correlates with Island age in a Hawaiian plant radiation. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 105. 17605781 PMC1939987
  70. Logsdon GA, Vollger MR, Hsieh P, Mao Y, Liskovykh MA, Koren S, Nurk S, Mercuri L, Dishuck PC, Rhie A et al. 2021. The structure, function and evolution of a complete human chromosome 8. Nature 593: 101– 107. 33828295 PMC8099727
  71. Lu W, Zhang Y, Liu D, Songyang Z, Wan M. 2013. Telomeres‐structure, function, and regulation. Experimental Cell Research 319: 133– 141. 23006819 PMC4051234
  72. Lye ZN, Purugganan MD. 2019. Copy number variation in domestication. Trends in Plant Science 24: 352– 365. 30745056
  73. Macknight R, Bancroft I, Page T, Lister C, Schmidt R, Love K, Westphal L, Murphy G, Sherson S, Cobbett C et al. 1997. FCA, a gene controlling flowering time in Arabidopsis, encodes a protein containing RNA‐binding domains. Cell 89: 737– 745. 9182761
  74. Magadum S, Banerjee U, Murugan P, Gangapur D, Ravikesavan R. 2013. Gene duplication as a major force in evolution. Journal of Genetics 92: 155– 161. 23640422
  75. Maison C, Romeo K, Bailly D, Dubarry M, Quivy JP, Almouzni G. 2012. The SUMO protease SENP7 is a critical component to ensure HP1 enrichment at pericentric heterochromatin. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 19: 458– 460. 22388734
  76. McGurk MP, Barbash DA. 2018. Double insertion of transposable elements provides a substrate for the evolution of satellite DNA. Genome Research 28: 714– 725. 29588362 PMC5932611
  77. Melters DP, Bradnam KR, Young HA, Telis N, May MR, Ruby JG, Sebra R, Peluso P, Eid J, Rank D et al. 2013. Comparative analysis of tandem repeats from hundreds of species reveals unique insights into centromere evolution. Genome Biology 14: R10. 23363705 PMC4053949
  78. Mestrovic N, Mravinac B, Pavlek M, Vojvoda‐Zeljko T, Satovic E, Plohl M. 2015. Structural and functional liaisons between transposable elements and satellite DNAs. Chromosome Research 23: 583– 596. 26293606
  79. Michael TP, Park S, Kim TS, Booth J, Byer A, Sun Q, Chory J, Lee K. 2007. Simple sequence repeats provide a substrate for phenotypic variation in the Neurospora crassa circadian clock. PLoS ONE 2: e795. 17726525 PMC1949147
  80. Miga KH, Koren S, Rhie A, Vollger MR, Gershman A, Bzikadze A, Brooks S, Howe E, Porubsky D, Logsdon GA et al. 2020. Telomere‐to‐telomere assembly of a complete human X chromosome. Nature 585: 79– 84. 32663838 PMC7484160
  81. Morgante M, Olivieri AM. 1993. PCR‐amplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics. The Plant Journal 3: 175– 182. 8401603
  82. Morrell R, Sadanandom A. 2019. Dealing with stress: a review of plant SUMO proteases. Frontiers in Plant Science 10: 1122. 31620153 PMC6759571
  83. Mukamel RE, Handsaker RE, Sherman MA, Barton AR, Zheng Y, McCarroll SA, Loh PR. 2021. Protein‐coding repeat polymorphisms strongly shape diverse human phenotypes. Science 373: 1499– 1505. 34554798 PMC8549062
  84. Nageshwaran S, Festenstein R. 2015. Epigenetics and triplet‐repeat neurological diseases. Frontiers in Neurology 6: 262. 26733936 PMC4685448
  85. Naish M, Alonge M, Wlodzimierz P, Tock AJ, Abramson BW, Schmucker A, Mandakova T, Jamge B, Lambing C, Kuo P et al. 2021. The genetic and epigenetic landscape of the Arabidopsis centromeres. Science 374: eabi7489. 34762468 PMC10164409
  86. Niu XM, Xu YC, Li ZW, Bian YT, Hou XH, Chen JF, Zou YP, Jiang J, Wu Q, Ge S et al. 2019. Transposable elements drive rapid phenotypic variation in Capsella rubella. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 116: 6908– 6913. PMC6452725 30877258
  87. Nurk S, Koren S, Rhie A, Rautiainen M, Bzikadze AV, Mikheenko A, Vollger MR, Altemose N, Uralsky L, Gershman A et al. 2022. The complete sequence of a human genome. Science 376: 44– 53. 35357919 PMC9186530
  88. Ohno S. 1972. So much “junk” DNA in our genome. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology 23: 366– 370. 5065367
  89. Orgel LE, Crick FH. 1980. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature 284: 604– 607. 7366731
  90. Pontes O, Li CF, Costa Nunes P, Haag J, Ream T, Vitins A, Jacobsen SE, Pikaard CS. 2006. The Arabidopsis chromatin‐modifying nuclear siRNA pathway involves a nucleolar RNA processing center. Cell 126: 79– 92. 16839878
  91. Pos O, Radvanszky J, Buglyo G, Pos Z, Rusnakova D, Nagy B, Szemes T. 2021. DNA copy number variation: main characteristics, evolutionary significance, and pathological aspects. Biomedical Journal 44: 548– 559. 34649833 PMC8640565
  92. Press MO, McCoy RC, Hall AN, Akey JM, Queitsch C. 2018. Massive variation of short tandem repeats with functional consequences across strains of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Research 28: 1169– 1178. 29970452 PMC6071631
  93. Rai M, Soragni E, Chou CJ, Barnes G, Jones S, Rusche JR, Gottesfeld JM, Pandolfo M. 2010. Two new pimelic diphenylamide HDAC inhibitors induce sustained frataxin upregulation in cells from Friedreich's ataxia patients and in a mouse model. PLoS ONE 5: e8825. 20098685 PMC2809102
  94. Raschke A, Ibanez C, Ullrich KK, Anwer MU, Becker S, Glockner A, Trenner J, Denk K, Saal B, Sun X et al. 2015. Natural variants of ELF3 affect thermomorphogenesis by transcriptionally modulating PIF4‐dependent auxin response genes. BMC Plant Biology 15: 197. 26269119 PMC4535396
  95. Reinar WB, Greulich A, Sto IM, Knutsen JB, Reitan T, Torresen OK, Jentoft S, Butenko MA, Jakobsen KS. 2023. Adaptive protein evolution through length variation of short tandem repeats in Arabidopsis. Science Advances 9: eadd6960. 36947624 PMC10032594
  96. Reinar WB, Lalun VO, Reitan T, Jakobsen KS, Butenko MA. 2021. Length variation in short tandem repeats affects gene expression in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 33: 2221– 2234. 33848350 PMC8364236
  97. Rival P, Press MO, Bale J, Grancharova T, Undurraga SF, Queitsch C. 2014. The conserved PFT1 tandem repeat is crucial for proper flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 198: 747– 754. 25116137 PMC4196625
  98. Romeo K, Louault Y, Cantaloube S, Loiodice I, Almouzni G, Quivy JP. 2015. The SENP7 SUMO‐protease presents a module of two HP1 interaction motifs that locks HP1 protein at pericentric heterochromatin. Cell Reports 10: 771– 782. 25660026
  99. Sandi C, Al‐Mahdawi S, Pook MA. 2013. Epigenetics in Friedreich's ataxia: challenges and opportunities for therapy. Genetics Research International 20: 852080. PMC3590757 23533785
  100. Schaper E, Anisimova M. 2015. The evolution and function of protein tandem repeats in plants. New Phytologist 206: 397– 410. 25420631
  101. Sun T, Zhou F, Huang XQ, Chen WC, Kong MJ, Zhou CF, Zhuang Z, Li L, Lu S. 2019. ORANGE represses chloroplast biogenesis in etiolated Arabidopsis cotyledons via interaction with TCP14. Plant Cell 31: 2996– 3014. 31604812 PMC6925005
  102. Sureshkumar S, Bandaranayake C, Lv J, Dent CI, Bhagat PK, Mukherjee S, Sarwade R, Atri C, York HM, Tamizhselvan P et al. 2024. SUMO protease FUG1, histone reader AL3 and chromodomain protein LHP1 are integral to repeat expansion‐induced gene silencing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Plants 10: 749– 759. 38641663
  103. Sureshkumar S, Todesco M, Schneeberger K, Harilal R, Balasubramanian S, Weigel D. 2009. A genetic defect caused by a triplet repeat expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 323: 1060– 1063. 19150812
  104. Sutherland GR, Richards RI. 1995. Simple tandem DNA repeats and human genetic disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 3636– 3641. PMC42017 7731957
  105. Tabib A, Vishwanathan S, Seleznev A, McKeown PC, Downing T, Dent C, Sanchez‐Bermejo E, Colling L, Spillane C, Balasubramanian S. 2016. A polynucleotide repeat expansion causing temperature‐sensitivity persists in wild Irish accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 8745. PMC5006647 27630650
  106. Taheri S, Lee Abdullah T, Yusop MR, Hanafi MM, Sahebi M, Azizi P, Shamshiri RR. 2018. Mining and development of novel ssr markers using next generation sequencing (NGS) data in plants. Molecules 23: 5487. PMC6017569 29438290
  107. Talbert PB, Henikoff S. 2020. What makes a centromere? Experimental Cell Research 389: 111895. 32035948
  108. Tautz D. 1993. Notes on the definition and nomenclature of tandemly repetitive DNA sequences. EXS 67: 21– 28. 8400689
  109. Tautz D, Renz M. 1984. Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 12: 4127– 4138. 6328411 PMC318821
  110. Tautz D, Schlotterer M. 1994. Simple sequences. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 4: 832– 837. 7888752
  111. Tenchov R, Sasso JM, Zhou QA. 2024. Polyglutamine (PolyQ) diseases: navigating the landscape of neurodegeneration. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 15: 2665– 2694. 38996083 PMC11311141
  112. Tossolini I, Mencia R, Arce AL, Manavella PA. 2025. The genome awakens: transposon‐mediated gene regulation. Trends in Plant Science 25: 458. 40069082
  113. Toth G, Gaspari Z, Jurka J. 2000. Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: survey and analysis. Genome Research 10: 967– 981. 10899146 PMC310925
  114. Trujillo JT, Beilstein MA, Mosher RA. 2016. The Argonaute‐binding platform of NRPE1 evolves through modulation of intrinsically disordered repeats. New Phytologist 212: 1094– 1105. 27431917 PMC5125548
  115. Undurraga SF, Press MO, Legendre M, Bujdoso N, Bale J, Wang H, Davis SJ, Verstrepen KJ, Queitsch C. 2012. Background‐dependent effects of polyglutamine variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana gene ELF3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 19363– 19367. PMC3511081 23129635
  116. Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME. 2005. Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends in Biotechnology 23: 48– 55. 15629858
  117. Verkerk AJ, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe JS, Fu YH, Kuhl DP, Pizzuti A, Reiner O, Richards S, Victoria MF, Zhang FP et al. 1991. Identification of a gene (FMR‐1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell 65: 905– 914. 1710175
  118. Verstrepen KJ, Jansen A, Lewitter F, Fink GR. 2005. Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability. Nature Genetics 37: 986– 990. 16086015 PMC1462868
  119. Weber JL. 1990. Informativeness of human (dC‐dA)n.(dG‐dT)n polymorphisms. Genomics 7: 524– 530. 1974878
  120. Winter R, Liebold J, Schwarz E. 2013. The unresolved puzzle why alanine extensions cause disease. Biological Chemistry 394: 951– 963. 23612654
  121. Wlodzimierz P, Rabanal FA, Burns R, Naish M, Primetis E, Scott A, Mandakova T, Gorringe N, Tock AJ, Holland D et al. 2023. Cycles of satellite and transposon evolution in Arabidopsis centromeres. Nature 618: 557– 565. 37198485
  122. Wright SE, Todd PK. 2023. Native functions of short tandem repeats. eLife 12: 1584. PMC10027321 36940239
  123. Yandim C, Natisvili T, Festenstein R. 2013. Gene regulation and epigenetics in Friedreich's ataxia. Journal of Neurochemistry 126: 21– 42. 23859339
  124. Zagotta MT, Shannon S, Jacobs C, Meeks‐Wagner DR. 1992. Early‐flowering mutants of Arabidopsis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 19: 411– 418.
  125. Zattera ML, Bruschi DP. 2022. Transposable elements as a source of novel repetitive DNA in the eukaryote genome. Cells 11: 145. 36359770 PMC9659126
  126. Zhang Z‐Q, Jiang J, Xu Y‐C, Dent CI, Sureshkumar S, Balasubramanian S, Guo Y‐L. 2025. Mutations in short tandem repeats explain abundant train heritability in Arabidopsis. BioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.07.641981. PMC12341274 40796852 · DOI
  127. Zhu Z, Trenner J, Delker C, Quint M. 2024. Tracing the evolutionary history of the temperature‐sensing prion‐like domain in EARLY FLOWERING 3 highlights the uniqueness of AtELF3. Molecular Biology and Evolution 41: msae205. 39391982 PMC11523139

Cited by

Authors
Sureshkumar, S., Chhabra, A., Guo, Y., & Balasubramanian, S.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Balasubramanian, Sureshkumar
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-05-05
Volume
247
Issue
2
Pages
504-517
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W4410133537
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1182090)
  • Australian Research Council (DP1095325, FT100100377, FT190100403)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Keywords
microsatellite markers, tandem repeats, repeat expansion, repetitive DNA, plant development, environmental response, plant adaptation, polyalanine expansion, protein-protein interaction, allelic variation, plant disease, molecular markers, plant evolution
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Environment, Plants, Microsatellite Repeats, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review